Master Bush wrote:
For every MLK in this world, there is a Malcolm X who has been just as influential ,doing things others didn't find "honorable"
Yeah but they dont have a holiday for malcom X, therefore MLK in better.
Moderator: Community Team
Master Bush wrote:
For every MLK in this world, there is a Malcolm X who has been just as influential ,doing things others didn't find "honorable"
Master Bush wrote:Holidays are lame. Which one has the best movie made about him
-X
Uncle Death wrote:Master Bush wrote:Holidays are lame. Which one has the best movie made about him
-X
Why are so frivolous about an issue you have made so much about? This proves my point that you hurt the cause if you ever believed in it. Shame on you. You are nothing but an agent provocetuer helping the cause you proclaim to be against. Here you are spouting off and COF who had a good argument is left silenced.
Master Bush wrote:For every MLK in this world, there is a Malcolm X who has been just as influential ,doing things others didn't find "honorable"
owenshooter wrote:=D>![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Night Strike wrote:GLG complains about anyone who questions his form of play. The one comment that CoF was noted for making was completely clean and should have never even been noted, muchless used as a basis for a ban. But since GLG is favored by some of the mods, he goes whining and crying to them in order to get them to do his bidding (in this case banning those who disagree with him). If CoF made other bannable posts in that thread, they should have been recorded or at least linked to, because the only citation I can see is completely clean.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
it doesn't happen often, but i love when i agree with NS...-el Jesus negro
cachejob wrote:as far as CoF's ban, i don't know enough about the original posts to comment on it. however, CoF tends to be articulate and well spoken and is able to get his point across without resorting to bananable offenses.
trapyoung wrote:cachejob wrote:as far as CoF's ban, i don't know enough about the original posts to comment on it. however, CoF tends to be articulate and well spoken and is able to get his point across without resorting to bananable offenses.
In before Andy
nippersean wrote:Well this is just plain bollocks. Yeah COF's green shirt sucks balls. But can someone direct me to the offensive comments. Total bullshit. Ridiculous.
Chariot of Fire wrote:All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing
Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:NS has no clue to what he's talking about. He refers to a single post -- when there were 15. And me getting Mods to do my bidding?, people told me to "go fu-ck myself in social and not one of 2-3 mods present did a thing. All I ask is that rules get enforced when things get out of hand. Wanna debate BS NS?, Live Chat-PM, any place, any time.
Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:Let's see what hailstorm this one brings:
I applaud CC Global mods for enforcing the rules -- both for CoF and for MB.
-someone in that thread mentioned "we can 1) agree, 2) disagree, 3) act like a dick
- 1 & 2 are acceptable. . .doing 3 with 15 posts, and being warned to retract statements was more like 3.
Also:
1) While I found CoF to be quite literate, but "cheating. . .a liar. . . " are also definite trolls/baits/flames. Other than mentioning here, I'll ignore.
2) Also, the person that tried to spell my name is completely out of line as well.
3) continually saying that a high % of my games are against players with 6-20 games completed is so wrong -- but again, more trolling, flaiming, baiting.
NS has no clue to what he's talking about. He refers to a single post -- when there were 15. And me getting Mods to do my bidding?, people told me to "go fu-ck myself in social and not one of 2-3 mods present did a thing. All I ask is that rules get enforced when things get out of hand. Wanna debate BS NS?, Live Chat-PM, any place, any time.
Just as much BS are people that claim "the majority of CC disapproves.". The majority don't care. . .and many understand. They just are vocal crybabies.
Fine, I am not the strongest player on CC -- never said I was (by the way, great to see Kiron back). But I offer a game that for me offsets the tremendous odds (Loser/winnerx20) -- and work within the rules of CC. Complaining about someone playing withing the rules is childish.
When I was a little I spoke as a child, played like a child and complained like a child. When I became a man I put away childish things. Now, can I have my juicebox, cookies and then take a nap before recess?
Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:Fine, I am not the strongest player on CC -- never said I was (by the way, great to see Kiron back). But I offer a game that for me offsets the tremendous odds (Loser/winnerx20) -- and work within the rules of CC. Complaining about someone playing withing the rules is childish. But to rudely over-reply to a friendly well-wish WAS trolling (and baiting/flaming).
IR1SH ACE wrote:which I can kind of understand...it gets annoying the further up the ranking u go the more points u can lose to lower rank players but after looking into GLG's games more closely its very clear he has been doing this for over 3 years now.....![]()
I would pinpoint this game as the beginning of his SCAM to get to the top......Game 3374046 - 2008-10-01 00:50:15 - Game has been initialized
(3 months into GLG's CC career - Stats = 373 GP, score 1815)
so in 3 years he has gone from a score of 1815..... to 4953...I was not around 3 years ago but maybe back then 1815 points was top of the table sort of score and u needed to do as you say...."so I use whatever I can do to offset that"
I cant believe that the owner (lack) and his admins have allowed this to continue for so long and by constantly ignoring this SCAM they are setting a precedent for more players to take up the GLG way of playing CC....
very soon the Live Chat Call-outs will be like a saloon in a Wild West movie....all the COWBOYS sitting around waiting for some stranger to walk in...............
"Howdy partner your not from around these parts?"
Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:When I was a little I spoke as a child, played like a child and complained like a child. When I became a man I put away childish things. Now, can I have my juicebox, cookies and then take a nap before recess?
Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:Just as much BS are people that claim "the majority of CC disapproves.". The majority don't care. . .and many understand. They just are vocal crybabies.
Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:But I offer a game that for me offsets the tremendous odds (Loser/winnerx20) -- and work within the rules of CC.
Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:Let's see what hailstorm this one brings:
I applaud CC Global mods for enforcing the rules -- both for CoF and for MB.
-someone in that thread mentioned "we can 1) agree, 2) disagree, 3) act like a dick
- 1 & 2 are acceptable. . .doing 3 with 15 posts, and being warned to retract statements was more like 3.
Also:
1) While I found CoF to be quite literate, saying "cheating. . .a liar. . . " are also definite trolls/baits/flames. Other than mentioning here, I'll ignore.
2) Also, the person that tried to spell my name is completely out of line as well.
3) continually saying that a high % of my games are against players with 6-20 games completed is so wrong -- but again, more trolling, flaiming, baiting.
NS has no clue to what he's talking about. He refers to a single post -- when there were 15. And me getting Mods to do my bidding?, people told me to "go fu-ck myself in social and not one of 2-3 mods present did a thing. All I ask is that rules get enforced when things get out of hand. Wanna debate BS NS?, Live Chat-PM, any place, any time.
Just as much BS are people that claim "the majority of CC disapproves.". The majority don't care. . .and many understand. They just are vocal crybabies.
Fine, I am not the strongest player on CC -- never said I was (by the way, great to see Kiron back). But I offer a game that for me offsets the tremendous odds (Loser/winnerx20) -- and work within the rules of CC. Complaining about someone playing withing the rules is childish. But to rudely over-reply to a friendly well-wish WAS trolling (and baiting/flaming).
When I was a little I spoke as a child, played like a child and complained like a child. When I became a man I put away childish things. Now, can I have my juicebox, cookies and then take a nap before recess?
Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:Let's see what hailstorm this one brings:
I applaud CC Global mods for enforcing the rules -- both for CoF and for MB.
-someone in that thread mentioned "we can 1) agree, 2) disagree, 3) act like a dick
- 1 & 2 are acceptable. . .doing 3 with 15 posts, and being warned to retract statements was more like 3.
Also:
1) While I found CoF to be quite literate, saying "cheating. . .a liar. . . " are also definite trolls/baits/flames. Other than mentioning here, I'll ignore.
2) Also, the person that tried to spell my name is completely out of line as well.
3) continually saying that a high % of my games are against players with 6-20 games completed is so wrong -- but again, more trolling, flaiming, baiting.
NS has no clue to what he's talking about. He refers to a single post -- when there were 15. And me getting Mods to do my bidding?, people told me to "go fu-ck myself in social and not one of 2-3 mods present did a thing. All I ask is that rules get enforced when things get out of hand. Wanna debate BS NS?, Live Chat-PM, any place, any time.
Just as much BS are people that claim "the majority of CC disapproves.". The majority don't care. . .and many understand. They just are vocal crybabies.
Fine, I am not the strongest player on CC -- never said I was (by the way, great to see Kiron back). But I offer a game that for me offsets the tremendous odds (Loser/winnerx20) -- and work within the rules of CC. Complaining about someone playing withing the rules is childish. But to rudely over-reply to a friendly well-wish WAS trolling (and baiting/flaming).
When I was a little I spoke as a child, played like a child and complained like a child. When I became a man I put away childish things. Now, can I have my juicebox, cookies and then take a nap before recess?
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users