Moderator: Community Team

With the way the privileges and game finder are structured, there would have to be anywhere from 50-100 privileges to give out in order for each clan/usergroup to have privileges for within their group, as well as any that are needed for clan challenges. Under the current game finder, this would clog up the drop down menu that shows all the tournament games in the game finder. And that's assuming each group only gets permanent privileges once rather than for each time they run a tournament. There's also another issue with permanent privileges: it would allow freemiums in a clan/usergroup to make their own private games without having to pay for premium. Other logistics include that the current privileges have to link to a public thread, but that's not possible for in-clan tournaments.owenshooter wrote:Nightstrike, nice post!! however, what prohibits this from occurring? the mods are running one now and the entire Clan League is one big private tournament. i don't understand why this isn't possible logistically...-0
No maam. If it is in the regulations, then it obviously doesn't fall under a "privilege". It is then a regulatory direction.stahrgazer wrote:Big differences...
In the military, they make CLEAR in the rulebooks, what the privileges are; and those things that are forbidden to any troops remain forbidden to military leaders.
this is a great answer... better than the one lobbed out by an admin... however, it is still against the rules...-0Night Strike wrote:With the way the privileges and game finder are structured, there would have to be anywhere from 50-100 privileges to give out in order for each clan/usergroup to have privileges for within their group, as well as any that are needed for clan challenges. Under the current game finder, this would clog up the drop down menu that shows all the tournament games in the game finder. And that's assuming each group only gets permanent privileges once rather than for each time they run a tournament. There's also another issue with permanent privileges: it would allow freemiums in a clan/usergroup to make their own private games without having to pay for premium. Other logistics include that the current privileges have to link to a public thread, but that's not possible for in-clan tournaments.owenshooter wrote:Nightstrike, nice post!! however, what prohibits this from occurring? the mods are running one now and the entire Clan League is one big private tournament. i don't understand why this isn't possible logistically...-0
My solution would be to have a separate privilege granter and game finder drop down that is labeled for clan games that the Clan Directors control. But I have no clue if lack wants to do this or find some other system.

owenshooter wrote: this is a great answer... better than the one lobbed out by an admin... however, it is still against the rules...-0
your recent campaign to become a mod is wonderful. however, you keep repeating yourself and are speaking for team CC in a manner in which you truly are not qualified to do. if this is the stance they are going to take or have taken, they should say so. prime was in here and did not state this dictatorial slant that you are continually cap locking at me. you have no counter argument other than this argument which the admins and mods posting in here have not stated. simply put, in clear small words that are easily understood. you are not a member of team CC and thus should stop speaking as if you are a member of team CC. your repeated statement is not only counter to what has been stated and explained by an admin and a few mods (great answer nightstrike), but would also be detrimental to the site if so stated... CC depends on paying customers and volunteers to run this site. if they took the obtuse stand that you are continually declaring, they would lose memberships, and thus money. targetman, you are not answering the question or furthering the thread along, so why don't you go get involved in a thread that you have the capacity to actually contribute something constructive instead playing mod within this one...-0targetman377 wrote:that is not the point IT IS HIS SITE HE CAN DO WHAT HE WANTS WITH IT. if lack and the admins are ok with it guess what they can do whatever they want they run/own this site and NOT u the rules are not the CONSTITUITON!!! i think that is what you are forgeting. this is there site and they can do what they want with it. dont like it leave.owenshooter wrote: this is a great answer... better than the one lobbed out by an admin... however, it is still against the rules...-0

owenshooter wrote:your recent campaign to become a mod is wonderful. however, you keep repeating yourself and are speaking for team CC in a manner in which you truly are not qualified to do. if this is the stance they are going to take or have taken, they should say so. prime was in here and did not state this dictatorial slant that you are continually cap locking at me. you have no counter argument other than this argument which the admins and mods posting in here have not stated. simply put, in clear small words that are easily understood. you are not a member of team CC and thus should stop speaking as if you are a member of team CC. your repeated statement is not only counter to what has been stated and explained by an admin and a few mods (great answer nightstrike), but would also be detrimental to the site if so stated... CC depends on paying customers and volunteers to run this site. if they took the obtuse stand that you are continually declaring, they would lose memberships, and thus money. targetman, you are not answering the question or furthering the thread along, so why don't you go get involved in a thread that you have the capacity to actually contribute something constructive instead playing mod within this one...-0targetman377 wrote:that is not the point IT IS HIS SITE HE CAN DO WHAT HE WANTS WITH IT. if lack and the admins are ok with it guess what they can do whatever they want they run/own this site and NOT u the rules are not the CONSTITUITON!!! i think that is what you are forgeting. this is there site and they can do what they want with it. dont like it leave.owenshooter wrote: this is a great answer... better than the one lobbed out by an admin... however, it is still against the rules...-0

If I remember correctly I asked one of the TDs about having a private clan tournament and he said," No private tournaments. They must have 50% of the spots open to the public. NO EXCEPTIONS."The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:It's an exception to the rule because it's meant to be a team building exercise. Since we have so many new faces, what better way to get to know eachother and learn to work better as a team then to play games together as a team!
Been around for too long...said things that shouldn't have been said...but all that has changedMr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
welcome to the wonderful world of double standards within the rules...-0colton24 wrote:If I remember correctly I asked one of the TDs about having a private clan tournament and he said," No private tournaments. They must have 50% of the spots open to the public. NO EXCEPTIONS."The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:It's an exception to the rule because it's meant to be a team building exercise. Since we have so many new faces, what better way to get to know eachother and learn to work better as a team then to play games together as a team!

owenshooter wrote:welcome to the wonderful world of double standards within the rules...-0colton24 wrote:If I remember correctly I asked one of the TDs about having a private clan tournament and he said," No private tournaments. They must have 50% of the spots open to the public. NO EXCEPTIONS."The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:It's an exception to the rule because it's meant to be a team building exercise. Since we have so many new faces, what better way to get to know eachother and learn to work better as a team then to play games together as a team!
I'm telling you...RHIP.owenshooter wrote:welcome to the wonderful world of double standards within the rules...-0colton24 wrote:If I remember correctly I asked one of the TDs about having a private clan tournament and he said," No private tournaments. They must have 50% of the spots open to the public. NO EXCEPTIONS."The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:It's an exception to the rule because it's meant to be a team building exercise. Since we have so many new faces, what better way to get to know eachother and learn to work better as a team then to play games together as a team!
Of course not. Most everybody does play public games. In fact, I play more tournament games than games with my clan members. The building team skills is meant to improve intra-team communications, etc., not necessarily actually team gaming skills.Kotaro wrote:So is it completely impossible for TeamCC to play, I don't know, public games to build team skills? Or is that just, a completely far out and insane idea?
As has already been said in this thread, the Tournament Directors did not break any of the tournament rules. The admins chose to use the tournament privileges. Since they're the ones who are the final say on implementing any rules on the site, they also get to choose when exceptions to those rules are made.Kotaro wrote:So you're saying it was impossible to promote communication between teammates besides going around the Tournament rules? That there was no choice but to prove to everyone that TeamCC doesn't obey their own rules?
the fact that your having a league is not the issue, the issue is that your using the tourney privileges that the rest of us are consistently denied. we clans have often been told that it is ridiculous for us to say that tourney rights are neccessary for such things... why did yall have to use them? when its so damn easy to do without? because this is what we have been told by you guys!!Optimus Prime wrote:It is a team building exercise, that's about the whole of it folks. Sorry to disappoint. The big turtle himself wanted the team to quickly get some games in as teammates with each other to strengthen team unity and communication and so this is how I chose to proceed.
because clan league is an 'official tournament' i thought..jpcloet wrote:Wait a minute! I thought I was the first to break this rule with my private league. Aka, the clan league. I'm the innovator.
azezzo wrote:
would be helpful as a team building exercise for clans as well
