Moderator: Community Team
EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:If we're the sick weirdos,
what does that make you, given you have that disgusting crap on your computer?
Are you also into kiddy porn there mate? Wouldn't surprise me, you sick f*ck. At least you'd be on similar mental and emotional level with those kids though, eh?
sick bastards wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:From the community GuidelinesNudity and sexual material are not allowed.
Any images or textual descriptions of sexual activity or nudity - nipples, areola, genitals, anuses etc - whether intended as artistic, erotic, pornographic or otherwise are not allowed.
This includes content posted here and links to other sites. Posting NSFW - "Not Suitable For Work" - does not make it ok for posting.
If it is ambiguous, we'll ask you to remove it anyway, so "It's a guy's nipple" isn't going to fly. You're just trying to be annoying at that point.
Posting a painting from the 13th century with exposed nipples to claim that we're evil dictators when we ask you to remove it is also just being annoying, and you're probably just being a troll at that point.
ANY images. Any. It is not a loophole.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Lucarilover240 wrote:
And you're the one trying to ban me? Now you're just being an asshole. Not liking something is one thing, but insulting other people for liking it is going too far.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Fircoal wrote:Lucarilover240 wrote:Say, Fircoal, you wouldn't happen to have a copy of Super Smash Bros. Brawl and a Wii with an internet connection, would you?
I do, but I haven't played it in a while XD
do you has MSN?
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
clapper011 wrote:keep it on topic. Frigidus, pimpdave any others that don't agree with this thread..tough luck.... either stop entering into this thread or deal... continue to bring it off topic and you will serve your punishments. Harsh? maybe..but obviously asking you guys nicely to stop derailing this topic isn't working.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:clapper011 wrote:keep it on topic. Frigidus, pimpdave any others that don't agree with this thread..tough luck.... either stop entering into this thread or deal... continue to bring it off topic and you will serve your punishments. Harsh? maybe..but obviously asking you guys nicely to stop derailing this topic isn't working.
clapper, I may be breaking an internet taboo here by explicitly stating it, but how much fun would this thread be if the only things being posted were picture of anthropomorphic animals and comments on how great the latest picture is, regardless of what its artistic merits are? Not very much fun. As it is we have two opposing viewpoints on a topic that no one takes very seriously so there's no real risk of saying anything offensive, this thread is pretty much an embodiment of "much ado about nothing". Would you really take that away from us?
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
MeDeFe wrote:But surely not as seriously as, say, a thread about the intensity cubes being non-random or gun laws.
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
MeDeFe wrote:clapper011 wrote:keep it on topic. Frigidus, pimpdave any others that don't agree with this thread..tough luck.... either stop entering into this thread or deal... continue to bring it off topic and you will serve your punishments. Harsh? maybe..but obviously asking you guys nicely to stop derailing this topic isn't working.
clapper, I may be breaking an internet taboo here by explicitly stating it, but how much fun would this thread be if the only things being posted were picture of anthropomorphic animals and comments on how great the latest picture is, regardless of what its artistic merits are? Not very much fun. As it is we have two opposing viewpoints on a topic that no one takes very seriously so there's no real risk of saying anything offensive, this thread is pretty much an embodiment of "much ado about nothing". Would you really take that away from us?
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
sheepofdumb wrote:MeDeFe wrote:But surely not as seriously as, say, a thread about the intensity cubes being non-random or gun laws.
Oh no, not neatly as serious as one of those threads. Which need to gtfo my forums. Go debate in a place where people are more likely to flame you. That's where you all belong.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
sheepofdumb wrote:Lucario, you attention whoring fur fag, knock it off. This is not what furry is about and if you think it is then you are a lost cause. Furries are a communities of artists (mostly) that enjoy anthropomorphic animals. Of course there are real a-holes here like lucario that enjoy furry p0rn and watching people vomit when they show others. Yes there is a fetish involved which is unfortunate because it has caused the media to really put down furries and spin us as sex starved furverts. When none of it turned out to be true they turned away, not making amends for the harsh accusations they made earlier. Are furries a little strange? Sure, we all have our quirks. Now that you've seen my quirk, albeit the perverted form of it, what's yours?
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Fircoal wrote:sheepofdumb wrote:Lucario, you attention whoring fur fag, knock it off. This is not what furry is about and if you think it is then you are a lost cause. Furries are a communities of artists (mostly) that enjoy anthropomorphic animals. Of course there are real a-holes here like lucario that enjoy furry p0rn and watching people vomit when they show others. Yes there is a fetish involved which is unfortunate because it has caused the media to really put down furries and spin us as sex starved furverts. When none of it turned out to be true they turned away, not making amends for the harsh accusations they made earlier. Are furries a little strange? Sure, we all have our quirks. Now that you've seen my quirk, albeit the perverted form of it, what's yours?
well the fetish isn't really bad, as I do have it to an extent, but the problem is when people just impose it on other people. I have my furry fetish (usually combined with my other fetishes) but I'm not really that militant about it. I mean is there really a problem if you don't make a problem? I enjoy furry art in general and my more fetished/sexual ones. Are either really wrong if I keep them to who enjoy them?
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users