HapSmo19 wrote:spurgistan wrote:As well as improve the ability of our military to defend us?
Please elaborate on this one.
I can. By allowing them in without question, we're broadening our "recruit pool". The absolute worst-case scenario to come from that is that we don't improve out ability to defend the nation any, and that presumes that nobody else joins. It's unavoidable that we would improve our abilities by changing this policy. Wide range of recruits means greater talent that is accepted.
HapSmo19 wrote:spurgistan wrote:You want to give us some reason why this awful policy makes sense?
Sure. Undoing it opens the door for frivilous descrimination lawsuits that would undermine unit cohesion.
Frivolous discrimination lawsuits? We're talking about the military here...you can't sue the military while you're still in the military. However, presuming someone wants to do so after they leave the military...we're already seeing those anyway.
HapSmo19 wrote:I can also see the possibility of orders not being obeyed because someone thinks they're being picked on.
Thoroughly irrelevant. Disobeying a lawful order will have you either dead or jailed (depending on the particular circumstances involved in the disobedience). If the order is not lawful, then it should of course be disobeyed (but you damn well better not be wrong).
HapSmo19 wrote:See what I'm saying? Don't tell me it won't happen.
My 23 years in the military tells me this last one won't happen.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.