Moderator: Community Team
Army of GOD wrote:Not a huge fan of qwert's. Pictures speak louder than letters.
Army of GOD wrote:Though, I surely like it over the current one.
AT LEAST MAKE THE "?" SILVER/GOLD!
Queen_Herpes wrote:Woodruff wrote:Queen_Herpes wrote:JoshyBoy wrote:AndyDufresne wrote:Question Mark still is number 1 for me by far, I don't think any contest would change it.
--Andy
I kinda have to agree with our main monkey there I'm afraid.
Darn, I should have become a Sugs Moderator so I could sticky my own suggestion.
Oh well. Perhaps since this suggestion is only 2 weeks old, we could give the ccommunity some time to review.
While we're stickying it, why don't we go ahead and try to make it a valid poll?
You are rightly concerned about validity, but I am rightly concerned about erasing the poll results again. I didn't "leave it out" on purpose. Once I saw that the previous results got wiped I wasn't going to reset it again. Give it time, and I will reset the whole poll again to add in "leave it as a boring '?' " as an option and I will also cull the options that haven't received votes.
Queen_Herpes wrote:Darwins_Bane wrote:to be fair, you should really add an option to keep the original question mark, even if it's just for posterity.
Yeah, I'm getting there...
Queen_Herpes wrote:Poll edited to reflect the new contest entry from Qwert! ...and removed three entries that had underperformed!
Queen_Herpes wrote:Read the poll "question" and perchance you will understand...
Thank you everyone who has voted to this point!!
Woodruff wrote:Queen_Herpes wrote:Poll edited to reflect the new contest entry from Qwert! ...and removed three entries that had underperformed!Queen_Herpes wrote:Read the poll "question" and perchance you will understand...
Thank you everyone who has voted to this point!!
Your dishonesty is palpable, Queen_Herpes...in fact, it's really quite disgusting. Yes, I am serious. I suggest that this thread be locked and moved to the rejected pile, due to the originator of the thread not taking it seriously herself.
Queen_Herpes wrote:Woodruff wrote:Queen_Herpes wrote:Poll edited to reflect the new contest entry from Qwert! ...and removed three entries that had underperformed!Queen_Herpes wrote:Read the poll "question" and perchance you will understand...
Thank you everyone who has voted to this point!!
Your dishonesty is palpable, Queen_Herpes...in fact, it's really quite disgusting. Yes, I am serious. I suggest that this thread be locked and moved to the rejected pile, due to the originator of the thread not taking it seriously herself.
Where do you get that from? The suggestion is to come up with a replacement for the "?" The suggestion is not: should we or should we not replace the "?" Upon a consensus for a replacement, I will then move to suggest replacing the "?" with the contest winner.
Woodruff wrote:Queen_Herpes wrote:Woodruff wrote:Queen_Herpes wrote:Poll edited to reflect the new contest entry from Qwert! ...and removed three entries that had underperformed!Queen_Herpes wrote:Read the poll "question" and perchance you will understand...
Thank you everyone who has voted to this point!!
Your dishonesty is palpable, Queen_Herpes...in fact, it's really quite disgusting. Yes, I am serious. I suggest that this thread be locked and moved to the rejected pile, due to the originator of the thread not taking it seriously herself.
Where do you get that from? The suggestion is to come up with a replacement for the "?" The suggestion is not: should we or should we not replace the "?" Upon a consensus for a replacement, I will then move to suggest replacing the "?" with the contest winner.
Despite your statement several times that you were going to add it to the poll...and didn't, you mean?
I would further suggest that your "removing three entries that had underperformed" is dishonest as well, because if someone actually preferred those over even the new additions, you're essentially saying that their opinions don't matter at all and they'd better just vote for one of the more popular ones. The problem with that view is that it may end up skewing which preference is actually the majority preference, as you wind up with people being forced to select their second choice rather than their first one.
Queen_Herpes wrote:Qwert, I'm sorry people aren't voting for your entry! We will see soon who has the most votes!
Woodruff wrote:Queen_Herpes wrote:Qwert, I'm sorry people aren't voting for your entry! We will see soon who has the most votes!
Lock this thing up and throw away the key, as the thread originator has no interest in being serious about it. Why are we wasting time with it?
Woodruff wrote:Queen_Herpes wrote:Qwert, I'm sorry people aren't voting for your entry! We will see soon who has the most votes!
Lock this thing up and throw away the key, as the thread originator has no interest in being serious about it. Why are we wasting time with it?
Queen_Herpes wrote:Woodruff wrote:Queen_Herpes wrote:Qwert, I'm sorry people aren't voting for your entry! We will see soon who has the most votes!
Lock this thing up and throw away the key, as the thread originator has no interest in being serious about it. Why are we wasting time with it?
Why do you keep saying that? I am absolutely serious about this.
Queen_Herpes wrote:Your posts are getting rude.
Queen_Herpes wrote:The point of this suggestion is to first, gather interest in one replacement to go head-to-head with the "?" There is no need to muddy the issue by taking all the support for a replacement and spreading it thin against the "?" in a poll at this point.
Woodruff wrote:Queen_Herpes wrote:Woodruff wrote:Queen_Herpes wrote:Qwert, I'm sorry people aren't voting for your entry! We will see soon who has the most votes!
Lock this thing up and throw away the key, as the thread originator has no interest in being serious about it. Why are we wasting time with it?
Why do you keep saying that? I am absolutely serious about this.
I keep saying it because you're clearly not serious about it. You refuse to have the poll contain any validity, and then you remove options arbitrarily which can't help but skew the poll itself into bad results.
Woodruff wrote:Queen_Herpes wrote:Your posts are getting rude.
I don't believe I am being rude at all, but that is a highly ironic statement on your part.
Woodruff wrote:Queen_Herpes wrote:The point of this suggestion is to first, gather interest in one replacement to go head-to-head with the "?" There is no need to muddy the issue by taking all the support for a replacement and spreading it thin against the "?" in a poll at this point.
There's no point in having the issue at all if the ? were to be decided here and now. Sadly, you're unwilling to "take that chance", I guess...you're allowing either your ego or your desire to have your own way get in the way of it.
Queen_Herpes wrote:Woodruff wrote:Queen_Herpes wrote:Woodruff wrote:Queen_Herpes wrote:Qwert, I'm sorry people aren't voting for your entry! We will see soon who has the most votes!
Lock this thing up and throw away the key, as the thread originator has no interest in being serious about it. Why are we wasting time with it?
Why do you keep saying that? I am absolutely serious about this.
I keep saying it because you're clearly not serious about it. You refuse to have the poll contain any validity, and then you remove options arbitrarily which can't help but skew the poll itself into bad results.
I am serious about the topic, which is why I originally PM'ed you about it, yet you continue to bring the conversation back to the thread. It is clear that your intentions are to get the topic shuttered, and your methodology is to have an enormous off-topic argument.
Queen_Herpes wrote:Woodruff wrote:Queen_Herpes wrote:Your posts are getting rude.
I don't believe I am being rude at all, but that is a highly ironic statement on your part.
Please explain the irony.
Queen_Herpes wrote:Woodruff wrote:Queen_Herpes wrote:The point of this suggestion is to first, gather interest in one replacement to go head-to-head with the "?" There is no need to muddy the issue by taking all the support for a replacement and spreading it thin against the "?" in a poll at this point.
There's no point in having the issue at all if the ? were to be decided here and now. Sadly, you're unwilling to "take that chance", I guess...you're allowing either your ego or your desire to have your own way get in the way of it.
Yes, there is a point in having the discussion. There are people out there with ideas and artistic ability. I'd like to hear from them. I have heard from some and I am supporting those ideas.
If you have further person attacks like this one: "you're allowing either your ego or your desire to have your own way," then please take it to PM. There is no place for it in this suggestion nor in this forum. You have received one PM about it, you can start by replying to that PM.
Doc_Brown wrote:Since QH doesn't want to answer the more important question, I've posted a new thread here with a poll to find out whether there is actually support to change the NR icon.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Return to Archived Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users