Moderator: Community Team
jonty125 wrote:unvote saf has never been shy of voting inactives, so I'm sitting out of this wagon, and if the OP hasn't been updated then I pardon his ignorance of the replacement of James.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:Also, I like how you say you are "sitting out" of this bandwagon, but you didn't did you? SAYING you sat out, when in fact you voted and unvoted, is still joining the bandwagon... And as soon as you saw one or two others drop their vote, you quickly drop it and say You are sitting out.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.
Anarkistsdream wrote:jonty125 wrote:unvote saf has never been shy of voting inactives, so I'm sitting out of this wagon, and if the OP hasn't been updated then I pardon his ignorance of the replacement of James.
Hmmmm, care to show me all of these inactive voting instances? Because I have played more games than I can count with Safari, and I disagree. He ALWAYS chooses to replace. Because that is what a townie would do... Which is more reason to believe he is not in this game.
Also, I like how you say you are "sitting out" of this bandwagon, but you didn't did you? SAYING you sat out, when in fact you voted and unvoted, is still joining the bandwagon... And as soon as you saw one or two others drop their vote, you quickly drop it and say You are sitting out.
And the vote that was made on him wasn't due to his ignorance of a replacement for James, but how he reacted by the initial vote.
You and Safari are now the two most likely scum I have seen... And if I believed Saf a little more, than my vote would certainly be on you.
jonty125 wrote:unvote saf has never been shy of voting inactives, so I'm sitting out of this wagon, and if the OP hasn't been updated then I pardon his ignorance of the replacement of James.
kratos644 wrote:This is a decent case as far as D1 standards go. Blatant skimming and wanting to lynch instead of replace. If he's not scum I would guess he's a lyncher just based on him trying to force that lynch. This puts him at 3 votes and hopefully closer to a claim. unvote vote safari
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
benga wrote:unvote virus90
mtamburini wrote:Why does no one think I am mafia I have voted NL! No one has jumped on that. Everyone is pointing fingers at other people but not me. I find this highly suspicious that no one has voted for me. I understand that I have been inactive and its because I forgot to click on the button to let me know someone has posted but I am back mod adn ready to scumhunt.
Nebuchadnezer wrote:jonty125 wrote:unvote saf has never been shy of voting inactives, so I'm sitting out of this wagon, and if the OP hasn't been updated then I pardon his ignorance of the replacement of James.
At first, I thought jonty had voted safari, but he hasn't, so there's nothing to go on here.
The wagon fell apart rather quickly...I was hoping to establish at least some more leads.
As it stands, this sticks out to me a small bit...kratos644 wrote:This is a decent case as far as D1 standards go. Blatant skimming and wanting to lynch instead of replace. If he's not scum I would guess he's a lyncher just based on him trying to force that lynch. This puts him at 3 votes and hopefully closer to a claim. unvote vote safari
kratos is dealing with absolutes that safari must be either scum or a lyncher. There is the possibility that he is town.
I am still bothered by safariguy, a veteran of this game, and his boneheaded vote. I wonder if I'm cutting him too much slack. Would I/we crucify any other player for making this "mistake"? Probably. However, I'm not sure I want to force the policy claim, as I've seen other vets make stupid mistakes on mechanics as well.
So, all this talking for no action from me.
rishaed wrote:I am replacing Mtamburini, as soon as I can confirm a replacement, he has not posted since early joke voting stages which is unacceptable. Through the mass prod he has been warned, and I have not received a PM concerning the absence.
mtamburini wrote:Why does no one think I am mafia I have voted NL! No one has jumped on that. Everyone is pointing fingers at other people but not me. I find this highly suspicious that no one has voted for me. I understand that I have been inactive and its because I forgot to click on the button to let me know someone has posted but I am back mod adn ready to scumhunt.
safariguy5 wrote:Nebuchadnezer wrote:jonty125 wrote:unvote saf has never been shy of voting inactives, so I'm sitting out of this wagon, and if the OP hasn't been updated then I pardon his ignorance of the replacement of James.
At first, I thought jonty had voted safari, but he hasn't, so there's nothing to go on here.
The wagon fell apart rather quickly...I was hoping to establish at least some more leads.
As it stands, this sticks out to me a small bit...kratos644 wrote:This is a decent case as far as D1 standards go. Blatant skimming and wanting to lynch instead of replace. If he's not scum I would guess he's a lyncher just based on him trying to force that lynch. This puts him at 3 votes and hopefully closer to a claim. unvote vote safari
kratos is dealing with absolutes that safari must be either scum or a lyncher. There is the possibility that he is town.
I am still bothered by safariguy, a veteran of this game, and his boneheaded vote. I wonder if I'm cutting him too much slack. Would I/we crucify any other player for making this "mistake"? Probably. However, I'm not sure I want to force the policy claim, as I've seen other vets make stupid mistakes on mechanics as well.
So, all this talking for no action from me.
Ultimately, the case on me was based on Meta. If I was Doom and said something you didn't like, that would be par for the course. However, if I was Doom, and uncommonly courteous, would that warrant a vote as well?
I will FoS kratos for his assumption that I was mafia or lyncher. Mafia I could understand, but it seems odd to accuse lyncher. 13 man game is a bit too small to support lyncher in my opinion, and this is before getting into the discussion about when the right time is for a lyncher to push a bandwagon on the target.
I can state the obvious however and say that straight voting the target on Day 1 is most definitely not a good lyncher play WIFOM or not...
jonty125 wrote:rishaed wrote:I am replacing Mtamburini, as soon as I can confirm a replacement, he has not posted since early joke voting stages which is unacceptable. Through the mass prod he has been warned, and I have not received a PM concerning the absence.mtamburini wrote:Why does no one think I am mafia I have voted NL! No one has jumped on that. Everyone is pointing fingers at other people but not me. I find this highly suspicious that no one has voted for me. I understand that I have been inactive and its because I forgot to click on the button to let me know someone has posted but I am back mod adn ready to scumhunt.
Hmm, concidence. I think not, and his reason for not posting is he "forgot to click on the button to let him know someone has posted". Is anyone else slightly clueless about what this means vote mtamburini
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:jonty125 wrote:rishaed wrote:I am replacing Mtamburini, as soon as I can confirm a replacement, he has not posted since early joke voting stages which is unacceptable. Through the mass prod he has been warned, and I have not received a PM concerning the absence.mtamburini wrote:Why does no one think I am mafia I have voted NL! No one has jumped on that. Everyone is pointing fingers at other people but not me. I find this highly suspicious that no one has voted for me. I understand that I have been inactive and its because I forgot to click on the button to let me know someone has posted but I am back mod adn ready to scumhunt.
Hmm, concidence. I think not, and his reason for not posting is he "forgot to click on the button to let him know someone has posted". Is anyone else slightly clueless about what this means vote mtamburini
He also didn't mention that he received a PM, as we ALL did... As I just looked and, indeed, his name was on it.
So... If this is his first or second game, you would think he would WANT to participate... He doesn't have the experience, unless he has played elsewhere, to scummarine like that... And, he also would not be an effective Jester.
So.................. I am going with reverse REVERSE reverse psychology...
Vote: mtamburini
mtamburini wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:jonty125 wrote:rishaed wrote:I am replacing Mtamburini, as soon as I can confirm a replacement, he has not posted since early joke voting stages which is unacceptable. Through the mass prod he has been warned, and I have not received a PM concerning the absence.mtamburini wrote:Why does no one think I am mafia I have voted NL! No one has jumped on that. Everyone is pointing fingers at other people but not me. I find this highly suspicious that no one has voted for me. I understand that I have been inactive and its because I forgot to click on the button to let me know someone has posted but I am back mod adn ready to scumhunt.
Hmm, concidence. I think not, and his reason for not posting is he "forgot to click on the button to let him know someone has posted". Is anyone else slightly clueless about what this means vote mtamburini
He also didn't mention that he received a PM, as we ALL did... As I just looked and, indeed, his name was on it.
So... If this is his first or second game, you would think he would WANT to participate... He doesn't have the experience, unless he has played elsewhere, to scummarine like that... And, he also would not be an effective Jester.
So.................. I am going with reverse REVERSE reverse psychology...
Vote: mtamburini
I am ready to post something, but would like to hear others opinions on this matter of me being scum.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:mtamburini wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:jonty125 wrote:rishaed wrote:I am replacing Mtamburini, as soon as I can confirm a replacement, he has not posted since early joke voting stages which is unacceptable. Through the mass prod he has been warned, and I have not received a PM concerning the absence.mtamburini wrote:Why does no one think I am mafia I have voted NL! No one has jumped on that. Everyone is pointing fingers at other people but not me. I find this highly suspicious that no one has voted for me. I understand that I have been inactive and its because I forgot to click on the button to let me know someone has posted but I am back mod adn ready to scumhunt.
Hmm, concidence. I think not, and his reason for not posting is he "forgot to click on the button to let him know someone has posted". Is anyone else slightly clueless about what this means vote mtamburini
He also didn't mention that he received a PM, as we ALL did... As I just looked and, indeed, his name was on it.
So... If this is his first or second game, you would think he would WANT to participate... He doesn't have the experience, unless he has played elsewhere, to scummarine like that... And, he also would not be an effective Jester.
So.................. I am going with reverse REVERSE reverse psychology...
Vote: mtamburini
I am ready to post something, but would like to hear others opinions on this matter of me being scum.
How about you post something about the two people who have already accused you?
Don't drag the fucking day out... The method I see you presently using is "I'm just going to screw with the people playing and not try to play myself." Your job is to help town find scum, or, if you are scum, to kill all the town... When the only posts you have made are completely void of content and do nothing to progress the game, you are not giving people a very good impression.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:OK... I assume English isn't your first language... If it is... YIKES!
Why is the PM relevant to bring up? One, because, if you hadn't RECEIVED the PM, it may be understandable that you had forgotten about the game... Two, because the length of time it takes you to respond to a PM when it is prodding you to post is important... You play Risk, so you must at least log on twice a day to take your turns, assuming you are a good teammate and player, which, judging from your rank, you are... So why the time between the prod and your actual post?
If you are playing in three games and can't keep up, maybe it is time to ask to be replaced? Playing in three games for me is not that hard, and I am usually one of the most active players in ALL the games...
Third, I curse... a lot... In games, in RL, at work... I already DO tone it down for this, so, when I see someone being blatantly void of content in their posts, it pisses me off. This isn't "Annoy the other players around you." It is Mafia... Even this post I am responding to is fairly devoid of content... You just blanket that BOTH players who voted you MUST be mafia with complete assumptions that prove you obviously didn't read the arguments made against you. You also say you see mafia "potentially in both of us," but your rebuke is just stating that both of us MUST be mafia... So which is it?
If this is your concept of playing this game, expect to be lynched early and often...
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:You are CONVINCED that one of us COULD be mafia? Wow, thank you, Capt Obvious... ANYONE can be mafia, so saying you are convinced ONE of us COULD be is perhaps one of the most idiotic things I have ever read. You have given me no reason to unvote you, and if I turn you off about playing other games I am in, I can't say I am disappointed, because your play style sucks...
How about you actually read through the posts and make a rational argument, instead of gross generalizations, assumptions and nonsense?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users