sailorseal wrote:The community voted yes, lets see this happen
Might I also mention that you have not managed to come up with a reply to any of the problems I pointed out.
Moderator: Community Team
sailorseal wrote:The community voted yes, lets see this happen
The Neon Peon wrote:sailorseal wrote:The community voted yes, lets see this happen
Might I also mention that you have not managed to come up with a reply to any of the problems I pointed out.
sailorseal wrote:The Neon Peon wrote:sailorseal wrote:The community voted yes, lets see this happen
Might I also mention that you have not managed to come up with a reply to any of the problems I pointed out.
Alright name the problems lets see what I say
The Neon Peon wrote:sailorseal wrote:The Neon Peon wrote:sailorseal wrote:The community voted yes, lets see this happen
Might I also mention that you have not managed to come up with a reply to any of the problems I pointed out.
Alright name the problems lets see what I say
Why don't you read your own thread?
sailorseal wrote:Went through the whole thing you only tell em to improve my search skills and that you are not a farmer
The Neon Peon wrote:1. Separating ranked and unranked games... that defeats the purpose of rank. Rank is how good you are at playing the game. If you separate that, then people will only play on 1 single type of game for rank, and then play all other games as unranked. Right now, if I choose to specialize that much, I give up 99% of the good things about the site. If this suggestion comes through, specialists will be giving up absolutely nothing.
2. If you care so much about score that you do not join some games because you do not want to lose your points, then you have to really rethink a lot of things. If you want to join a game with a friend, go ahead. If you want to join a flat rate 2 man doodle and a cook has started one, you might as well find enjoyment in CC and play it rather than stick to one game type.
3. Unranked games will cause a lot of problems.
Firstly there is the problem of freemium members (not all, but some is enough). You have only 4 games that you can play... you join some unranked games, and every time you no longer have a chance, you simply suicide into the player you like least and then you can play another game. Would be fun to be that other player, Wouldn't it?
Secondly, not all the people on the site are, well... nice. In unranked games, if I don't like you, all I have to do is join your game, throw the game by attacking only you the entire match, resulting in an unpleasant experience for you, and no cost for me. There are a lot of people that do not like someone else on the site, and a heck of a lot of do this since they accomplish their goal of giving you a bad time yet do not lose their points and become cooks like they would these days.
I am not saying that people would stop playing to win, no doubt many people would continue to do so. But even if this is a minority that you encounter every 1 in 20 games, do you think you'll have much fun having someone like I just described above do that to you that often?
sailorseal wrote:I don't see how this gives me anything to change
The Neon Peon wrote:1. Separating ranked and unranked games... that defeats the purpose of rank. Rank is how good you are at playing the game. If you separate that, then people will only play on 1 single type of game for rank, and then play all other games as unranked. Right now, if I choose to specialize that much, I give up 99% of the good things about the site. If this suggestion comes through, specialists will be giving up absolutely nothing.
The Neon Peon wrote:2. If you care so much about score that you do not join some games because you do not want to lose your points, then you have to really rethink a lot of things. If you want to join a game with a friend, go ahead. If you want to join a flat rate 2 man doodle and a cook has started one, you might as well find enjoyment in CC and play it rather than stick to one game type.
The Neon Peon wrote:3. Unranked games will cause a lot of problems.
Firstly there is the problem of freemium members (not all, but some is enough). You have only 4 games that you can play... you join some unranked games, and every time you no longer have a chance, you simply suicide into the player you like least and then you can play another game. Would be fun to be that other player, Wouldn't it?
The Neon Peon wrote:Secondly, not all the people on the site are, well... nice. In unranked games, if I don't like you, all I have to do is join your game, throw the game by attacking only you the entire match, resulting in an unpleasant experience for you, and no cost for me. There are a lot of people that do not like someone else on the site, and a heck of a lot of do this since they accomplish their goal of giving you a bad time yet do not lose their points and become cooks like they would these days.
The Neon Peon wrote:I am not saying that people would stop playing to win, no doubt many people would continue to do so. But even if this is a minority that you encounter every 1 in 20 games, do you think you'll have much fun having someone like I just described above do that to you that often?
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
wolfpack0530 wrote:2 months ago 1 had 800 points, now i am a major. I play anyone at anytime. experience is the ONLY deciding factor, the rest (drop + dice) is all luck.
PLAYER57832 wrote:wolfpack0530 wrote:2 months ago 1 had 800 points, now i am a major. I play anyone at anytime. experience is the ONLY deciding factor, the rest (drop + dice) is all luck.
Experience and the types of games you play. Anyone playing 1 vs 1, is not going to go up as quickly or readily as those playing 8 player or team games, just becuase of how points are distributed and the luck factor.
(that, is in case anyone doesn't know what I mean, in 8 player, you can win 1 and lose 7, but still come out ahead in points, unless the only games you win are against cooks or some such. To go up in 1 vs 1, you have to win not just a majority of games, but you have to win against players who have equal or higher ranks and not lose to many of those who are lower in rank )
PLAYER57832 wrote:Experience and the types of games you play. Anyone playing 1 vs 1, is not going to go up as quickly or readily as those playing 8 player or team games, just becuase of how points are distributed and the luck factor.
Tupence wrote:There is also a Map Explorers usergroup, where members play games against each other on maps that they don't know very well, so they can be sure they won't get completely destroyed by an expert. They also play some team games to teach each other new maps.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users