Gustaf Wasa wrote:He didn't say it wasn't a woman, just that it could be either way. So he wants us to read LESS into the night scenes, not more.
Well prior to this, we never assumed that it was a woman. In fact I think the only information we agreed to glean out of it was that there were 2 kills, and we disregarded any other information. aage's correction of the information given in the Night scene does suggest that it might have misled us.
As the topic we had been discussing in relation to N3's scene was
how the kill attempts were foiled, and many were contending that it's hard to imagine anything more than roleblocking and doctoring, I do believe that aage meant to hint that bulletproof is a possible cause of a failed kill attempt. Meaning that I do believe that blake's claim is the truth.
jonty125 wrote:I agree that the other night actions paint blake in a bad light, but I still feel animaniacks, dropped a clanger AND is asking people to claim left right and centre.
I only
suggested we push for a claim from Hank, more like a, "Should we get him to claim?" rather than a, "Guys, Hank totally needs to claim". And I've already admitted, if this was a wrong move, then I'm sorry and apologise. In any case, Hank did not claim in the end. Please tell me how this means I'm asking people to "claim left right and centre"???
Witt is the one now asking me to claim! Exactly the same situation that made you start breathing down my neck - 'pushing' for a lynch at L-3. Why aren't you questioning him about it, at all? jonty is being highly unreasonable and trying to put a case on me when there isn't any. I mean, honestly, is anyone else seeing this???