Conquer Club

Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform USA!

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby Juan_Bottom on Sun Aug 05, 2012 12:49 pm

saxitoxin wrote:
Juan_Bottom wrote:Barney Frank was never caught paying a hooker $20,000 a month to live with him.

Years earlier, Frank had paid Gobie for sex; he eventually hired him as his assistant. Gobie was later accused of running a sex business out of Frank's home. Frank also used his House privileges to waive Gobie's parking tickets.

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/200 ... rostitutes

That's not the same thing. He didn't pay him $20,000 a month to have sex with him as a sex toy.
When he paid Gobie to have sex with him (1 time only), that was at a time when it was not ok to be an "out" homosexual in America. "Gay Bashing" had become a social phenomenon, and there had never been an open homosexual in Congress, the White House, or the Supreme Court. And it's clear that, because he later hired Gobie to work as an assistant, that he didn't originally hire Gobie just for sex. There had to be a companionship aspect to it. He may have also hired him later because of a feeling of guilt.


saxitoxin wrote: The House ethics committee voted today to recommend that Representative Barney Frank receive a formal reprimand from the House for his relationship with a male prostitute, Congressional officials said. The committee's unanimous vote in a closed meeting ended months of deadlock among its 12 members over how harsh a punishment was appropriate.

http://www.nytimes.com/1990/07/20/us/fo ... panel.html

They found him innocent of the charges you've you've lobbed against him again. The House Ethics Committee ran a witch hunt to investigate (D) Frank's gayness and relationship with a Gay Prostitute. They found that all claims against him were groundless.
What they did find was that Barney Frank had "misstatements of fact in a memorandum" for Gobie's criminal record and that he used his office to fix 33 of Gobie's parking tickets.

saxitoxin wrote:These are the current, mid-cycle, 2012 figures and they're still incredibly high for a Congressman who has run unopposed 4 of the last 7 elections (in 2002 he won with 99% of the vote and spent $0, but raised $1.8 million). Pre-scandal numbers were astonishing. He was the second highest paid member of Congress by the financial services industries after Joe "Mastercard" Biden.

http://www.opensecrets.org

The Center for Responsive Politics estimate Banrey Frank's personal worth between $619,024 and $1,510,000. His default yearly salary of $174,000 per year means that he could easily achieve this net without being a sell-out. In fact, were he a sell out, I'd expect his personal wealth to be much greater.


Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby BigBallinStalin on Sun Aug 05, 2012 3:48 pm

At least sax posted sources. Phat_Bottom, do what you do best and post some more pics.

How about praising Barnie Frank for being a crony capitalist because he's Democrat and he supports red herring issues like gay marriage? Yeah, that'll show 'em!
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby Symmetry on Sun Aug 05, 2012 3:50 pm

BigBallinStalin wrote:At least sax posted sources. Phat_Bottom, do what you do best and post some more pics.

How about praising Barnie Frank for being a crony capitalist because he's Democrat and he supports red herring issues like gay marriage? Yeah, that'll show 'em!


Pretty sure he posted a source in the post directly above yours.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby Juan_Bottom on Sun Aug 05, 2012 4:07 pm

I'm the guy who's always posting links. Above I posted names and numbers so anyone could fact-check. Notice BBS didn't take issue with any facts I posted, because he couldn't. He just attacked me for not posting enough links, which isn't the same thing. If I had been debating with him I may have coddled him more than Saxi.

Arguing that Barney Frank is supporting a "Red Herring" issue is beyond ridiculous; it's dishonest and shows that BBS has no idea what the issues are. He's just here to attack me because of the fight we had over his racist Holocaust jokes. And probably also because I'm not afraid to tell people that he's not an economist. Barney Frank was the House's first "out" & married Homosexual. He obviously cares about the issue. So, duh!
Furthermore, I just friggin' pointed out that he hasn't accumulated much wealth for his long tenure. His lack of financial resources is evidence that he's not a crony capitalist. Did he even read my rebuttal or just scan it for a chance to attack me?
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby BigBallinStalin on Sun Aug 05, 2012 4:11 pm

Symmetry wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:At least sax posted sources. Phat_Bottom, do what you do best and post some more pics.

How about praising Barnie Frank for being a crony capitalist because he's Democrat and he supports red herring issues like gay marriage? Yeah, that'll show 'em!


Pretty sure he posted a source in the post directly above yours.


And his first two? EHHHHHHH.... I dunno, Sym. Not seeing much there, but this is Phat_Bottom. Whenever he says something, you'll drop your standards because you already agree with him. Whenever PhatScotty says something, you'll raise your standards because you already disagree with him.


You might be coming down with a serious case of Phatism. Please report to the cyber epidemic thread
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby BigBallinStalin on Sun Aug 05, 2012 4:13 pm

Juan_Bottom wrote:I'm the guy who's always posting links. Above I posted names and numbers so anyone could fact-check. Notice BBS didn't take issue with any facts I posted, because he couldn't. He just attacked me for not posting enough links, which isn't the same thing. If I had been debating with him I may have coddled him more than Saxi.

Arguing that Barney Frank is supporting a "Red Herring" issue is beyond ridiculous; it's dishonest and shows that BBS has no idea what the issues are. He's just here to attack me because of the fight we had over his racist Holocaust jokes. And probably also because I'm not afraid to tell people that he's not an economist. Barney Frank was the House's first "out" & married Homosexual. He obviously cares about the issue. So, duh!
Furthermore, I just friggin' pointed out that he hasn't accumulated much wealth for his long tenure. His lack of financial resources is evidence that he's not a crony capitalist. Did he even read my rebuttal or just scan it for a chance to attack me?


Sorry, Phat_Bottom. I could only get through the first sentence, and then I skimmed the rest. You have a history of making illogical arguments, so there's no point in taking you seriously.

I wish you luck with your recent affliction of Phatism. God be with you.
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby Symmetry on Sun Aug 05, 2012 4:16 pm

BigBallinStalin wrote:Sorry, Phat_Bottom. I could only get through the first sentence, and then I skimmed the rest. You have a history of making illogical arguments, so there's no point in taking you seriously.

I wish you luck with your recent affliction of Phatism. God be with you.


This ain't exactly the first time you've accused a poster of not posting sources directly after they posted sources, BBS.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby Juan_Bottom on Sun Aug 05, 2012 4:20 pm

Image

While I can't see what he's posting, without some suspension of disbelief, lemme take a guess at what he posted.

He didn't read what I wrote, he didn't respond to what I wrote, he called me Phattscotty, and then he attacked Symm for pointing out the link.

??????
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby BigBallinStalin on Sun Aug 05, 2012 4:34 pm

Symmetry wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Sorry, Phat_Bottom. I could only get through the first sentence, and then I skimmed the rest. You have a history of making illogical arguments, so there's no point in taking you seriously.

I wish you luck with your recent affliction of Phatism. God be with you.


This ain't exactly the first time you've accused a poster of not posting sources directly after they posted sources, BBS.


Okay, Sym. You're most likely angry about something in the RL, and now you're lashing out in the fora. It isn't healthy, and there's no good reason for me to respond to you for awhile.
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby Symmetry on Sun Aug 05, 2012 4:36 pm

BigBallinStalin wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Sorry, Phat_Bottom. I could only get through the first sentence, and then I skimmed the rest. You have a history of making illogical arguments, so there's no point in taking you seriously.

I wish you luck with your recent affliction of Phatism. God be with you.


This ain't exactly the first time you've accused a poster of not posting sources directly after they posted sources, BBS.


Okay, Sym. You're most likely angry about something in the RL, and now you're lashing out in the fora. It isn't healthy, and there's no good reason for me to respond to you for awhile.


Huh, that was kind of unexpected as a response. What do you mean?

Are you really so angry at being wrong on this? JB had a source in the post directly above your post accusing him of not posting sources. You replied to it.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby saxitoxin on Sun Aug 05, 2012 6:32 pm

Juan_Bottom wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:
Juan_Bottom wrote:Barney Frank was never caught paying a hooker $20,000 a month to live with him.

Years earlier, Frank had paid Gobie for sex; he eventually hired him as his assistant. Gobie was later accused of running a sex business out of Frank's home. Frank also used his House privileges to waive Gobie's parking tickets.

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/200 ... rostitutes

That's not the same thing. He didn't pay him $20,000 a month to have sex with him as a sex toy.


Oh okay! Nevermind then!


Juan_Bottom wrote:
saxitoxin wrote: The House ethics committee voted today to recommend that Representative Barney Frank receive a formal reprimand from the House for his relationship with a male prostitute, Congressional officials said. The committee's unanimous vote in a closed meeting ended months of deadlock among its 12 members over how harsh a punishment was appropriate.

http://www.nytimes.com/1990/07/20/us/fo ... panel.html

They found him innocent of the charges you've you've lobbed against him again. The House Ethics Committee ran a witch hunt to investigate


Since the House Ethics Committee, at the time, consisted of 6 Democrats and 3 Republicans, is it safe to say we shouldn't trust Democrats and Democrats tend to organize witchhunts to embarrass the ethically pure Bawney Fwank? Or can we try to desperately rationalize this - like everything else - with some grand, intricate conspiracy theory so that the heroes we so desperately, frantically, want to believe in stay on their pedestals and we can process the world in easy shades of black/white, red/blue instead of facing ugly truths?

In the recent words of the great John Zerzan, the "Obama/Romney supporters - the world of the thinking blobs."

Juan_Bottom wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:These are the current, mid-cycle, 2012 figures and they're still incredibly high for a Congressman who has run unopposed 4 of the last 7 elections (in 2002 he won with 99% of the vote and spent $0, but raised $1.8 million). Pre-scandal numbers were astonishing. He was the second highest paid member of Congress by the financial services industries after Joe "Mastercard" Biden.

http://www.opensecrets.org


The Center for Responsive Politics estimate Banrey Frank's personal worth between $619,024 and $1,510,000. His default yearly salary of $174,000 per year means that he could easily achieve this net without being a sell-out. In fact, were he a sell out, I'd expect his personal wealth to be much greater.


I'm sorry, but these are just a bunch of words that aren't organized in such a way that they actually communicate a thought.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13413
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby saxitoxin on Sun Aug 05, 2012 6:48 pm

Meet Michael R. Taylor

Curriculum Vitae

Image

1976-1980 : Staff Attorney, FDA (appointed by presidency of Jimmy Carter)
1980-1988 : Corporate Attorney, Monsanto Inc.
1988-1992 : Deputy Commissioner, FDA (appointed by presidency of George H.W. Bush)
1992-2000 : U.S. Food Safety Administrator (appointed by presidency of William J. Clinton)
2000-2008 : Senior Vice-President for Policy, Monsanto Inc.
2008-Present : Deputy Commissioner, FDA (appointed by presidency of Barack H. Obama)

The Bush-Obama FDA has approved, last year, the unrestricted planting of Monsanto alfalfa and gone on to require farmers to pay Monsanto royalties if Monsanto seeds blow on the wind currents and land in their fields. Further rulings by the end of this year on Monsanto's Roundup Ready crops and Terminator seeds will effectively place the entire world's food supply under the control of Monsanto.

No people in any country in the world can do anything about that except for people in one country, but they're too busy debating about who should be allowed to participate in various parties like wedding receptions and Flag Day barbecues, or what color streamers to use or the kind of cake toppers that are best.

brainwashed, corpulent Americans ...
Image
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13413
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby BigBallinStalin on Sun Aug 05, 2012 7:22 pm

Yeah, but without regulatory bodies like the FDA, there would be chaos, and no market solution would ever emerge like competing certification agencies!

Saxi, we have to support crony capitalism because without the power of government, which corporations use to become powerful, the corporations would control us!
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby saxitoxin on Sun Aug 05, 2012 7:33 pm

BigBallinStalin wrote:Yeah, but without regulatory bodies like the FDA, there would be chaos, and no market solution would ever emerge like competing certification agencies!

Saxi, we have to support crony capitalism because without the power of government, which corporations use to become powerful, the corporations would control us!


Image
SAXI SAYS -

HEY YOU GUYS - LOOK AT THIS! The brain matter of a 2 year old child has created a 3-foot splatter mark after a Hellfire missile salvo Obama ordered. Isn't it amazing how much brains can fit inside a small package?

Image

--------------------------------------------

Image
BAWNEY FWANK SAYS -

Let me tell you all about how FAWBUOUS Ellen's wedding to Portia de Rossi was - I was even featured in the highlights on Access Hollywood! Diamond rings! Pretty dresses! Beautiful people! Scrumptious apps! Fab cocktails! Free gift bags sponsored by Victoria's Secret and Taco Bell! Look at me, look at me! Look over here!

Image





So at the end of Rome ... the rulers entertained the peasants with bread and circuses as the Vandals encircled the city walls ...

Image
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13413
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby Juan_Bottom on Sun Aug 05, 2012 9:13 pm

People can separate the issue Saxi.

saxitoxin wrote:Since the House Ethics Committee, at the time, consisted of 6 Democrats and 3 Republicans, is it safe to say we shouldn't trust Democrats and Democrats tend to organize witchhunts to embarrass the ethically pure Bawney Fwank? Or can we try to desperately rationalize this - like everything else - with some grand, intricate conspiracy theory so that the heroes we so desperately, frantically, want to believe in stay on their pedestals and we can process the world in easy shades of black/white, red/blue instead of facing ugly truths?

In the recent words of the great John Zerzan, the "Obama/Romney supporters - the world of the thinking blobs."


Your issue is that you're an anarchist who hates all government. While Frank has been somewhat of a big government advocate, with things like anti-abortion laws, a strong Civil Rights voting record, Co-Sponsoring the Innocence Protection Act of 2001, States' Rights to Medical Marijuana Act (H.R. 2592), Personal Use of Marijuana by Responsible Adults Act of 2008 (HR 5843), "Removing Impediments to Students Education" (RISE) ((H.R.5157) 08-HR5157), Community AIDS and Hepatitis Prevention Act (HR 179 2009-H179), "Federal Agency Protection of Privacy Act" (H.R.4561), Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 2009 (H.R.1866 2009-H1866), "Anti-Spamming Act" (01-HR718), "Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments" (H.R.3392), "National Forest Protection and Restoration Act" (H.R.1494), "Great Cats and Rare Canids Act" (H.R.1464), H.R. 5244 - the Credit Cardholders' Bill of Rights , "Animal Fighting Prohibition Enforcement Act" (S.261/H.R.137), "Partnership Benefits and Obligations Act" (S.2521/H.R.4838), "Federal Law Enforcement Dependents Assistance Act" (H.R.4111. Became Public Law No: 104-238), "the MX Missile Stand-Down Act" (01-HR2718), the Landmine Elimination and Victim Assistance Act (01-HR948), "Rail Security Act" (S.1379/H.R.153) (05-S1379), "Veterans Suicide Study Act" ( (S.2899/H.R.4204) 08-S2899), H.R. 2046 - the Internet Gambling Regulation and Enforcement Act (restored online gambling rights), H.R. 5767 - the Payment Systems Protection Act, and strongly supporting the Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act (H.R. 3915) and the Federal Housing Reform Act (H.R. 1427), he's still also a good friend of Ron Paul.
Oh, and he also wants to reduce our military spending. I've seen his requests listed between 20 - 35%.

In 2009 Frank had a 100% rating from NARAL Pro-Choice America indicating a pro-choice voting record.
In 2002 he was scored at 93% by the American Civil Liberties Union on civil rights issues indicating a pro-civil rights voting record.
In April 2009 Frank was named in the LGBT magazine Out's "Annual Power 50 List", landing at the top spot.
In 2003 he was rated "A" by Vote Hemp, indicating a pro-hemp voting record.
In 2003 he was rated 95% by the League of Conservation Voters indicating pro-environment votes.
In 2000 Frank was rated at 89% by Citizens United for Rehabilitation of Errants indicating pro-rehabilitation crime votes.
The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People scored him at 100% in 2006 indicating a pro-affirmative-action stance


AND he opposed amnesty for those involved in the NSA warrantless surveillance controversy.

So I can see why an Anarchist would hate him. I however, do not.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby Phatscotty on Sun Aug 05, 2012 9:17 pm

BigBallinStalin wrote:
Juan_Bottom wrote:I'm the guy who's always posting links. Above I posted names and numbers so anyone could fact-check. Notice BBS didn't take issue with any facts I posted, because he couldn't. He just attacked me for not posting enough links, which isn't the same thing. If I had been debating with him I may have coddled him more than Saxi.

Arguing that Barney Frank is supporting a "Red Herring" issue is beyond ridiculous; it's dishonest and shows that BBS has no idea what the issues are. He's just here to attack me because of the fight we had over his racist Holocaust jokes. And probably also because I'm not afraid to tell people that he's not an economist. Barney Frank was the House's first "out" & married Homosexual. He obviously cares about the issue. So, duh!
Furthermore, I just friggin' pointed out that he hasn't accumulated much wealth for his long tenure. His lack of financial resources is evidence that he's not a crony capitalist. Did he even read my rebuttal or just scan it for a chance to attack me?


Sorry, Phat_Bottom. I could only get through the first sentence, and then I skimmed the rest. You have a history of making illogical arguments, so there's no point in taking you seriously.

I wish you luck with your recent affliction of Phatism. God be with you.


u r such a dik
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby Army of GOD on Sun Aug 05, 2012 9:27 pm

BigBallinStalin wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:At least sax posted sources. Phat_Bottom, do what you do best and post some more pics.

How about praising Barnie Frank for being a crony capitalist because he's Democrat and he supports red herring issues like gay marriage? Yeah, that'll show 'em!


Pretty sure he posted a source in the post directly above yours.


And his first two? EHHHHHHH.... I dunno, Sym. Not seeing much there, but this is Phat_Bottom. Whenever he says something, you'll drop your standards because you already agree with him. Whenever PhatScotty says something, you'll raise your standards because you already disagree with him.


You might be coming down with a serious case of Phatism. Please report to the cyber epidemic thread


I said the same thing in the Chick-fil-a thread
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7191
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby saxitoxin on Sun Aug 05, 2012 9:41 pm

Juan_Bottom wrote:While Frank has been somewhat of a big government advocate, with things like...


Voted Yes on Killing the People of Iraq
Voted Yes on Killing the People of Afghanistan
Voted Yes on Killing the People of Libya
Voted Yes on Killing the People of Serbia

These kids parents are cool with his brains getting splattered across the rocks (LOL - theirs are probably that pile of brown goo a few feet over! :lol: ) if it means Ellen and Portia have a glamorous wedding and Bawney gets entertained by all manner of muscular young men who have been paid to be mounted by hundreds of pounds of fat at his luxury Boston townhome.

Image

Keep voting for whomever gives you the most in a dwindling pile of treats and goodies; your pleasure and comfort is more important than brown people keeping their heads or limbs attached to their bodies. And remember, after you pull the lever for Obama, close your eyes, snuggle up in your blanket, and repeat as frantically as possible, like the Germans did before you ... there's no day of reckoning coming, I'll never be held personally responsible ...

Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13413
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby Juan_Bottom on Mon Aug 06, 2012 1:03 am

saxitoxin wrote:Voted Yes on Killing the People of Iraq
Voted Yes on Killing the People of Afghanistan
Voted Yes on Killing the People of Libya
Voted Yes on Killing the People of Serbia


saxitoxin wrote:like the Germans did before you ... there's no day of reckoning coming, I'll never be held personally responsible ...


And then you moved here from Germany. Is it your families destiny to have it's members die as citizens of every tyrannical rogue government?
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby john9blue on Mon Aug 06, 2012 1:33 am

Juan_Bottom wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:Voted Yes on Killing the People of Iraq
Voted Yes on Killing the People of Afghanistan
Voted Yes on Killing the People of Libya
Voted Yes on Killing the People of Serbia


saxitoxin wrote:like the Germans did before you ... there's no day of reckoning coming, I'll never be held personally responsible ...


And then you moved here from Germany. Is it your families destiny to have it's members die as citizens of every tyrannical rogue government?


ladies and gentlemen, the average liberal debater.

and people wonder why i criticize you fuckers instead of the conservatives.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Captain john9blue
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby Juan_Bottom on Mon Aug 06, 2012 1:40 am

Did you just call me a fucker?

See above. I responded to each of Saxi's posts with facts that support my position. He responded to those facts with things I was ready for; So when he ran out of arguments he resorted to calling me a sheep.

WHAT THE f*ck DO YOU WANT ME TO SAY TO SOMEONE WHO'S NOT ARGUING THE FACTS ANYMORE? YOU WANT ME TO PRETEND LIKE THEY'RE BEING REASONABLE AND PRETEND LIKE THEY HAVE A LEGITIMATE POSITION OR GRUDGE? YOU WANT ME TO PRETEND LIKE YOU'RE BEING REASONABLE TOO?

You didn't even read the shit above so shut up. You just think that because it's Saxi I'm automatically the bad guy. Bugger off.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby john9blue on Mon Aug 06, 2012 2:00 am

your posts in this thread are either defenses of barney frank or random personal attacks on people

i stand by what i said earlier in the thread: gay marriage isn't even close to being the most important issue in politics. you act like democrats are the saviors of america just because of their position on this one largely irrelevant issue. i support gay marriage, but you don't see me defending democrats, because i realize what actually matters. saxi has been posting about what actually matters despite the fact that he's been disrespectful and trollish as usual. and you seem scared to actually admit that your heroes aren't heroes.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Captain john9blue
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby Haggis_McMutton on Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:34 am

john9blue wrote:ladies and gentlemen, the average liberal debater.

and people wonder why i criticize you fuckers instead of the conservatives.


A are bad therefore B are good.

Congratulations, I see you have graduated the scotty school of logic magna cum laude.
Highest score: 3063; Highest position: 67;
Winner of {World War II tournament, -team 2010 Skilled Diversity, [FuN||Chewy]-[XII] USA};
8-3-7
User avatar
Major Haggis_McMutton
 
Posts: 403
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:32 am

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby Juan_Bottom on Mon Aug 06, 2012 2:04 pm

john9blue wrote:your posts in this thread are either defenses of barney frank or random personal attacks on people


This was a celebratory thread about the Democrats standing up for equal rights, or if you'd rather; the Democrats standing up for the Constitution. Unfortunately people who know nothing about politics, including you, have chosen to hijack it and us it to attack Barney Frank, simply because he was chosen to make the announcement. He was chosen because he's gay and married, and because he's been fighting for equality for most of his career.

In 2002 he was scored at 93% by the American Civil Liberties Union on civil rights issues indicating a pro-civil rights voting record.


john9blue wrote:i stand by what i said earlier in the thread: gay marriage isn't even close to being the most important issue in politics. you act like democrats are the saviors of America just because of their position on this one largely irrelevant issue. i support gay marriage, but you don't see me defending democrats, because i realize what actually matters.


Gay rights is no more "irrelevant" than black rights or female rights. How we treat our neighbors defines us as a nation. How we choose to apply our own beloved Declaration and Bill of Rights is everlasting and important. This is not an irrelevant issue.

john9blue wrote:saxi has been posting about what actually matters despite the fact that he's been disrespectful and trollish as usual. and you seem scared to actually admit that your heroes aren't heroes.

Saxi s an Anarchist, that's why he's attacking the Dems/Barney Frank. Barney Frank is a hero.
I was just gonna let it go, but the fact that you don't even bother to fact check before attacking me and calling me the FUCKER is obnoxious and annoying. Realize JBII that Barney Frank has been fighting all the same shit that Saxi was complaining about. Obviously if I'm going to go toe-to-toe with Saxi then I have already done my homework. You should have been able to see that for yourself the way I was able to easily answer Saxi's earlier checks. I still believe that you say Saxi's name so assumed he was right and that was the side that you had to be on.
BARNEY FRANK HAS CONSISTENTLY VOTED FOR CIVIL RIGHTS, TO DECREASE MILITARY SPENDING, AGAINST THE WAR IN IRAQ, AND LIMITED INTERVENTION IN AFGHANISTAN. He's good friends with Ron Paul.
http://usliberals.about.com/od/liberall ... ayVote.htm



Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Same-Sex Marriage Unanimously Included In DNC Platform U

Postby Woodruff on Mon Aug 06, 2012 2:11 pm

john9blue wrote:your posts in this thread are either defenses of barney frank or random personal attacks on people

i stand by what i said earlier in the thread: gay marriage isn't even close to being the most important issue in politics. you act like democrats are the saviors of america just because of their position on this one largely irrelevant issue. i support gay marriage, but you don't see me defending democrats, because i realize what actually matters. saxi has been posting about what actually matters despite the fact that he's been disrespectful and trollish as usual. and you seem scared to actually admit that your heroes aren't heroes.


Saxi has been posting about things that are not relevant to this thread. Most places, that would be considered trolling.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users