Forum

by **steelplayin** on Thu Feb 22, 2007 12:46 pm

would the mods consider implementing an option for a round limit on games such as a 100, 75, and even 50 round limit with the winner bieng declared by the who has the most armies on the board(if player still remain by this time)-this would make for exciting finishes and stop the stalemates especially in no card games-what does everyone else think?

by **steelplayin** on Thu Feb 22, 2007 12:47 pm

sorry-maybe this should haver been posted under the suggestion link

by **Nous-irons** on Thu Feb 22, 2007 1:04 pm

Absolutely not ... some people are fine with the equilibrium. It's an interesting study, anyway. The appropriate measure is for all the players to agree to cancel a game, not round limits.

by **steelplayin** on Thu Feb 22, 2007 1:28 pm

just as an option-keyword-option

by **AAFitz** on Thu Feb 22, 2007 1:56 pm

as options it would be cool...though each would be played completely differently....the only thing is is im pretty sure they dont want to add too many options to the games for fear of making it too confusing, from what ive seen, but it would be a cool option

by **max is gr8** on Thu Feb 22, 2007 1:58 pm

Please change the title so in brackets you say (move to suggestions)

Thankyou for your cooperation if you do so

by **steelplayin** on Thu Feb 22, 2007 2:07 pm

by **Heimdall** on Thu Feb 22, 2007 6:45 pm

I would prefer an "offer draw" option when the game is down to 3 players

by **yeti_c** on Thu Feb 22, 2007 7:02 pm

steelplayin wrote:just as an option-keyword-option

The problem with being an option is that at the beginning of the game you don't know how long the game will last - it could be a 7 turn wonder - or a 200 turn slog out... Or perhaps only a 25!

The option therefore would need to be turn-on-able during play - and then the players would have to choose the end point - and then no-one would agree... and it would all get too complicated!!

C.

by **steelplayin** on Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:55 pm

the option is would be given at "start your game" so that you can choose to start a game like 100, 75,50, or no limit-I understand not everyone would like a limit on there games or the game to be determined, so if you dont like it, you dont join it or start one.I bet many would play a limit game especially with no cards-the closer you get to the last round, the remaing players with there huge armies would have to make a move against the big man on the board as the winner would be the one with the most armies-I would like that-maybe that is just me????

by **steelplayin** on Fri Feb 23, 2007 1:05 pm

winner would be determined by usual way(last one left) or at the end of the last round -determined at the start of the game-by who has the most armies left

by **lackattack** on Fri Feb 23, 2007 1:46 pm

or maybe who has the most territories. this would be useful for tournament games, no?

by **alstergren** on Fri Feb 23, 2007 1:49 pm

Both ways are crap.

Why wouldn't you want finish a game properly?

To paraphrase one of the greatest films of all time - There can only be one…

No sense messing up the settings even more just because the boys in here lack the stamina to finish the fights when facing the men… :shock:

by **steelplayin** on Fri Feb 23, 2007 3:14 pm

:lol: :lol: :lol: okay....like I said before-it would be an option (please explain why you "think" you would be less of a man for joining a game that has a limit on rounds). This option is for those that dont want the stalemate and maybe some more action and good idea for tournys for those that want the tournys to include no card games(that involve more stradegy) that wont last a half a year or more like the royal rumble matches-besides, this is a game and options are good for everyone-