[Rules] [GO] Option for Players to Set, Stake or Bet Points

Have any bright ideas? Share and discuss them with the community

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

And don't forget to search for previously suggested ideas first!
User avatar
Mitch.Bina
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:44 pm

Post by Mitch.Bina »

aahhh and what was the outcome?
User avatar
hecter
Posts: 14632
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:27 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Tying somebody up on the third floor
Contact:

Post by hecter »

Well, I imagine it was put on the To Do list…
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
Image
User avatar
Mitch.Bina
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:44 pm

Post by Mitch.Bina »

hhhmm i just read the to-do list and didnt see any ante point system otherwise i wouldnt have posted
User avatar
hecter
Posts: 14632
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:27 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Tying somebody up on the third floor
Contact:

Post by hecter »

Ya… They really need to update it…
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
Image
User avatar
Keredrex
Posts: 400
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:41 am
Gender: Male
Location: New York

Ante

Post by Keredrex »

I Agree... It could make a gambling option to the games...

i would love to make a game and play for 20 or even 100 points flat....
it could help you manage your rank progression....

Make a poll
User avatar
AK_iceman
Posts: 5704
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:39 pm

Post by AK_iceman »

I like the idea, but 100 points is too much. Maybe 20 points max per game...
User avatar
mibi
Posts: 3350
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: The Great State of Vermont
Contact:

Post by mibi »

great idea but 20 points max? thats lame. 100 points max. and it should only be for private games other wise there will be too much bitching.
User avatar
Keredrex
Posts: 400
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:41 am
Gender: Male
Location: New York

100 Points MAX

Post by Keredrex »

mibi wrote:great idea but 20 points max? thats lame. 100 points max. and it should only be for private games other wise there will be too much bitching.



I think If the Players want to 100 points is a good maximum.... It gives the Generals and Other high ranks a game that could actually hurt there ranks instead of many games
User avatar
AK_iceman
Posts: 5704
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:39 pm

Re: 100 Points MAX

Post by AK_iceman »

Keredrex wrote:
mibi wrote:great idea but 20 points max? thats lame. 100 points max. and it should only be for private games other wise there will be too much bitching.



I think If the Players want to 100 points is a good maximum.... It gives the Generals and Other high ranks a game that could actually hurt there ranks instead of many games

Or a game that people could abuse to get high scores.
100 per person in a 6 player game would leave the winner with 500 extra points. Win a couple of those and you're a General. I know we have the Battle Royales, but those aren't common and it doesn't disrupt the balance of points very much.
User avatar
sully800
Posts: 4978
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Post by sully800 »

Also, think of what already existing cheaters would do with such a system. Someone could create a few multis, bet the max and be up thousands of points in no time. Point ante games would completely overturn the current poitn system, and not in a good way. Of course we could eventually catch people who were cheating the system, but would it be fun watching someone shoot up to 5000 points on the scoreboard and then getting busted? The scoreboard would become a joke.
User avatar
lackattack
Posts: 6097
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:34 pm
Location: Montreal, QC

Post by lackattack »

this isn't happeneing. i think score is more meaningful when it exclusively comes from a consistent formula.
User avatar
Keredrex
Posts: 400
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:41 am
Gender: Male
Location: New York

Re: 100 Points MAX

Post by Keredrex »

AK_iceman wrote:
Keredrex wrote:
mibi wrote:great idea but 20 points max? thats lame. 100 points max. and it should only be for private games other wise there will be too much bitching.



I think If the Players want to 100 points is a good maximum.... It gives the Generals and Other high ranks a game that could actually hurt there ranks instead of many games

Or a game that people could abuse to get high scores.
100 per person in a 6 player game would leave the winner with 500 extra points. Win a couple of those and you're a General. I know we have the Battle Royales, but those aren't common and it doesn't disrupt the balance of points very much.


No I mean 100 Points Flat not per person..... and If all the players want to Then Who Cares its on them .... If people don't want to ante that much ... Don't join the Game....
ParadiceCity9
Posts: 4239
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 4:10 pm

Wager games

Post by ParadiceCity9 »

Mainly for 2 player games. The players can wager the amount of points they are willing the bet on the game.
Spritzking
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:19 pm
Gender: Male

Post by Spritzking »

this has already been rejected

it is to much in for, well you are my friend, we both bet 500 points and i lose against you....
ChaoticWraith
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 3:16 pm

PotLuck and a game type

Post by ChaoticWraith »

<Body>:

* Suggestion Idea: potluck tourneys

* Specifics: more than 6 players can donate 20 points to the pot to enter the tourney or a specified amount and whoever comes out standing through a knockout gets all the points from pot.
* Why it is needed: Gives a bigger incentive to get first place in the tournaments as more points are at stake if you do win.

* Priority** (1-5): 1


other notes: how about adding a game type in which people win after a specified number of rounds based on the number of countries they own and how big their army is. If you want to know a name how about conquerer mode.
User avatar
magneticgoop
Posts: 851
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:03 pm
Location: Screaming at the TV as Norv Turner turns the chargers into the worst team in the NFL =(

Post by magneticgoop »

interesting pretty good idea maybe even as an option in all game types
User avatar
pancakemix
Posts: 7973
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:39 pm
Gender: Male
Location: The Grim Guzzler

Post by pancakemix »

It has potential for abuse by multis, though. Two multis put in all their points and deadbeat. It could be dangerous.
Epic Win

"Always tell the truth. It's the easiest thing to remember." - Richard Roma, Glengarry Glen Ross
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
User avatar
alex_white101
Posts: 1992
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:05 am

Post by alex_white101 »

pancakemix wrote:It has potential for abuse by multis, though. Two multis put in all their points and deadbeat. It could be dangerous.


thats exactly the same as a multi starting a 3 player and letting the other 2 deadbeat. u cannot stop and new ideas from fear of multis.......
''Many a true word is spoken in jest''
User avatar
Fircoal
Posts: 19422
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 8:53 pm
Location: Abusing Silleh Buizels

Post by Fircoal »

alex_white101 wrote:
pancakemix wrote:It has potential for abuse by multis, though. Two multis put in all their points and deadbeat. It could be dangerous.


thats exactly the same as a multi starting a 3 player and letting the other 2 deadbeat. u cannot stop and new ideas from fear of multis.......


there is a difference, if there is a limit, then maybe, but if not, then they could give all of there points, and there comes the earliest colenal EVAR!
Vote: Mandy
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
User avatar
kid.kaboom
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 3:40 pm
Gender: Male
Location: California

wager your points

Post by kid.kaboom »

How would you like to wager points? A player when creating a game would decide how many points they are going to put on the line. The challenger would then have to match those points to play.
It is kind of like a bet. You could tell a friend or player I bet you 50 points that I could beat you! This would be an interesting change.
Of course there would have to be limits. A maximum amount of points would have to be in effect, mainly for cheaters, but also so you cant lose all your points in a day. Another way to limit this would be by percent%. Either the player that creates the game can not wager more than... 5% or whatever number. The joining player would have to match the points and not exceed the percent; either that or the 1st player would have to play for... 5% of the lower ranked player.
this would just be an option. maybe only in private games
Last edited by kid.kaboom on Mon Jul 16, 2007 3:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
SirSebstar
Posts: 6969
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:51 am
Location: SirSebstar is BACK. Highscore: Colonel Score: 2919 21/03/2011

Post by SirSebstar »

so basicly I could play blitz and have say 50 points from winning from him, OR then he gets them 50 points too?
talk about point inflation..
I like the betting and the pot. try it for a tournement maybe, but defo not for regular games.
User avatar
Genghis Khan CA
Posts: 727
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 11:19 pm

Post by Genghis Khan CA »

This has been suggest 1000 times before and rejected with good reason. I suggest you visit those threads. :roll:
Highest score: 562
Highest place: 16590
Highest rank: Private
chessplaya
Posts: 1875
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 1:46 pm

Post by chessplaya »

this is a funny idea lol
Veni...
Vidi...
Vici...
User avatar
boberz
Posts: 864
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 12:21 pm

Post by boberz »

SirSebstar wrote:I like the betting and the pot. try it for a tournement maybe, but defo not for regular games.


this sounds good
User avatar
erazor
Posts: 70
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:31 am
Gender: Male
Location: Sydney,NSW

Points awards

Post by erazor »

Would it be possible to set up in the start a new game to have an option of how many points the winner will get ( 20, 30, 40, or 50 per each other players)
Every one will know exactly how many points he or she will lose,and that will allow any players regarding of the rank they have to choose witch game suit them the most.
Thanks
Post Reply

Return to “Suggestions”