Moderator: Community Team
thegreekdog wrote:ViperOverLord wrote:I'm not saying the Beatles are my favorite. I am saying I regard them as the most talented band in the history of rock.
I think you need to listen to more Queen. Also Tool.
The Bison King wrote:They knew how to put together a good song with out using a 4/5 time signature where the vocals are timed to the Fibonacci sequence.)
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
The Bison King wrote:thegreekdog wrote:ViperOverLord wrote:I'm not saying the Beatles are my favorite. I am saying I regard them as the most talented band in the history of rock.
I think you need to listen to more Queen. Also Tool.
See this is why you don't like the beatles, you're looking for something completely different out of your music than what the Beatles delivered. Tool is about the most opposite music to the Beatles on Earth. Tool writes complex, un- relateable songs (un-relateabe songs unless you do shrooms once a month) The beatles wrote simple sentimental songs. You think the beatles are over rated because it's not what you like, but most people just want a nice tune with words they'll remember.
(also I should mention that I don't think the Beatles were particularly talented in a technicality sort of way but more fall into the creative genius sort of catagory. They knew how to put together a good song with out using a 4/5 time signature where the vocals are timed to the Fibonacci sequence.)
john9blue wrote:The Bison King wrote:They knew how to put together a good song with out using a 4/5 time signature where the vocals are timed to the Fibonacci sequence.)
this is not possible
The Bison King wrote:john9blue wrote:The Bison King wrote:They knew how to put together a good song with out using a 4/5 time signature where the vocals are timed to the Fibonacci sequence.)
this is not possible
Nothings impossible for Tool
Army of GOD wrote:The Bison King wrote:john9blue wrote:The Bison King wrote:They knew how to put together a good song with out using a 4/5 time signature where the vocals are timed to the Fibonacci sequence.)
this is not possible
Nothings impossible for Tool
Except making good songs.
inb4 rage
thegreekdog wrote:Psha! Tool is almost as good as Lady Gaga.
thegreekdog wrote:Psha! Tool is almost as good as Lady Gaga.
tzor wrote:thegreekdog wrote:Psha! Tool is almost as good as Lady Gaga.
What's wrong with Lady Gaga?
Army of GOD wrote:That dun make sense...
Army of GOD wrote:That dun make sense...
No one ever mentioned anything about Tool being popular. I was just saying THEY SUCK AND I HATE THEM.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
thegreekdog wrote:What? I've never heard a Lady Gaga song in my life (a 22 year old at work doesn't believe me, but I really haven't).
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
BigBallinStalin wrote:Shrooms, you say? Hmm....
TAAKA vodka is an acquired taste too. =P
My friends have incessantly hammered my skull with Tool, but I still find the singer's voice lame and lackluster, the lyrics OKAY + YAWN, but I do like the guitarist, bassist, and drummer, but not enough to become a fanboy.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users