Moderator: Community Team
yang guize wrote:they are trying to impose their ideological hegemony on you, phatscotty.
they will continue to try and force their views on you, but as long as you stand up to their bullying their efforts will eventually expose them to their peers as the narrow-minded, intolerant and arrogant bullies that they are.
men like gadaffi tried to force everyone to think like him, and men like him fell.
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Neoteny wrote:Phatguize.
This epidemic is worse than I thought. The willingness to distort reality is frightening. I must have access to the recent Ebola strain to protect myself from this madness.
BigBallinStalin wrote:Neoteny wrote:Phatguize.
This epidemic is worse than I thought. The willingness to distort reality is frightening. I must have access to the recent Ebola strain to protect myself from this madness.
My God, Neoteny's right. Another one has fell victim to the disease.
This is SERIOUS, people!
yang guize wrote:he doesn't really have free speech if you shout at him for opinions that you don't like
yang guize wrote:international human rights 19: 'everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference'. that is free speech. not 'everyone can hold opinions and then be shouted at for them'
Phatscotty wrote:Parade of Hate
Do you see anyone at Chik-Fil-A saying anything remotely close to this? It's time to call a spade a spade
[img]http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Screen-Shot-2012-08-01-at-3.50.18-PM.png[img]
[img]http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Screen-Shot-2012-08-01-at-3.48.11-PM.png[img]
[img]http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Screen-Shot-2012-08-01-at-3.47.16-PM.png[img]
[img]http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Screen-Shot-2012-08-01-at-3.46.43-PM.png[img]
[img]http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Screen-Shot-2012-08-01-at-3.45.56-PM.png[img]
[img]http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Screen-Shot-2012-08-01-at-3.44.00-PM.png[img]
[img]http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Screen-Shot-2012-08-01-at-4.02.21-PM.png[img]
[img]http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Screen-Shot-2012-08-01-at-4.27.37-PM.png[img]
[img]http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Screen-Shot-2012-08-01-at-4.50.36-PM.png[img]
Most of Mitt Romney's newest Twitter followers are fake, according to an investigation of bogus social media accounts.
A pay-for-follower service most likely drove the presumptive Republican nominee's recent and dramatic spike in online followers, concluded Baccardua Labs, a digital security company.
The widely reported surge in tens of thousands of new followers for @mittromney from 21 July ā which provoked commentary and suspicion ā appeared to have been purchased from a dealer, it said: "We believe most of these recent followers of Romney are not from a general Twitter population but most likely from a paid Twitter follower service."
The analysis, part of a wider investigation into what the report called the underground Twitter economy, found telltale signals that about a quarter of the new followers were less than three weeks old and had not tweeted. Some 80% were less than three-months-old
GBU56 wrote:There's no doubt that GOD! himself has intervened and punished these bigots.
yang guize wrote:it is funny that in the 'land of the free' there is so much intolerance of phatscotty's views.
john9blue wrote:yang guize wrote:i actually think he argues consistently. he feels that people are free to live however they choose, whether they want to hate gays or marry other men, and he feels that majority rule (exercised through voting) should be the ultimate decider of society's values. i have not seen him sway from this.
sure thing, mr. moderate!
stop your trolling this instant!
why haven't the mods banned this guy yet???
![]()
Phatscotty wrote:Neo is a big boy, mr. Stalin. If he doesn't like the way I communicate, especially in a response to his consistent slander, then why does he come to my discussions? Does he really have to click on my threads? Have you ever thought about this?
Phatscotty wrote:pathetic. "hey everybody, gang up on Phatscotty!". weak
Woodruff wrote:yang guize wrote:it is funny that in the 'land of the free' there is so much intolerance of phatscotty's views.
It's not his views, actually. There are others here who hold essentially the same views, or even possibly more conservative than his, who don't get the grief he does because they are consistent and not hypocritical...unlike him. He gets the grief because he is inconsistent and hypocritical.
Phatscotty wrote:Woodruff wrote:yang guize wrote:it is funny that in the 'land of the free' there is so much intolerance of phatscotty's views.
It's not his views, actually. There are others here who hold essentially the same views, or even possibly more conservative than his, who don't get the grief he does because they are consistent and not hypocritical...unlike him. He gets the grief because he is inconsistent and hypocritical.
and all you can do is smear.
Phatscotty wrote:Don't get me wrong, I take your smear as the highest form of flattery. It means you know I am right, and you can't find a way to squirm out of it or justify your position (RARELY offered) or argue to the contrary, so I must be smeared, because it's all you got.
Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Woodruff wrote:yang guize wrote:it is funny that in the 'land of the free' there is so much intolerance of phatscotty's views.
It's not his views, actually. There are others here who hold essentially the same views, or even possibly more conservative than his, who don't get the grief he does because they are consistent and not hypocritical...unlike him. He gets the grief because he is inconsistent and hypocritical.
and all you can do is smear.
No it isn't. There was a time, and it still occurs occasionally to this day, when I have attempted to honestly discuss issues with you. In fact, I have tried very hard to do so. But you've never been able to get past your own buffoonery of hypocricy, inconsistency and flat-out ignoring opposing views to allow it to happen.Phatscotty wrote:Don't get me wrong, I take your smear as the highest form of flattery. It means you know I am right, and you can't find a way to squirm out of it or justify your position (RARELY offered) or argue to the contrary, so I must be smeared, because it's all you got.
More accurately, it's all you're worth.
Phatscotty wrote:Parade of Hate
Do you see anyone at Chik-Fil-A saying anything remotely close to this? Who are the real haters? It's time to call a spade a spade
[img]http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Screen-Shot-2012-08-01-at-3.50.18-PM.png[img]
[img]http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Screen-Shot-2012-08-01-at-3.48.11-PM.png[img]
[img]http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Screen-Shot-2012-08-01-at-3.47.16-PM.png[img]
[img]http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Screen-Shot-2012-08-01-at-3.46.43-PM.png[img]
[img]http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Screen-Shot-2012-08-01-at-3.45.56-PM.png[img]
[img]http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Screen-Shot-2012-08-01-at-3.44.00-PM.png[img]
[img]http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Screen-Shot-2012-08-01-at-4.02.21-PM.png[img]
[img]http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Screen-Shot-2012-08-01-at-4.27.37-PM.png[img]
[img]http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Screen-Shot-2012-08-01-at-4.50.36-PM.png[img]
Phatscotty wrote:Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Woodruff wrote:yang guize wrote:it is funny that in the 'land of the free' there is so much intolerance of phatscotty's views.
It's not his views, actually. There are others here who hold essentially the same views, or even possibly more conservative than his, who don't get the grief he does because they are consistent and not hypocritical...unlike him. He gets the grief because he is inconsistent and hypocritical.
and all you can do is smear.
No it isn't. There was a time, and it still occurs occasionally to this day, when I have attempted to honestly discuss issues with you. In fact, I have tried very hard to do so. But you've never been able to get past your own buffoonery of hypocricy, inconsistency and flat-out ignoring opposing views to allow it to happen.Phatscotty wrote:Don't get me wrong, I take your smear as the highest form of flattery. It means you know I am right, and you can't find a way to squirm out of it or justify your position (RARELY offered) or argue to the contrary, so I must be smeared, because it's all you got.
More accurately, it's all you're worth.
So, you admit that you don't want to talk the issues with me, and just want to troll???????
Phatscotty wrote:well, here is me, trying to honestly discuss and issue with you.... viewtopic.php?f=8&t=176256&start=45#p3852968 let's see how you handle that, that is, if you are not a hypocrite....
Users browsing this forum: Dukasaur