Moderator: Cartographers
cairnswk wrote:NIce to see you thinking outside the box.
Since you're refering to diplomacy, get rid of all references to attack, assault etc, and use perhaps overcome or persuaded....simply words that fit the map better.
cairnswk wrote:NIce to see you thinking outside the box.
:idea: Since you're refering to diplomacy, get rid of all references to attack, assault etc, and use perhaps overcome or persuaded....simply words that fit the map better.
x-raider wrote:Great original idea.
I think I might have to stare at it for an hour before I could play it.
P.S. I think you mean "exclusion of the USA" in the OP.
ManBungalow wrote:Egypt, Canada, India, South Africa and possibly others don't have their official flag. Is there a reason for this?
koontz1973 wrote:cairnswk wrote:NIce to see you thinking outside the box.
I can never tell when you are being sarcastic, but I will take this as a compliment.
cairnswk wrote:koontz1973 wrote:cairnswk wrote:NIce to see you thinking outside the box.
I can never tell when you are being sarcastic, but I will take this as a compliment.
koontz...if someone is giving me a "hard time", i will be sarcastic...otherwise you should always look positively to my comments <- for future reference eh?
ManBungalow wrote:Right, right - I didn't realise you based this on a historical event.
ManBungalow wrote:So,
I don't understand what "junction _ connects to junction _" means.
Attack routes along the back channels..."countries can negotiate with the next one along diplomatic back channels". I think I understand, but I'm not 100% here.
Let's take Greece, for example. The borders I think it has:
Germany
Bulgaria
Canada
Hungary
Is this accurate?
Spelling: deligation = delegation.
"Control all non-civilian areas to win". Does this mean that one can hold all of the green areas - except the village-y regions - in the middle in order to win?
Also, you have a little area of something that looks like a barcode at the extreme bottom border of the map image. On both sides.
BluU wrote:Some other flags you need to change so they will meet the history timeframe:
Persia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_ ... 910%29.svg
Afghanistan: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_afghanistan
I think : Arginitina should be Argentina
I think Russia should be listed as USSR. If you keep Russia, you should change the flag.
koontz1973 wrote:In fact we are both wrong on the flag Oneyed. Your one is for 1918-1925. That is to late in the time line as the League was around 1916.
koontz1973 wrote:This should be the correct one. The dates are 1883-1918.
koontz1973 wrote:The connections where mainly done for European powers, blocs of influence, trading partners at the time. Some others where added to balance game play. But more than will for you to suggest adding or taking away of any if it helps.
Oneyed wrote:sorry me, but many states did not exist in 1916... maybe move the date after World War I or add there relevant states?
I thought that date is after WWI when I look at states. then this is valid flag from 1914 - 1917, I think.
I do not understand why for example UK has not connection to India (its colony)? will look more into this when will be more clear date or states.
Oneyed
Return to Melting Pot: Map Ideas
Users browsing this forum: No registered users