[Rules] [GO] Option for Players to Set, Stake or Bet Points

by **Mitch.Bina** on Wed May 02, 2007 7:06 pm

aahhh and what was the outcome?

by **hecter** on Wed May 02, 2007 7:08 pm

Well, I imagine it was put on the To Do list…

by **Mitch.Bina** on Wed May 02, 2007 7:09 pm

hhhmm i just read the to-do list and didnt see any ante point system otherwise i wouldnt have posted

by **hecter** on Wed May 02, 2007 7:14 pm

Ya… They really need to update it…

by **Keredrex** on Wed May 02, 2007 8:51 pm

I Agree... It could make a gambling option to the games...

i would love to make a game and play for 20 or even 100 points flat....
it could help you manage your rank progression....

Make a poll

by **AK_iceman** on Wed May 02, 2007 9:07 pm

I like the idea, but 100 points is too much. Maybe 20 points max per game...

by **mibi** on Wed May 02, 2007 9:59 pm

great idea but 20 points max? thats lame. 100 points max. and it should only be for private games other wise there will be too much bitching.

by **Keredrex** on Wed May 02, 2007 10:24 pm

mibi wrote:great idea but 20 points max? thats lame. 100 points max. and it should only be for private games other wise there will be too much bitching.

I think If the Players want to 100 points is a good maximum.... It gives the Generals and Other high ranks a game that could actually hurt there ranks instead of many games

by **AK_iceman** on Wed May 02, 2007 11:16 pm

Keredrex wrote:
mibi wrote:great idea but 20 points max? thats lame. 100 points max. and it should only be for private games other wise there will be too much bitching.

I think If the Players want to 100 points is a good maximum.... It gives the Generals and Other high ranks a game that could actually hurt there ranks instead of many games

Or a game that people could abuse to get high scores.
100 per person in a 6 player game would leave the winner with 500 extra points. Win a couple of those and you're a General. I know we have the Battle Royales, but those aren't common and it doesn't disrupt the balance of points very much.

by **sully800** on Thu May 03, 2007 12:21 am

Also, think of what already existing cheaters would do with such a system. Someone could create a few multis, bet the max and be up thousands of points in no time. Point ante games would completely overturn the current poitn system, and not in a good way. Of course we could eventually catch people who were cheating the system, but would it be fun watching someone shoot up to 5000 points on the scoreboard and then getting busted? The scoreboard would become a joke.

by **lackattack** on Thu May 03, 2007 4:19 am

this isn't happeneing. i think score is more meaningful when it exclusively comes from a consistent formula.

by **Keredrex** on Thu May 03, 2007 10:28 am

AK_iceman wrote:
Keredrex wrote:
mibi wrote:great idea but 20 points max? thats lame. 100 points max. and it should only be for private games other wise there will be too much bitching.

I think If the Players want to 100 points is a good maximum.... It gives the Generals and Other high ranks a game that could actually hurt there ranks instead of many games

Or a game that people could abuse to get high scores.
100 per person in a 6 player game would leave the winner with 500 extra points. Win a couple of those and you're a General. I know we have the Battle Royales, but those aren't common and it doesn't disrupt the balance of points very much.

No I mean 100 Points Flat not per person..... and If all the players want to Then Who Cares its on them .... If people don't want to ante that much ... Don't join the Game....

by **ParadiceCity9** on Thu May 31, 2007 4:45 pm

Mainly for 2 player games. The players can wager the amount of points they are willing the bet on the game.

by **Spritzking** on Thu May 31, 2007 5:35 pm

this has already been rejected

it is to much in for, well you are my friend, we both bet 500 points and i lose against you....

by **ChaoticWraith** on Tue Jun 05, 2007 4:51 pm

<Body>:

* Suggestion Idea: potluck tourneys

* Specifics: more than 6 players can donate 20 points to the pot to enter the tourney or a specified amount and whoever comes out standing through a knockout gets all the points from pot.
* Why it is needed: Gives a bigger incentive to get first place in the tournaments as more points are at stake if you do win.

* Priority** (1-5): 1

other notes: how about adding a game type in which people win after a specified number of rounds based on the number of countries they own and how big their army is. If you want to know a name how about conquerer mode.

by **magneticgoop** on Wed Jun 06, 2007 6:20 pm

interesting pretty good idea maybe even as an option in all game types

by **pancakemix** on Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:39 pm

It has potential for abuse by multis, though. Two multis put in all their points and deadbeat. It could be dangerous.

by **alex_white101** on Wed Jun 06, 2007 10:30 pm

pancakemix wrote:It has potential for abuse by multis, though. Two multis put in all their points and deadbeat. It could be dangerous.

thats exactly the same as a multi starting a 3 player and letting the other 2 deadbeat. u cannot stop and new ideas from fear of multis.......

by **Fircoal** on Wed Jun 06, 2007 11:55 pm

alex_white101 wrote:
pancakemix wrote:It has potential for abuse by multis, though. Two multis put in all their points and deadbeat. It could be dangerous.

thats exactly the same as a multi starting a 3 player and letting the other 2 deadbeat. u cannot stop and new ideas from fear of multis.......

there is a difference, if there is a limit, then maybe, but if not, then they could give all of there points, and there comes the earliest colenal EVAR!

by **kid.kaboom** on Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:54 am

How would you like to wager points? A player when creating a game would decide how many points they are going to put on the line. The challenger would then have to match those points to play.
It is kind of like a bet. You could tell a friend or player I bet you 50 points that I could beat you! This would be an interesting change.
Of course there would have to be limits. A maximum amount of points would have to be in effect, mainly for cheaters, but also so you cant lose all your points in a day. Another way to limit this would be by percent%. Either the player that creates the game can not wager more than... 5% or whatever number. The joining player would have to match the points and not exceed the percent; either that or the 1st player would have to play for... 5% of the lower ranked player.
this would just be an option. maybe only in private games

by **SirSebstar** on Mon Jul 16, 2007 3:45 am

so basicly I could play blitz and have say 50 points from winning from him, OR then he gets them 50 points too?
talk about point inflation..
I like the betting and the pot. try it for a tournement maybe, but defo not for regular games.

by **Genghis Khan CA** on Mon Jul 16, 2007 3:48 am

This has been suggest 1000 times before and rejected with good reason. I suggest you visit those threads. :roll:

by **chessplaya** on Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:02 am

this is a funny idea lol

by **boberz** on Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:57 am

SirSebstar wrote:I like the betting and the pot. try it for a tournement maybe, but defo not for regular games.

this sounds good

by **erazor** on Fri Aug 17, 2007 12:22 am

Would it be possible to set up in the start a new game to have an option of how many points the winner will get ( 20, 30, 40, or 50 per each other players)
Every one will know exactly how many points he or she will lose,and that will allow any players regarding of the rank they have to choose witch game suit them the most.
Thanks