Moderator: Community Team
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.
benga wrote:Gosh everything feels scummy, to say at least.
Not sure did mtamburini just flush out some scum (I assume that is maybe his intention) or he is scum himself (playing with our minds).
Need to re-read things once more
safariguy5 wrote:To go back to your idea of town pressuring a scum buddy mtamburini, that would be true had the wagon on me gathered any steam. However, vote pressure was already subsiding, and therefore no wagon to divert.
On a more direct note, if indeed town was pressuring the scumbuddy, doesn't that mean you believe me to be mafia? In which case why are you not saying/voting/accusing me but instead believe that the two people who are voting you are mafia?
unvote vote mtamburini
mtamburini wrote:safariguy5 wrote:To go back to your idea of town pressuring a scum buddy mtamburini, that would be true had the wagon on me gathered any steam. However, vote pressure was already subsiding, and therefore no wagon to divert.
On a more direct note, if indeed town was pressuring the scumbuddy, doesn't that mean you believe me to be mafia? In which case why are you not saying/voting/accusing me but instead believe that the two people who are voting you are mafia?
unvote vote mtamburini
Im actually linking you safari with jonty, he unvoted (even though it was not on you) and defended you as you got to 3 votes against you. Now the both of you have hopped onto me and started another BW train which is totally fine with me gives town more information today and in later days.
I would put you guys in a mafia circle.
My reads on narc are now changing, although I thought he was being rude and extremely defensive when I acted towards him in the manner that I did, I am not seeing it more as a frustrated townie than a defensive mafia. My play has been unconventional to say the least, but I have stirred up some activity now which is great to help us find scum. I would like to hear more on the others who have not spoke in a few days and hear their opinion on the matter but I am content in staying at L-3 or L-2 in the off chance we have a double voter and lynches me without knowing.
HotShot53 wrote:is it possible mtamburini has some kind of role where his goal is to get lynched? because it sure looks like he's trying his hardest... I have no idea about him except his posts are very weird.
For now I will leave my vote where it is though, since I still think safariguy had stronger scum tells for now
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
The Weird One wrote:HotShot53 wrote:is it possible mtamburini has some kind of role where his goal is to get lynched? because it sure looks like he's trying his hardest... I have no idea about him except his posts are very weird.
For now I will leave my vote where it is though, since I still think safariguy had stronger scum tells for now
It's possible. The role you are thinking of is named jester...it generally wins through being lynched...This is off of memory, though...The likelihood of this, however, is anyone's guess...
mtamburini wrote:I am ready to post something, but would like to hear others opinions on this matter of me being scum.
mtamburini wrote: As per the 2 votes against me so far, I see mafia between one of them or potentially both of them.
[a short while later]
1st case. [jonty125] My first vote is from mafia because town was pressuring one of his "partners" and to get us off of them he puts forward that I am an easy lynch today and makes up a somewhat reasonable but not that reasonable response. My actions have been clear up to this point so you casting suspicion on me seems scummy.
2nd case. [Nark] My second vote against me is from mafia because he sees a townie puts pressure on me for acting scummy (even though I have explained myself) and BW votes in hope more townies + their partners jump on to get an easy lynch and go into the night with another chance to get rid of another townie.
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.
HotShot53 wrote:is it possible mtamburini has some kind of role where his goal is to get lynched? because it sure looks like he's trying his hardest... I have no idea about him except his posts are very weird.
For now I will leave my vote where it is though, since I still think safariguy had stronger scum tells for now
Melkor52 wrote:HotShot53 wrote:is it possible mtamburini has some kind of role where his goal is to get lynched? because it sure looks like he's trying his hardest... I have no idea about him except his posts are very weird.
For now I will leave my vote where it is though, since I still think safariguy had stronger scum tells for now
My first joke vote caused such a stir that I have been trying to get the feel of a Mafia game before posting again. I don't have much experience trying to uncover scum, but from what I have read so far I agree with HotShot53.
UnVote, Vote: mtamburini
HotShot53 wrote:Melkor52 wrote:HotShot53 wrote:is it possible mtamburini has some kind of role where his goal is to get lynched? because it sure looks like he's trying his hardest... I have no idea about him except his posts are very weird.
For now I will leave my vote where it is though, since I still think safariguy had stronger scum tells for now
My first joke vote caused such a stir that I have been trying to get the feel of a Mafia game before posting again. I don't have much experience trying to uncover scum, but from what I have read so far I agree with HotShot53.
UnVote, Vote: mtamburini
If you fully agreed with me, you would have voted for safariguy lol
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
gregwolf121 wrote:the reason i haven't been posting is that i was taking finals, i'm going to finish them today so i'll be able to post more regularly, and contribute starting tomorrow.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:HotShot53 wrote:Melkor is a skimming skimmer... FOS Melkor
Melkor52 wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:HotShot53 wrote:Melkor is a skimming skimmer... FOS Melkor
OMGUS Anarkistsdream. Every time I post anything you jump in with crap. You better hope I'm not a Vig.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
HotShot53 wrote:Melkor52 wrote:HotShot53 wrote:is it possible mtamburini has some kind of role where his goal is to get lynched? because it sure looks like he's trying his hardest... I have no idea about him except his posts are very weird.
For now I will leave my vote where it is though, since I still think safariguy had stronger scum tells for now
My first joke vote caused such a stir that I have been trying to get the feel of a Mafia game before posting again. I don't have much experience trying to uncover scum, but from what I have read so far I agree with HotShot53.
UnVote, Vote: mtamburini
If you fully agreed with me, you would have voted for safariguy lol
Melkor52 wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:HotShot53 wrote:Melkor is a skimming skimmer... FOS Melkor
OMGUS Anarkistsdream. Every time I post anything you jump in with crap. You better hope I'm not a Vig.
UNVOTE Are you stupid or just scum? He's already at L-2...and you put him at L-1? Holy cow...Now you're screaming to be voted...TheForgivenOne wrote:Melkor52 wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:HotShot53 wrote:Melkor is a skimming skimmer... FOS Melkor
OMGUS Anarkistsdream. Every time I post anything you jump in with crap. You better hope I'm not a Vig.
Well.. he has a point, you know
Based on your posts so far, i am tempted to keep my vote on you, but mtamburini is just.. it's hard to explain. His explanations are just sketchy, at best. He basically OMGUS's both the people who vote him (Side question, does that make anyone that votes you scum? Because that really seems to be your rational). Then when he realizes that this tactic isn't working.. he backtracks on it.
Unvote Vote: mtamburini
Users browsing this forum: No registered users