Baron Von PWN wrote:Phatscotty wrote:
How did Zimmerman get a broken nose?
How did he get a cut on the back of his head?
Just wondering if anyone knows.
Heh now your post sort of rhymes. You should make all your posts this way scotty.
and as usual it kind of .....
Just kidding actually. Personally, I try not to form opinions on this stuff in the early days. Been burned by both sides of the media, so while Ive seen quite a bit of reporting on it, pretty much everywhere and its obvious without all the facts you cant know exactly what happened.
However, in answer to your question Phatty... as you suggest the facts are not in, and you are quite right.. Its very possible Zimmerman was walking through his 51% non-white neighborhood as you describe, and assaulted a perfectly innocent kid, who happened to be a minority, which as you showed, would be expected statistically so could be no reason for any suspicion(not that it should be otherwise)... and then that kid defended himself by fighting back, only to be shot.
Maybe he did get suspended for smoking crack, or peeing on a teachers desk...or not doing his art project. Personally I dont give a f*ck if he knew what the pythagorean theorem was or how to spell it, especially since I didn't...at all...but who knows? who cares? However, if he was just walking down the street from his friends house, and a guy got over-zealous and assaulted him for no good reason and got his ass beat as a result and possibly even in self defense, and then shot him because of a situation he himself created, well...Id say maybe assuming Zimmerman is perfectly innocent would be a mistake as well.
Im not saying this happened, but assuming you have all the facts as well, is just as dangerous. Certainly suggesting the kid did anything wrong at all and deserved to be shot is as reckless as suggesting Zimmerman should go on death row.
Would you really defend a guy who shot an innocent person walking down the street, who felt threatened and was possibly assaulted, who defended himself the only way he could with his hands, against a possible criminal that was holding a gun?
Unless it turns out that kid was doing anything remotely illegal, and not just walking down the free sidewalk he was entitled to walk down, an innocent person was confronted by a guy with a gun, got into a fight, and then shot him. Its really difficult to blame this on anyone else, or suggest he had any right to confront an innocent citizen while being armed, and obviously dangerous.
If I catch you in my neighborhood, and I confront you, and walk up to you and confront you, and you feel threatened and defend yourself....do I really get to just shoot you and walk away? I'm not saying this is what happened, and for all I know he had just broken into someones house, but unless that is proven...Zimmerman caused this entire situation, unless the kid simply decided to out of the blue to attack him, and it was just coincidental that Zimmerman was patrolling the streets and never said a word or walked towards the kid.
I know if some strange guy comes up to me and I think he has a gun and Im unarmed, I consider it my right to defend myself physically, and honestly, Im not sure I care if the law even agrees.
I do agree its reckless to suggest without all the facts that Zimmerman was guilty of anything but self defense, but I also think it would be equally reckless to not insure it wasn't essentially the murder of an innocent citizen.