Moderator: Community Team
He has been here a long time. If some noob was doing this we would obviously just leave him alone and let him hang or clear himself with his later actions. However, this madness is going to ruin later days if he is left alive, even if he is telling the truth. I mean, letting his actions be directed? He is just a scum trying to draw it out to let his faction get in a few more kills.lord voldemort wrote: Maybe he is just bad?
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
vodean wrote:why dont you announce who you are gonna target. that way we can use them to confirm it.
safariguy5 wrote:Honestly, I see no reason why Hippo would believe that edoc is scum. It's a huge and very risky WIFOM to fake a Friendly Neighbor claim and get your scummates to play along. If you get outted, you just handed all your scummates over. I don't see that as a possibility and I cannot fathom how/why else edoc would be faking a friendly neighbor claim. As such, your case on edoc is an attempt to redirect pressure to me hippo, and I'm not buying it.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
ShaggyDan wrote:vodean wrote:why dont you announce who you are gonna target. that way we can use them to confirm it.
Vote Vodean
... such a scummy idea. Absolutely no good can come from announcing the tracking target. What does knowing the target give to town? The only potential I can see is if a watcher would then also target Jonty, which honestly is a big waste. It opens up so many more doors for scum. Roleblocking, busdriving, killing the target all spring to mind.
The only reason I think you would have for suggesting this is if you wanted to bus-drive his target with someone else and get Hippo lynched (assuming that Hippo is actually a tracker, which I am willing to wait another day on).
The votes more just there because I was floating around without a stance. I don't believe Hippo but I'm willing to wait another day on it. Vodean strikes me as scummy.
thehippo8 wrote:@ SHaggy, Vode & nag - so who do you suggest that I target? Or shall I just keep that to myself and then advise my results as soon as day begins (assuming I don't get night killed).
nagerous wrote:thehippo8 wrote:@ SHaggy, Vode & nag - so who do you suggest that I target? Or shall I just keep that to myself and then advise my results as soon as day begins (assuming I don't get night killed).
Keep it yourself and share the results tomorrow, if you're lying the truth will quickly out.
elonpuckhog wrote:Jonty makes a good point about lynching an inactive. I just think its too late for that since the deadline is tomorrow, I think. We need to lynch someone today, so vote thehippo8.
elonpuckhog wrote:Having read over the thread, I think that hippo is still the most scummy. I don't understand the wait and see mentality on hippo, or how we will know for sure tomorrow whether he is lying (that may be the noob in me talking). I'm almost ready to vote him, but I'm not ready to do so quite yet. What I will do is Unvote. I'm not convinced on DJ anymore. Nothing really new to add to my hippo argument, other than I will wait a little longer to be convinced that he could prove himself tomorrow. At this point, I don't see the point in waiting.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
strike wolf wrote:The only flaw with proving himself tomorrow is if he is cult recruiter and has his recruitee vouch for him or if he is mafia and a scum mate vouches for him.
jonty125 wrote:strike wolf wrote:The only flaw with proving himself tomorrow is if he is cult recruiter and has his recruitee vouch for him or if he is mafia and a scum mate vouches for him.
Or other investigatives can confirm/rumble him
aage wrote:jonty125 wrote:strike wolf wrote:The only flaw with proving himself tomorrow is if he is cult recruiter and has his recruitee vouch for him or if he is mafia and a scum mate vouches for him.
Or other investigatives can confirm/rumble him
The doc is dead and you want to confirm supposedly investigative roles by making other investigative roles claim?
redhedge47 wrote:Ack confusion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users