The1exile wrote:Also, if they're "asked to put in a certain amount of time each week", and it doesn't seem to be sufficient, I hate to sound harsh but maybe it's not asking enough.
Hate to break it to you, but there is a limit on how much time you can ask someone to give of their own volition when it is only volunteer work and not an actual job.
The1exile wrote:Now, I know you say "there are loads of people who are offered it and say 'no thanks'" but then I know many people recommended for the jobs who never got an offer, who might otherwise have kept the forums in the happier state they were some 18 months ago.
How do you know those people were not offered positions because there was a good reason not to? Simply because someone is recommended by their peers does not mean they are a proper fit to do the work.
The interesting dynamic to this discussion is that so many forum regulars blame the moderators for all of the downfall that happened to the forums, yet they refuse to accept that some of their beloved compatriots are just as responsible for the state in which the forum currently lies. It isn't the fault of either side in entirety, but rather a combination of the two, and to be honest I haven't seen much willingness by the forum regulars to let bygones be bygones and try behaving or help make this place a happier place to be. You say that more moderators or more time by each moderator is needed, but what about more forum troublemakers changing their ways, or just forum regulars in general stepping up to the plate and helping calm the crowds when things get dicey?
You don't have to have a fancy colored name to be helpful, and if you think these forums are so damaged, perhaps it is time for you to start doing your part as community members as well, don't you think? I do believe that there are some areas where TeamCC could be strengthened and that there could be some benefit to a bit more consistency by the moderators as a whole, but I don't think they are as damaging as the forum posters seem to think they are.
Perhaps a more rigorous training program for new moderators of whatever level would be appropriate so that consistency could be better achieved and on top of that, new moderators could be given a clear depiction of what the position is really like so they have a chance to back out before going public. Then you won't have moderators who disappear from burnout as often, or who get frustrated and stick to just one forum.