Any and all points of view ... go ahead ...
But please in a General Discussion appropriate way

Alternatively, or in addition, please see this thread's twin in the Flame Wars forum ...
Moderator: Community Team
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
edbeard wrote:it would definitely increase at first (since certain peoples' playground would be gone), but in the long run it'd decrease. send a message that flaming is not acceptable behaviour. make examples of people who aren't playing well with others. as long as offenses are punished, it'll change the makeup of the forum.
right now people will flame and be told, "take it to flame wars guys". that says it's ok to flame until someone tells you not to. Or that if you flame elsewhere, it'll just get moved to flame wars later so no big deal.
get rid of it. get rid of that immature behaviour.
Anarkistsdream wrote:Sorry, but if you don't let it stay, it would never work. Almost EVERY forum has one (Please realize I said 'almost')
Many people here like to go there. If you don't want it, don't read it. No one forces you to Flame Wars.
Ray Rider wrote:edbeard wrote:it would definitely increase at first (since certain peoples' playground would be gone), but in the long run it'd decrease. send a message that flaming is not acceptable behaviour. make examples of people who aren't playing well with others. as long as offenses are punished, it'll change the makeup of the forum.
right now people will flame and be told, "take it to flame wars guys". that says it's ok to flame until someone tells you not to. Or that if you flame elsewhere, it'll just get moved to flame wars later so no big deal.
get rid of it. get rid of that immature behaviour.
I agree.
I've only gone into the flame wars a couple times, and every time I do, I'm amazed the low level of intelligence displayed there. I think it would greatly improve this website in the long run if it was deleted.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Ditocoaf wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:Sorry, but if you don't let it stay, it would never work. Almost EVERY forum has one (Please realize I said 'almost')
Many people here like to go there. If you don't want it, don't read it. No one forces you to Flame Wars.
That's funny, this is the first forum I've seen with one...
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:At least the people that are openly trolling have a place to do it in relative safety. Get rid of it, and they are forced to join you 'higher beings'...
Timminz wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:At least the people that are openly trolling have a place to do it in relative safety. Get rid of it, and they are forced to join you 'higher beings'...
Or maybe go vent their anonymous internet rage somewhere else.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:Timminz wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:At least the people that are openly trolling have a place to do it in relative safety. Get rid of it, and they are forced to join you 'higher beings'...
Or maybe go vent their anonymous internet rage somewhere else.
That won't happen.
I'm glad you guys live in this Utopia, but it isn't real.
edbeard wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:Timminz wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:At least the people that are openly trolling have a place to do it in relative safety. Get rid of it, and they are forced to join you 'higher beings'...
Or maybe go vent their anonymous internet rage somewhere else.
That won't happen.
I'm glad you guys live in this Utopia, but it isn't real.
if it doesn't happen then they'll get banned and we won't have the problem. either way (them stopping or not stopping), this behaviour won't be around CC anymore.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
hwhrhett wrote:i love the way that all the people defending flame wars are saying that by having flame wars it keeps flames out of the other forums.
i dont think these people have been paying attention.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
edbeard wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:Timminz wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:At least the people that are openly trolling have a place to do it in relative safety. Get rid of it, and they are forced to join you 'higher beings'...
Or maybe go vent their anonymous internet rage somewhere else.
That won't happen.
I'm glad you guys live in this Utopia, but it isn't real.
if it doesn't happen then they'll get banned and we won't have the problem. either way (them stopping or not stopping), this behaviour won't be around CC anymore.
timmytuttut88 wrote:It would be hilarious to see all the FW people who usually hate each other, working together to get it back.
oh ya, and my opinion:
Let FW stay, some of the stuff there is pretty funny...
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
jiminski wrote:timmytuttut88 wrote:It would be hilarious to see all the FW people who usually hate each other, working together to get it back.
oh ya, and my opinion:
Let FW stay, some of the stuff there is pretty funny...
yeah brilliant plan - make allies of all the lippy, loud-mouthed, belligerent, abusive miscreants on the site.. well the site has been short on drama recently!
Anarkistsdream wrote:hwhrhett wrote:i love the way that all the people defending flame wars are saying that by having flame wars it keeps flames out of the other forums.
i dont think these people have been paying attention.
And apparently you haven't read the thread properly.
Anarkistsdream wrote:How about we try this... Let's use FACTS to state our points as opposed to feelings or conjectures...
I'll start.![]()
Flame Wars would be gone, so flaming would be gone? That's your ingenious peoples' opisions, right?
Do the multi hunters stop there from being multis? No
Do the Suggestions/Bug Reports forum stop there from being problems? No
Does appointing admins to control the site stop there from being friction? No (Just look at the Twill/Wicked Debacle.)
Why you people think that just because there is no symptom means the disease would go away is ridiculous.
Not to mention, most of you don't go in FW anyway, so why do you care? Honestly, what makes you give a shit about it? For the people that use it, it helps relieve stress that they WILL otherwise take out on the community at large.
And, if it doesn't have direct affect on your life, why post in this thread at all? Where is your own rage and indignation coming from?
timmytuttut88 wrote:jiminski wrote:timmytuttut88 wrote:It would be hilarious to see all the FW people who usually hate each other, working together to get it back.
oh ya, and my opinion:
Let FW stay, some of the stuff there is pretty funny...
yeah brilliant plan - make allies of all the lippy, loud-mouthed, belligerent, abusive miscreants on the site.. well the site has been short on drama recently!
CC just seems to be making too many changes too fast, i'm not even used to the new forum yet...
trapyoung wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:How about we try this... Let's use FACTS to state our points as opposed to feelings or conjectures...
I'll start.![]()
Flame Wars would be gone, so flaming would be gone? That's your ingenious peoples' opisions, right?
Do the multi hunters stop there from being multis? No
Do the Suggestions/Bug Reports forum stop there from being problems? No
Does appointing admins to control the site stop there from being friction? No (Just look at the Twill/Wicked Debacle.)
Why you people think that just because there is no symptom means the disease would go away is ridiculous.
Not to mention, most of you don't go in FW anyway, so why do you care? Honestly, what makes you give a shit about it? For the people that use it, it helps relieve stress that they WILL otherwise take out on the community at large.
And, if it doesn't have direct affect on your life, why post in this thread at all? Where is your own rage and indignation coming from?
completely agree, and while it there is a certain amount of dick-tude that's caused by FW, most if it is kept there and most of it is completely harmless. i've flamed prowler, deliaselene, owenshooter, and many others but have also played games with them on the site and while much of what we say seems vehement, it's more like r-rated humor which the mods seem to hate outside of flame wars.
also, while people are constantly badgered in the normal threads to keep posts on topic to the OP's desires, flame wars is actually much more fun to participate in a conversation in because of the low amount of regulation. an actual conversation is allowed to occur and i feel that a large group would be alienated should it be removed.
are things that bad that map foundry is soooo negatively effected by flame wars' presence. i think not.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users