Moderator: Cartographers




































oaktown wrote:my immediate reaction to this is: don't we already have enough maps of Europe?
oaktown wrote:As for having a map with no region bonuses; sure, why not. Think about working the XML so you get a bonus placement army for every two territories you own rather than three to make expansion more attractive.















oak wrote:my immediate reaction to this is: don't we already have enough maps of Europe?




















oaktown wrote:As for having a map with no region bonuses; sure, why not. Think about working the XML so you get a bonus placement army for every two territories you own rather than three to make expansion more attractive.




















oaktown wrote:As for having a map with no region bonuses; sure, why not. Think about working the XML so you get a bonus placement army for every two territories you own rather than three to make expansion more attractive.
BrianHoef wrote:oaktown wrote:As for having a map with no region bonuses; sure, why not. Think about working the XML so you get a bonus placement army for every two territories you own rather than three to make expansion more attractive.
I definitely agree with making expansion more attractive. Is the general feeling that a 1:1 ratio of armies to territories is a) too high and b) leaves too much up to chance? If y'all are of that opinion, I'll go for the 1:2 ratio.

































snufkin wrote:would love a good historical map of europe..
but CC already has a fantasy europe map with time rifts. (the one called europe)
Do we really need another fictitious map of europe?
better imo if you skip the sci-fi and choose an interesting epoch from history















































TaCktiX wrote:Map gameplay is different on this map, with no continents.
Petty States refers to the small non-Empire powers and influences at the time. They didn't have sovereignty over their realms, but they certainly weren't ignorable.






bryguy wrote:This confuses me...
p.s. i havent really read the thread (other than the first post)



















MrBenn wrote:bryguy wrote:This confuses me...
p.s. i havent really read the thread (other than the first post)
Ignore Bryguy - he talks a load of rubbish sometimes






















































Return to Melting Pot: Map Ideas
Users browsing this forum: No registered users