
Moderator: Community Team
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
clapper011 wrote:i had many reports of it offending people.
clapper011 wrote:i had many reports of it offending people.
Tripitaka wrote:So if I find your avatars offensive and degrading to women and enough people agree with me, does that mean you will remove your avatar Clapper?
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
a.sub wrote:I reported it
u have a problem with that?
i happen to be a hindu, and when someone post a goddess in a degraded form* then i will post it as bigotry
not to mention the horrible placement of such a picture**
*the blood and gore was heavily unnecessary, if you google pictures of her they dont have bloody fingers and what not hanging down from her
**if i posted jesus*** on a stripper pole wouldnt that be degrading? i would think so. Same concept
***sorry to pick on him, but he is the most recognized god
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
pimpdave wrote:I'm really curious now. Someone should search through a.sub's posts to see if he ever defended the use of images of Muhammad, The Christ, Santa Claus, Zeus, Thor, or Batman anywhere else...
Cause seriously, if he's being hypocritical about this...
However, I do think that clapper made a really good call by splitting out this thread. Let's all try to keep the Hot + Sexy thread conventional, because if not, those wackjobs from the furry thread might show up and cause mass nausea.
Tripitaka wrote:clapper011 wrote:i had many reports of it offending people.
So if I find your avatars offensive and degrading to women and enough people agree with me, does that mean you will remove your avatar Clapper?
clapper011 wrote:pimpdave wrote:I'm really curious now. Someone should search through a.sub's posts to see if he ever defended the use of images of Muhammad, The Christ, Santa Claus, Zeus, Thor, or Batman anywhere else...
Cause seriously, if he's being hypocritical about this...
However, I do think that clapper made a really good call by splitting out this thread. Let's all try to keep the Hot + Sexy thread conventional, because if not, those wackjobs from the furry thread might show up and cause mass nausea.
this including yourself? as you posted a not so "nice" picture yourself...
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
a.sub wrote:I reported it
u have a problem with that?
i happen to be a hindu, and when someone post a goddess in a degraded form* then i will post it as bigotry
not to mention the horrible placement of such a picture**
*the blood and gore was heavily unnecessary, if you google pictures of her they dont have bloody fingers and what not hanging down from her
**if i posted jesus*** on a stripper pole wouldnt that be degrading? i would think so. Same concept
***sorry to pick on him, but he is the most recognized god
clapper011 wrote:Tripitaka wrote:clapper011 wrote:i had many reports of it offending people.
So if I find your avatars offensive and degrading to women and enough people agree with me, does that mean you will remove your avatar Clapper?
as to this comment... trip you dont find that picture..now that it has been put back..offensive? please!
Wiki wrote:Kali is portrayed mostly in two forms: the popular four-armed form and the ten-armed Mahakali form. In both of her forms, she is described as being black in color but is most often depicted as blue in popular Indian art. Her eyes are described as red with intoxication and in absolute rage, her hair is shown disheveled, small fangs sometimes protrude out of her mouth and her tongue is lolling. She is often shown naked or just wearing a skirt made of human arms and a garland of human heads.
a.sub wrote:I reported it
u have a problem with that?
i happen to be a hindu, and when someone post a goddess in a degraded form* then i will post it as bigotry
not to mention the horrible placement of such a picture**
*the blood and gore was heavily unnecessary, if you google pictures of her they dont have bloody fingers and what not hanging down from her
**if i posted jesus*** on a stripper pole wouldnt that be degrading? i would think so. Same concept
***sorry to pick on him, but he is the most recognized god
Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.
alstergren wrote:a.sub wrote:I reported it
u have a problem with that?
i happen to be a hindu, and when someone post a goddess in a degraded form* then i will post it as bigotry
not to mention the horrible placement of such a picture**
*the blood and gore was heavily unnecessary, if you google pictures of her they dont have bloody fingers and what not hanging down from her
**if i posted jesus*** on a stripper pole wouldnt that be degrading? i would think so. Same concept
***sorry to pick on him, but he is the most recognized god
Suck it up cupcake. Religion is to be kept in private. In public we all have to live with the fact that liberalism and the freedoms stemming from it will cause us, from time to time, to feel offended.
Snorri1234 wrote:clapper011 wrote:Tripitaka wrote:clapper011 wrote:i had many reports of it offending people.
So if I find your avatars offensive and degrading to women and enough people agree with me, does that mean you will remove your avatar Clapper?
as to this comment... trip you dont find that picture..now that it has been put back..offensive? please!
Ofcourse not. It's actually a pretty accurate depiction of Kali.Wiki wrote:Kali is portrayed mostly in two forms: the popular four-armed form and the ten-armed Mahakali form. In both of her forms, she is described as being black in color but is most often depicted as blue in popular Indian art. Her eyes are described as red with intoxication and in absolute rage, her hair is shown disheveled, small fangs sometimes protrude out of her mouth and her tongue is lolling. She is often shown naked or just wearing a skirt made of human arms and a garland of human heads.
Woodruff wrote:All freedoms come with responsibilities and consequences. Someone has the freedom to post that picture. Understanding they have the responsibility on this site to not be intentionally offensive to someone else's religion, there are consequences for them going ahead and doing so. "Suck it up cupcake" is not an acceptable response.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Snorri1234 wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:clapper011 wrote:Tripitaka wrote:clapper011 wrote:i had many reports of it offending people.
So if I find your avatars offensive and degrading to women and enough people agree with me, does that mean you will remove your avatar Clapper?
as to this comment... trip you dont find that picture..now that it has been put back..offensive? please!
Ofcourse not. It's actually a pretty accurate depiction of Kali.Wiki wrote:Kali is portrayed mostly in two forms: the popular four-armed form and the ten-armed Mahakali form. In both of her forms, she is described as being black in color but is most often depicted as blue in popular Indian art. Her eyes are described as red with intoxication and in absolute rage, her hair is shown disheveled, small fangs sometimes protrude out of her mouth and her tongue is lolling. She is often shown naked or just wearing a skirt made of human arms and a garland of human heads.
Seriously clapper (and a.sub) I really want to know whether you actually know anything about Kali or Hindu religion. You can't go and say that something is offensive to people from a certain religion if it is actually an accurate portrayal of that religion.
Seriously, would you ban an image of jesus hanging from the cross as offensive?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users