Moderator: Community Team
Timminz wrote:I once lost 967v1. Rage about that for a while.
L M S wrote:Number of Dice : 14002
Number of Attack Dice : 9242
Number of Defense Dice : 4760
Number of Rolls : 3256
Longest Streaks:
█: 7
█: 8
█: 18
Most Consecutive Troops Defeated: 27
Most Consecutive Troops Lost: 24
hairy potter wrote:i was playing a moderator and i had 100 and they had 2 and i lost and it was my 1 versus their 2 and i lost the game
barrycarter wrote:Probability of that happening is 1.18571*10^-26
hairy potter wrote:barrycarter wrote:Probability of that happening is 1.18571*10^-26
well then there is a probability
don't forget to take into account that the odds are stacked in the defender's favour.
barrycarter wrote:hairy potter wrote:barrycarter wrote:Probability of that happening is 1.18571*10^-26
well then there is a probability
don't forget to take into account that the odds are stacked in the defender's favour.
Well, there's ALWAYS a probability. However, ~10^-26 is way too low a probability to occur by chance (at least not consistently). And yes, the calculation takes that into consideration.
My thought: random.org is giving out random numbers, but the auto-assault part of CC's code is somehow misusing or re-using random numbers. If CC would release that code publicly (or to me under an NDA), we could review it.
Looking for patterns in streaks might help too.
owenshooter wrote:go ahead and report me, you will get nowhere...-0
hairy potter wrote:i was playing a moderator and i had 100 and they had 2 and i lost and it was my 1 versus their 2 and i lost the game
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users