stahrgazer wrote:King_Herpes wrote:I think you two may have some sort of fucking problem.
LOL

KH, how's my fav disease?
To answer prime from a few responds ago,
1) I'm not a man.
2) Ask Twill, Hyrasri, James Vazquez, or a couple other mods that I femmed up and explained my concerns to for months before I got so fed up that I gave up.
3) If the site really doesn't care who pays and who rides for free, well, goodie for you. (I bet that
uncaring would change if everyone DID boycott paying, though!)
That of course is true. But everyone is not going to boycott. Further, there is nothing the site could do to possibly keep some from not boycotting. You simply cannot keep all the people happy all the time.
Further, since your concern was mostly about flame wars, and how you felt it was unfair, and clearly the main draw of the site, beyond the unlimited games, and multiple other forums with lots of great people:
Isnt it just possible, that the site owners, just didnt want to be associated with a site that had the kinds of things that flame wars has on it? Did you ever think that as individuals, they simply said, " I dont care if this costs me a bit of money. I simply dont want to have that forum on my game anymore."
"Do you realize that it probably was not a financial decision, but a personal one, and one that was made knowing full well, that It may or may not have been the best financial one?"
This is a site without one advertisement on it. It has tens of thousands of users, and it doesnt have one advertisement on it. Not one pop up by anyone. Do you think this was a financial decision? Or does it suggest the kind of person the owner of the site is, and why he makes the decisions he makes?
My point is, this site is being run by a guy, who has the talent and intellect to program this game. Do you really think a few people leaving was unexpected?
Further, do you not realize how many people are so much happier without flame wars, and without the constant flaming all over the site. Do you not realize how many parents are thankful, and more willing to let their kids play in here, on what is an incredibly intense game, filled with options of speed, strategy, and pure psychological warfare?
Do you not realize how many people out there are buying other people premiums, because they enjoy this site so much? How many people would gladly kick in a little more if asked? Or how much more lack could actually charge, especially compared to what he offers above other sites....forum included?
I hardly frequent a lot of games, but Ive seen enough though. This is still one of the most open forums around in a game like this. Certainly, it is the most comprehensive and best global strategy game around. So, really, do you think that everyone is going to just boycott this place? Or that youre $255 impact will ever have any impact? Or more importantly, that the things you dont like, are the exact things that others like, and inspire them to spend even more?
Just some examples for the flip side of your suggested boycott, and perhaps, just a bit of insight as to the possible motivations that an owner of a game like this, might have for making decisions, that his name and reputation are at stake on.
Its easy for all of us to suggest what should be, and what should be allowed, but there is no cost for us to make these suggestions. However, for the owner, he puts his life and entire reputation on the line. If you think $225 is going to get him to get him to sell out what he feels is morally correct, I think you are mistaken. I dont think $2250; $22,500; $225,000 would...
Maybe at $2,250,000 morals might be compromised, but thats not my place to say. If you have that cash, you may very well be able to get him to reinstate flame wars, and get some perma bannned players back. Myself, ill lobby for it, for say the $225,000 number.