Gay Adoption

[BigBallinStalin]

Furthermore, the Taliban are a clear and present threat to our nation. We must support more funding for our troops!

[john9blue]

you are both half right.

[BigBallinStalin]

Well, let's have the independent weigh in.

What's your position on the gay abolition of Taliban-conceived marriages involving the adoption of three or more gay children?

[2dimes]

Mission accomplished sparky!

[PLAYER57832]

Don't libtards want to kill children by keeping abortion legal? I don't see why they think they should have a say in the actually alive kids' lives.

Only conservitards actually believe that is true.

[john9blue]

Well, let's have the independent weigh in.

What's your position on the gay abolition of Taliban-conceived marriages involving the adoption of three or more gay children?

nowhere in the constitution does it say that gay people CAN'T do that... so basically i'm all for it.

[BigBallinStalin]

Well, let's have the independent weigh in.

What's your position on the gay abolition of Taliban-conceived marriages involving the adoption of three or more gay children?

nowhere in the constitution does it say that gay people CAN'T do that... so basically i'm all for it.

OH! OH! But what about Amendment X, which states:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

What now, john? What now?



(to be fair, I think there's something in the constitution about marriage and how the federal government is involved with it, but I dunno lol).

[john9blue]

Well, let's have the independent weigh in.

What's your position on the gay abolition of Taliban-conceived marriages involving the adoption of three or more gay children?

nowhere in the constitution does it say that gay people CAN'T do that... so basically i'm all for it.

OH! OH! But what about Amendment X, which states:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

What now, john? What now?

it depends on how gay the state is.

a strongly heterosexual state like colorado has no right to abolish taliban marriages.

new hampshire, on the other hand...

[Army of GOD]

Vermont and New Hampshire are definitely the gayest states. They're 69ing for god's sakes.

[john9blue]

Vermont and New Hampshire are definitely the gayest states. They're 69ing for god's sakes.

yeah, but the reason i said new hampshire is because vermont is on top and new hampshire is the bottom. therefore NH is gayer because it's vermont's bitch

[saxitoxin]

but Vermont looks like it's enjoying it more



(blacked out the naughty parts so I don't get a ban)

[BigBallinStalin]

To be serious, in Phatscotty's defense, which so far has been embarrassing to me, the issue of gay marriage and gay adoption should be delegated to the States--according to the Constitution. If anyone would like to argue against my Appeal to the Constitution argument (lightly explained here), then they're free to use the constitution against me, or maybe even use the Declaration of Independence.

If not, they can present some other argument based on whatever grounds.

ITT, I'll strive to be Constitutionalist.

[patrickaa317]

To be serious, in Phatscotty's defense, which so far has been embarrassing to me, the issue of gay marriage and gay adoption should be delegated to the States--according to the Constitution. If anyone would like to argue against my Appeal to the Constitution argument (lightly explained here), then they're free to use the constitution against me, or maybe even use the Declaration of Independence.

If not, they can present some other argument based on whatever grounds.

ITT, I'll strive to be Constitutionalist.

Which is also why I have mentioned that the best thing that could happen for gay marriage would be the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act that was signed in under Clinton; and in turn force the federal government to recognize marriage if the applicable state recognizes said marriage as such.

[Lootifer]

ITT, I'll strive to be Constitutionalist.

Darfaq? You used to be cool...

[Phatscotty]

To be serious, in Phatscotty's defense, which so far has been embarrassing to me, the issue of gay marriage and gay adoption should be delegated to the States--according to the Constitution. If anyone would like to argue against my Appeal to the Constitution argument (lightly explained here), then they're free to use the constitution against me, or maybe even use the Declaration of Independence.

If not, they can present some other argument based on whatever grounds.

ITT, I'll strive to be Constitutionalist.

yeah, states rights

[BigBallinStalin]

ITT, I'll strive to be Constitutionalist.

Darfaq? You used to be cool...

Bring it, Lootaboy.

**It's pronounced "Darfur," not "Darfaq," you simpleton.

[Juan_Bottom]

[Woodruff]

I think the people in charge of giving away the child should have some say in the decision

I agree, as long as they're not being bigoted.

, and I think the child should have a say too.

I can agree with that.

Seems fair

As long as they're not being bigoted.

Why would anyone be bigoted against the people giving away the child and the child? Do they have ideas that the adopting parents are bigoted against?

Do you actually not understand the sentence that you wrote?

[PLAYER57832]

Oh, but it must... after all Nightstrike is ALL about the constitution!

[Juan_Bottom]

If it's not in the Constitution, then we get to hear STATES RIGHTS!!!!!

[patrickaa317]

I don't believe the constitution defines any sins actually. Perhaps Woodruff the constitutional teacher can chime in and help you understand what is in there.

[Phatscotty]

Poll has ended

[Army of GOD]

can cheeseburgers adopt children?

[PLAYER57832]

I don't believe the constitution defines any sins actually. Perhaps Woodruff the constitutional teacher can chime in and help you understand what is in there.

I believe you can check under "sarcasm" in your dictionary for the real explanation.

[Woodruff]

I don't believe the constitution defines any sins actually. Perhaps Woodruff the constitutional teacher can chime in and help you understand what is in there.

I suspect that is precisely the point the meme is trying to make...