"I have a lovely bunch of coconuts. . .deedleleedee

[Gen.LeeGettinhed]

. . .there they all all standing in a row . . "

About our CC Sigs:

Now I've seen everything. A CC female friend shoots me a pic of her raising her top to show off her nice rack. I add it to my Sig. . .then:
-I get a PM from one player stating something to the effect of: "I and several others are offended at that pic -- please take it down"
-I get a wall scrawl from another players stating: "NICE rack on your sig!"

That first one reminds me of a story by George Carlin. He says some radio station was playing something off-color. Some puritan down south objected and wanted the station shut down. George's response was "there are two nobs on the radio. one for changing the volume and . . . duh, one for switching the channel or turning it off. Although the puritan probably has a problem with things with two nobs".

My point is, there are multiple points of view on things and various ways of dealing with things. Just because you don't like something doesn't mean EVERYONE else (or even the majority of people) doesn't like/appreciate it. If you HAVE to voice your opinion, we understand, but for goodness sake PLEASE don't think your opinion is the concensus around here. I think the same general thing applies to flaming/baiting/trolling. At least be humorous about it.

What do YOU think (without baiting/flaming/trolling)?

* * *
I ask that: 1) repliers have the good manners to keep on-topic, 2) mods reprimand flamers/baiters/trollers to this thread -- and start being consistent. Funny jokes are one thing, getting nasty is quite another (no different than 3 penises are different than 2 breasts -- in so many ways).

[owenshooter]

off topic / in before the move or name change *cough*...-el Jesus negro

[jefjef]

And another GLG bait thread.. So very similar to the one this should be merged with and then locked and OP finally warned. http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=163459&start=0&p=3571513&view=show#p3571513

[Evolution299]

Hmmm. Looks like GLG admitted that he had a pic without the nipples covered in his sig. Where as in his C & A report he stated they were covered.
Is it possible to get a case in C&A re opened or do you have to re file? Either way, Im going to take a screen shot of this admittance of guilt.

[L M S]

Why am I the first one to ask to see the original sig for verification?

[Dukasaur]

I must admit, it is a pretty catchy title for a thread...)

[s3xt0y]

Why am I the first one to ask to see the original sig for verification?

trust me not necessary...google saggy

[ad10r3tr0]

Why am I the first one to ask to see the original sig for verification?

trust me not necessary...google saggy

LOL! it was indeed quite disturbing

[BigBallinStalin]

I ask that: 1) repliers have the good manners to keep on-topic, 2) mods reprimand flamers/baiters/trollers to this thread -- and start being consistent. Funny jokes are one thing, getting nasty is quite another (no different than 3 penises are different than 2 breasts -- in so many ways).

I agree that having 3 penises is better than having one--assuming that 2 of them could be removed, are easy to clean, and can organically reattach themselves with minimal costs to my person.

[Dukasaur]

I ask that: 1) repliers have the good manners to keep on-topic, 2) mods reprimand flamers/baiters/trollers to this thread -- and start being consistent. Funny jokes are one thing, getting nasty is quite another (no different than 3 penises are different than 2 breasts -- in so many ways).

I agree that having 3 penises is better than having one--assuming that 2 of them could be removed, are easy to clean, and can organically reattach themselves with minimal costs to my person.

Penis is Latin, isn't it? So it should be 3 penii.

[demonfork]

It's a completely sexist double standard that pics of men without their shirts are allowed to be posted but not those of women.