Woodruff wrote:Night Strike wrote:Symmetry wrote:Aye, and it's this vs the Rev Hill stuff that really comes to mind. Obama stepped up and said that he didn't agree, but he couldn't reject his past. Romney needs to do something to at least be considered a statesman. He seems to want to entirely reject his past. To draw a line.
Romney should step up and accept his mistakes as part of his development. Drawing lines and saying he just changed his mind is his biggest weakness.
Who the heck is Rev Hill? Are you meaning the racist pastor Jeremiah Wright who taught him for 30 years?
And what mistakes has Romney done concerning his taxes? Even if he took deductions that caused him to pay 0% of his income in taxes,
it's all perfectly legal. In fact, any complaining they try to do about Romney's taxes just proves why we need either the Flat Tax or the Fair Tax to make the system fair for everybody, but all we hear them doing is complaining that the rich must pay more.
I don't believe Symmetry is disagreeing with you here. He's simply saying Romney should "man up". I agree with him.
Aye, and NS is right, I meant Rev. Wright.
As for where NS is wrong- I don't assume blind faith in career politicians. I actually care less about the possible problems than the fact that he won't disclose them.
He looks like a coward in the face of a short term hit. TThe Repubs want to throw this guy out in front of China? What's he going to do with Israel, Russia, Germany, Venezuela? For goodness sake, he was mocked by second string Conservative politicians in a friendly visit to the UK.
If he can't man up and turn around an easy hit into a point of strength, prepare for the worst.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein