Conquer Club

The Passion of Owenshooter

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.

Was owenshooter's ban unfair?

 
Total votes : 0

Re: owenshooter got off easy

Postby Vace Cooper on Fri Aug 19, 2011 8:48 pm

Pirlo wrote:
Serbia wrote:
Pirlo wrote:I thought personal info should be applicable to CC members!


If you are suggesting that posting someone else's facebook page, who is not a member of CC, is not posting personal information about someone, I'm glad you brought that up!

On that page were pictures of InsomniaRed, posts made about Insom and, in fact, posts made BY Insom. In fact, look at owen's quote - the link was added in support of a post about Insom, along with directions on how to discover specific information about her on the linked-to page. Clearly, the link was a Personal Information violation.

Just because it was not InsomniaRed's personal page, doesn't mean it didn't contain personal information about her.


but Insom herself did post her real name which enable you to make search and find her profile?

she posted her own info all over CC, including her IMDB link!!! this was not personal info!! and the boyfriend is not a member of CC!!! you are stretching. one has nothing to do with the other. he did not receive a warning for this, so it does not appy to this thread. you are now trolling by having posted about this over a half dozen times. you are now trolling this thread by CC's new standard!!!
Image
owen is a sexy mother f***er
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Vace Cooper
 
Posts: 537
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:12 pm
Location: MN

Re: owenshooter got off easy

Postby Serbia on Fri Aug 19, 2011 8:56 pm

Vace Cooper wrote:
Pirlo wrote:
Serbia wrote:
Pirlo wrote:I thought personal info should be applicable to CC members!


If you are suggesting that posting someone else's facebook page, who is not a member of CC, is not posting personal information about someone, I'm glad you brought that up!

On that page were pictures of InsomniaRed, posts made about Insom and, in fact, posts made BY Insom. In fact, look at owen's quote - the link was added in support of a post about Insom, along with directions on how to discover specific information about her on the linked-to page. Clearly, the link was a Personal Information violation.

Just because it was not InsomniaRed's personal page, doesn't mean it didn't contain personal information about her.


but Insom herself did post her real name which enable you to make search and find her profile?

she posted her own info all over CC, including her IMDB link!!! this was not personal info!! and the boyfriend is not a member of CC!!! you are stretching. one has nothing to do with the other. he did not receive a warning for this, so it does not appy to this thread. you are now trolling by having posted about this over a half dozen times. you are now trolling this thread by CC's new standard!!!


Firstly, her profile is private, so I don't know how her boyfriend's information was found.
And Vace, if I post personal information about myself by posting a picture of myself, along with my name and my address, are you saying that it's acceptable for you then to search my name, find and post pictures of me being a drunken idiot at a bar with my arm around a woman other than my wife? That, sir, would be a stretch.

And I've detailed for you already why posting someone else's information can STILL count as personal information about the CC user. Again, from the Community Guidelines:
Using a person's real information, picture, address, blog or anything else "personal" is NOT ok, and is Personal Information Abuse.

That page was/is full of personal information on InsomniaRed. And don't forget, just because someone posted some information about themselves on this site, it DOES NOT give anyone else the right to post further personal information on them. This is, very clearly, an open-and-shut case.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Captain Serbia
 
Posts: 12267
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: owenshooter got off easy

Postby Pirlo on Fri Aug 19, 2011 9:09 pm

Serbia wrote:Firstly, her profile is private, so I don't know how her boyfriend's information was found.
And Vace, if I post personal information about myself by posting a picture of myself, along with my name and my address, are you saying that it's acceptable for you then to search my name, find and post pictures of me being a drunken idiot at a bar with my arm around a woman other than my wife? That, sir, would be a stretch.


as long as you make these pictures that show yourself as an idiot drunk available online, then it is definitely acceptable.
User avatar
Captain Pirlo
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 3:48 pm
362

Re: owenshooter got off easy

Postby Vace Cooper on Fri Aug 19, 2011 9:15 pm

Serbia wrote:
Vace Cooper wrote:
Pirlo wrote:
Serbia wrote:
Pirlo wrote:I thought personal info should be applicable to CC members!


If you are suggesting that posting someone else's facebook page, who is not a member of CC, is not posting personal information about someone, I'm glad you brought that up!

On that page were pictures of InsomniaRed, posts made about Insom and, in fact, posts made BY Insom. In fact, look at owen's quote - the link was added in support of a post about Insom, along with directions on how to discover specific information about her on the linked-to page. Clearly, the link was a Personal Information violation.

Just because it was not InsomniaRed's personal page, doesn't mean it didn't contain personal information about her.


but Insom herself did post her real name which enable you to make search and find her profile?

she posted her own info all over CC, including her IMDB link!!! this was not personal info!! and the boyfriend is not a member of CC!!! you are stretching. one has nothing to do with the other. he did not receive a warning for this, so it does not appy to this thread. you are now trolling by having posted about this over a half dozen times. you are now trolling this thread by CC's new standard!!!


Firstly, her profile is private, so I don't know how her boyfriend's information was found.
And Vace, if I post personal information about myself by posting a picture of myself, along with my name and my address, are you saying that it's acceptable for you then to search my name, find and post pictures of me being a drunken idiot at a bar with my arm around a woman other than my wife? That, sir, would be a stretch.

And I've detailed for you already why posting someone else's information can STILL count as personal information about the CC user. Again, from the Community Guidelines:
Using a person's real information, picture, address, blog or anything else "personal" is NOT ok, and is Personal Information Abuse.

That page was/is full of personal information on InsomniaRed. And don't forget, just because someone posted some information about themselves on this site, it DOES NOT give anyone else the right to post further personal information on them. This is, very clearly, an open-and-shut case.

then take it to C&A and stop trolling this thread with an unrelated "case". you are trolling by CC's own guidelines by posting off topic in this thread, repeatedly, beating a dead horse by stating the same thing. you are off topic and trolling for MULTIPLE PAGES NOW! owen made 6 posts in 16 hours!! 3 were responses to other users!! if you think this is an open and shut case, start a C&A about it and lengthen his ban. he was not warned about this, and was not given any punishment for this. so, go ahead and knock yourself out with a C&A thread, but stop derailing and trolling this thread with an unrelated case. GOOD DAY SIR!
Image
owen is a sexy mother f***er
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Vace Cooper
 
Posts: 537
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:12 pm
Location: MN

Re: owenshooter got off easy

Postby Serbia on Fri Aug 19, 2011 9:18 pm

Pirlo wrote:
Serbia wrote:Firstly, her profile is private, so I don't know how her boyfriend's information was found.
And Vace, if I post personal information about myself by posting a picture of myself, along with my name and my address, are you saying that it's acceptable for you then to search my name, find and post pictures of me being a drunken idiot at a bar with my arm around a woman other than my wife? That, sir, would be a stretch.


as long as you make these pictures that show yourself as an idiot drunk available online, then it is definitely acceptable.


You're wrong. It's still personal information. Blogs are on the internet, and they are off-limits, according to CC's rules. Why would pictures (facebook pages, twitter feeds, flickr accounts, etc.) be any different?
We are not debating opinion here, we're debating the enforcement of rules that are already on the books here at CC.



Vace, you're repeating yourself, and trolling. You are posting in a manner similar to owen, for which he was banned.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Captain Serbia
 
Posts: 12267
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: owenshooter

Postby Serbia on Fri Aug 19, 2011 9:19 pm

As far as starting a C&A thread, I'm waiting for a response from Team CC before I do that. That is the next step I will take, obviously.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Captain Serbia
 
Posts: 12267
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: owenshooter

Postby blakebowling on Fri Aug 19, 2011 9:26 pm

I didn't bother to read all 10 pages of this thread (mostly because I don't care that much), but I found it ironic that while he was banned for trolling, his premium giveaway contest remains stickied.
Private blakebowling
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:09 pm
Location: 127.0.0.1

Re: owenshooter got off easy

Postby Pirlo on Fri Aug 19, 2011 9:45 pm

Serbia wrote:
Pirlo wrote:
Serbia wrote:Firstly, her profile is private, so I don't know how her boyfriend's information was found.
And Vace, if I post personal information about myself by posting a picture of myself, along with my name and my address, are you saying that it's acceptable for you then to search my name, find and post pictures of me being a drunken idiot at a bar with my arm around a woman other than my wife? That, sir, would be a stretch.


as long as you make these pictures that show yourself as an idiot drunk available online, then it is definitely acceptable.


You're wrong. It's still personal information. Blogs are on the internet, and they are off-limits, according to CC's rules. Why would pictures (facebook pages, twitter feeds, flickr accounts, etc.) be any different?
We are not debating opinion here, we're debating the enforcement of rules that are already on the books here at CC.


dude, read your post... if you shared your real name here beside a pic of yourself, then you are enabling us to view your facebook profile page and pics... I have no Idea how it's illegal for me to bring any other pic of yourself from that facebook profile you shared here. :lol:
User avatar
Captain Pirlo
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 3:48 pm
362

Re: owenshooter got off easy

Postby Serbia on Fri Aug 19, 2011 9:51 pm

Pirlo wrote:
Serbia wrote:
Pirlo wrote:
Serbia wrote:Firstly, her profile is private, so I don't know how her boyfriend's information was found.
And Vace, if I post personal information about myself by posting a picture of myself, along with my name and my address, are you saying that it's acceptable for you then to search my name, find and post pictures of me being a drunken idiot at a bar with my arm around a woman other than my wife? That, sir, would be a stretch.


as long as you make these pictures that show yourself as an idiot drunk available online, then it is definitely acceptable.


You're wrong. It's still personal information. Blogs are on the internet, and they are off-limits, according to CC's rules. Why would pictures (facebook pages, twitter feeds, flickr accounts, etc.) be any different?
We are not debating opinion here, we're debating the enforcement of rules that are already on the books here at CC.


dude, read your post... if you shared your real name here beside a pic of yourself, then you are enabling us to view your facebook profile page and pics... I have no Idea how it's illegal for me to bring any other pic of yourself from that facebook profile you shared here. :lol:


I'm not saying that if I posted my facebook page, you can't post anything else from my facebook page. (although I believe that CC would still deem you guilty of posting personal information)
Look, you say Insom posted her facebook page. Fine. She DID NOT post her new boyfriend's page. Someone else posted that. On THAT page, which was never before posted by ANYONE on this site, let alone InsomniaRed, there was information about InsomniaRed concerning her personal life, suggesting she has a boyfriend, among other details. Did you know that beforehand? No, of course not. Why? Because she never posted it! Take the blinders off for one minute, and realize that I'm right here.

The information that was in that link contained personal information about InsomniaRed, including never-before-seen photos, that had NEVER BEEN SHARED BY INSOMNIARED. That is the absolute definition of posting personal information about someone. When you add in the fact that owen posted it with every intention of further destroying her reputation, it is most definitely ban worthy. This should not even be a debatable subject.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Captain Serbia
 
Posts: 12267
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: owenshooter got off easy

Postby Dibbun on Fri Aug 19, 2011 10:03 pm

Serbia wrote:The information that was in that link contained personal information about InsomniaRed, including never-before-seen photos, that had NEVER BEEN SHARED BY INSOMNIARED. That is the absolute definition of posting personal information about someone. When you add in the fact that owen posted it with every intention of further destroying her reputation, it is most definitely ban worthy. This should not even be a debatable subject.


She banned people from live chat for disputing her lies about being ill. Team CC let that happen. Therefore, they made her personal life canon, and when that canon was found to be quite, quite inaccurate, people naturally wanted the truth to be known.

It's not like he posted her porn pics. :-$
nagerous wrote:Dibbun is a well known psychotic from the forums

Army of GOD wrote:Congrats to Dibbun, the white jesus, and all of his mercy and forgiveness.

Jdsizzleslice wrote: So you can crawl back to whatever psychosocial nutjob hole you came from.
User avatar
Lieutenant Dibbun
 
Posts: 905
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 11:42 pm
Location: Fresno, CA

Re: owenshooter got off easy

Postby Vace Cooper on Fri Aug 19, 2011 10:14 pm

Serbia wrote:I'm not saying that if I posted my facebook page, you can't post anything else from my facebook page. (although I believe that CC would still deem you guilty of posting personal information)
Look, you say Insom posted her facebook page. Fine. She DID NOT post her new boyfriend's page. Someone else posted that. On THAT page, which was never before posted by ANYONE on this site, let alone InsomniaRed, there was information about InsomniaRed concerning her personal life, suggesting she has a boyfriend, among other details. Did you know that beforehand? No, of course not. Why? Because she never posted it! Take the blinders off for one minute, and realize that I'm right here.

The information that was in that link contained personal information about InsomniaRed, including never-before-seen photos, that had NEVER BEEN SHARED BY INSOMNIARED. That is the absolute definition of posting personal information about someone. When you add in the fact that owen posted it with every intention of further destroying her reputation, it is most definitely ban worthy. This should not even be a debatable subject.

you are repeating yourself, over and over and over. it is off topic from this thread. you are effectively trolling. please leave the thread and start your own C&A thread. you have surpassed what owen did to get 3 months and you don't even realize it. look forward to your C&A thread.
Image
owen is a sexy mother f***er
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Vace Cooper
 
Posts: 537
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:12 pm
Location: MN

Re: owenshooter

Postby Army of GOD on Sat Aug 20, 2011 12:06 am

JoshyBoy wrote:Fellas, we're missing the bigger picture here. That is, the current team of moderators is probably the worst team that has ever been assembled in the history of Conquer Club (not counting AKA). The focus is clearly on quantity, not quality. Shame on the mods who are actually decent.


Owen himself called your class of mods the "jr. mint mod squad", so I lol'd hard at this post.
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7191
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: owenshooter

Postby Uncle Death on Sat Aug 20, 2011 12:36 am

I'm a Bandit but probably Owen's least favorite. I'm not a big fan of the forums because so many posts I read make me queasy. The Bandits forum I have found to be remarkable due to the humor and intelligence exhibited there. Certainly not my posts but the other members posts I refer to. That for the most part is all I spend my time on looking at the forums with the one exception being a suggestion I made that made everybody go nuts. I mention that because I wouldn't post in the manner that Owen does but I respect his right to do so. I can see how some people find some of Owen's posts annoying but I look out there and I find so many more posters vastly more annoying it's not even funny. Owen was bragging or "representing" as you young people like to say about his contest. He was mildly making fun of others efforts to do the same. I understand how many of you will assume I am biased in my opinion but the truth is I'm really just barely biased. Owen getting this ban was not an impartial judgement. This was personal. People who didn't like him and had the power to do so used it. They used their little rule book which apparently changes quite often and sent him to the Gulag. They did not use reason. Before I punch somebody in the face or put a screwdriver in their knee I let them know they are starting to piss me off and ask them to quit it. I think that's reasonable. I just don't do it and then write a long explanation of why I did it. That is what happened regardless of past so called "offenses". If people were getting pissed why not just pm or call him out in the forums first? That wasn't done because somebody could use their power and get off on it.
Image
User avatar
Major Uncle Death
 
Posts: 255
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:13 pm

Re: owenshooter

Postby natty dread on Sat Aug 20, 2011 12:59 am

Serbia, quit trolling.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class natty dread
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: just plain fucked

Re: owenshooter

Postby Army of GOD on Sat Aug 20, 2011 1:05 am

natty_dread wrote:Serbia, quit trolling.


He's not trolling. What he's posting is legitimate and completely on-topic. BpB and Dibbun's ball sucking crew are looking for things that incriminate owen. Serbia is giving that.
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7191
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: owenshooter

Postby Fruitcake on Sat Aug 20, 2011 2:42 am

Just to clarify. Team cc are saying that to go into a thread, say giving away premium, and state an opinion, just the once, is fine?
Image

Due to current economic conditions the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off
User avatar
Colonel Fruitcake
 
Posts: 2194
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 6:38 am

Re: owenshooter

Postby TheSaxlad on Sat Aug 20, 2011 3:18 am

Yes. Stating it once gets the point across, hell even state it once in the thread and create your own thread to discuss it with community members.

But not the same opinion posted in various different ways all across site in a small period of time.
Image Caution: playing team games with TheSaxlad can lead to shortness of breath, high blood pressure and other-stress related illnesses!

Visit CC on Facebook and Twitter!
User avatar
Corporal TheSaxlad
 
Posts: 1138
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 5:42 am
Location: ShakeyCat's Saxland :)

Re: owenshooter

Postby Dukasaur on Sat Aug 20, 2011 3:56 am

jbrettlip wrote:I was just trying to explain why it was a 3 month ban. I disagree with the ban, and the fact that the escalating system has no "roll-off" period for infractions.

Before this gets buried, I would like to say that although I may disagree with you about everything else, I do agree on this one point. Any system based on cumulative demerit points should have an expiry date on the points.
ā€œā€ŽLife is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.ā€
― Voltaire
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
 
Posts: 28133
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara
32

Re: owenshooter

Postby Dukasaur on Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:10 am

Dibbun wrote:So if you are giving away premium, you are a protected class?

I recently discovered that I like to run tournaments. If someone posts in my thread saying my tournament sucks, best believe I'm going to reply saying why my tournament is awesome. If they persist, I will persist, and escalate the level of rhetoric if necessary.

If you don't mind having your tournament threads trolled, that's fine. Most people would mind. And most people, if they didn't like your tournament, would have the common courtesy to say so once and then move on, not hang around flogging a dead horse.
ā€œā€ŽLife is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.ā€
― Voltaire
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
 
Posts: 28133
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara
32

Re: owenshooter

Postby JoshyBoy on Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:41 am

So how long before the moderators lock this thread? This case just highlights how messed up the moderating on this site is, and exposes a flaw in the escalating system.
drunkmonkey wrote:I honestly wonder why anyone becomes a mod on this site. You're the whiniest bunch of players imaginable.

Ron Burgundy wrote:Why don't you go back to your home on Whore Island?
User avatar
Lieutenant JoshyBoy
 
Posts: 3750
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 6:04 pm
Location: In the gym. Yeah, still there.

Re: owenshooter got off easy

Postby BigBallinStalin on Sat Aug 20, 2011 5:03 am

Serbia wrote:
Vace Cooper wrote:
Pirlo wrote:
Serbia wrote:
Pirlo wrote:I thought personal info should be applicable to CC members!


If you are suggesting that posting someone else's facebook page, who is not a member of CC, is not posting personal information about someone, I'm glad you brought that up!

On that page were pictures of InsomniaRed, posts made about Insom and, in fact, posts made BY Insom. In fact, look at owen's quote - the link was added in support of a post about Insom, along with directions on how to discover specific information about her on the linked-to page. Clearly, the link was a Personal Information violation.

Just because it was not InsomniaRed's personal page, doesn't mean it didn't contain personal information about her.


but Insom herself did post her real name which enable you to make search and find her profile?

she posted her own info all over CC, including her IMDB link!!! this was not personal info!! and the boyfriend is not a member of CC!!! you are stretching. one has nothing to do with the other. he did not receive a warning for this, so it does not appy to this thread. you are now trolling by having posted about this over a half dozen times. you are now trolling this thread by CC's new standard!!!


Firstly, her profile is private, so I don't know how her boyfriend's information was found.
And Vace, if I post personal information about myself by posting a picture of myself, along with my name and my address, are you saying that it's acceptable for you then to search my name, find and post pictures of me being a drunken idiot at a bar with my arm around a woman other than my wife? That, sir, would be a stretch.


So, the girl at the bar, how was she?


Image
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: owenshooter

Postby Leehar on Sat Aug 20, 2011 6:35 am

Uncle Death wrote: I think that's reasonable. I just don't do it and then write a long explanation of why I did it. That is what happened regardless of past so called "offenses". If people were getting pissed why not just pm or call him out in the forums first? That wasn't done because somebody could use their power and get off on it.

But from what I understand it's been done before, many many times. There have been official discussions, unofficial discussions, and off-orbit completely in dead space discussions, owens seemingly never got it, and has always continued pushing every boundary he can think off. Someone mentioned earlier, that it was said team cc spends more time on him than anything else, and if thats the case then something needed to be done, and this incident was deemed worthy enough to do it?
For the most part even this thread has degenerated into a pissing contest...
show
User avatar
Colonel Leehar
 
Posts: 5491
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:12 pm
Location: Johannesburg

Re: owenshooter

Postby Victor Sullivan on Sat Aug 20, 2011 6:43 am

Leehar wrote:For the most part even this thread has degenerated into a pissing contest...

In the words of The Great Pumpkin Evil Semp, "Put them back in your pants, guys..."

-Sully
User avatar
Corporal Victor Sullivan
 
Posts: 6010
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:17 pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Re: owenshooter

Postby Qwert on Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:34 am

"War news:
Commynity vs Mods- Community start rioting ,because mods ban owenshoter, and in begining only few mods are in defensive positions, but after 8-9 pages of post, its look that supreme comander( he is in shadow) give order that more and more mods move into ofensive against comynity defending ban decision, so far not one mod defected to comunity, and situation step by step will move in mods advantage. Its expected that comunity riot will be crush in next few days"

Well i read what owen write, and probably because mine knowlege of english its low,i can not find reason for ban, probably some high mod become nervous with owen and urge that andy ban owen.
So exactly why was Owen given this ban?

Well, for the sake of openness let's take a look. he received an email stating:

Ahoy Owenshooter,

It looks like recently you've engaged in some specific trolling, RE your posts:
(the posts are quoted here for sake of brevity. Fc)

Re: *BpB Sig Contest/FREE PREMIUM*
Postby owenshooter on Tue Aug 16, 2011 1:49 am
owenshooter wrote:
how original... team CC has a contest where you sport a sig with a partner, one premium one freemium (doubling the exposure of the sig)... and if you win the drawing the premium gets a medal and the freemium gets 3 months of premium. how can our rag tag clan give away a year, and cc can only manage 3 months? wow!!!-0
Re: [Free Premium] Share the Warmth Epidemic 2011
Postby owenshooter on Tue Aug 16, 2011 1:51 am
owenshooter wrote:
wow... how is it that our rag tag clan can give away a free year premium to a freemium, and team CC can only manage 3 months? i applaud you for your efforts (i believe the bandits invented the sig contest concept on CC), but CC needs to step up in the prize dept. it looks bad when a bunch of forum renegades and kick ass players can muster together the funds to give away a year premium, and team cc gives away 3 months... you are better than this team CC!!!-0

p.s.-any freemium interested in a year, click on my sig...
Re: General Congratulations
Postby owenshooter on Tue Aug 16, 2011 1:54 am
owenshooter wrote:
congrats to the CC entertainment team for copying the bandits with a sig contest and upping the anty with a whole 3 month premium for the winner... oh wait, we always give away a full year!!! way to go team CC!!!-0
Re: General Congratulations
Postby owenshooter on Tue Aug 16, 2011 4:06 am
owenshooter wrote:
Crazyirishman wrote:
Congrats to the black jesus for forgetting that the CC team has done this for multiple years now, despite their yearning to mimic the BPB

Congrats to the CC entertainment team for making a contest that requires less effort/knowledge for the general populace.

PS- (your contest is still fun El Jesus Negro, nobody is trying to steal your thunder.)
congrats to the wee man for not knowing his CC history and that we have done this contest every year since cc's inception...-0
Re: General Congratulations
Postby owenshooter on Tue Aug 16, 2011 5:20 pm
owenshooter wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:
Congrats to the Entertainment Team and the Summer Bash.


--Andy
congrats to the summer bash starting almost 2 full months after the start of summer (june 21st)... and congrats to team CC for not ponying up more than 3 months of premium for a contest when clans and individuals have contests going now with a full premium for the prize... step it up CC, you are looking bad...-0
Re: [Free Premium] Share the Warmth Epidemic 2011
Postby owenshooter on Tue Aug 16, 2011 5:27 pm
owenshooter wrote:
samuelc812 wrote:
For the record owen, we are giving away a total of 2 years and 3 months in this entire event. We can offer more people prizes by splitting up what we've got, so we can make more people happy. But then again i know i shouldn't be wasting my breath explaining this to you, since by your own admission to me you argue for the sake of argument.

~Sam
hey, all i'm saying is others are giving away a full year, so you kind of look cheap... and not to mention summer started 2 months ago... anyway, knock yourself out!!! have fun!!-0

hmm, its look that im not so smart,because still i can not figure, what words caused 3 mont ban. :-s :?
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA

Re: owenshooter

Postby jbrettlip on Sat Aug 20, 2011 10:32 am

TheSaxlad wrote:Yes. Stating it once gets the point across, hell even state it once in the thread and create your own thread to discuss it with community members.

But not the same opinion posted in various different ways all across site in a small period of time.

one statement in the contest thread, followed by 2 responses and a "good luck" to team CC on the way out of the thread. 2 posts in OUR contest thread, followed by a response to a member. those 6 posts were in 16 hours. please explain to me how that is excessive. Serbia trolled this thread with an off topic accusation that owen never received a warning for and which occurred over a month ago, with far more posts in less than half the time over 4 pages, YESTERDAY!!!!! how are 6 posts, ON TOPIC, in 16 hours trolling? yet, 4 times as many posts in half the time in a one thread, off topic, is not? it makes no sense. and most of you are re-writing owen history, as he can not come in here and defend himself. it is funny how all the flaming, baiting and name calling continues against him, and he isn't even here to respond. andy pulled the trigger, because he had already gotten away with a 6 month made up ban against owen. seriously, 6 posts in 16 hours is trolling? on topic posts? half of them in our contest thread. makes no sense. the new CC standard has been set, and we have all seen Serbia already get away with murder according to andy's own standards. this is such a farce, it is barely laughable.
Image
nothing wrong with a little bit of man on dog love.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class jbrettlip
 
Posts: 1182
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:30 pm
Location: Ft. Worth, TX

PreviousNext

Return to Conquer Club Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users