Moderator: Community Team
Incandenza wrote:the.killing.44 wrote:Incandenza wrote:the.killing.44 wrote:I laughed my ass of during the Italian scene. Other than that, I didn't find anything funnyā¦
Oh, you disappoint me, young skywalker. Basterds was terrific, loved it in theaters, seen it twice more on DVD and loved it even more. Christoph Waltz is so goddamn good it's creepy.
Argh, I just don't see what was supposed to be funny.
Well, it's not like it's supposed to be a laugh a minute comedy. The laugh moments (like Hans pulling out his ludicrously oversized pipe during the first scene, or earlier in said scene when he uses flawless French to explain that he'd reached the end of his knowledge of the French language and could they please switch to English) tend to come as releases during almost unbearably tense scenes (which are the movie's true hallmark, anyone who hated the whole sequence in the tavern missed the point of the movie and probably rapes goats in their spare time).
I will freely acknowledge that part of my love for the movie comes from the fact that I've always been a big Tarantino fan (though not an unreserved one, Death Proof was terrible), and it was in fact Tarantino who first showed me that horrific violence could be funny (I saw Pulp Fiction at an impressionable age, and felt guilty for laughing when Travolta shot Marvin in the face). There's a lot of Tarantino-ish shit going on (in fact, one of the movie's rare missteps came when he repeated a song he'd used during the build-up to the house of blue leaves fight in Kill Bill), and part of the fun comes in seeing how many movie references he can pack into what's ostensibly a WWII revenge fantasy.
It occurs to me that this post would have been better with footnotes to replace the discursive parentheticals. Ah, well.
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
Aradhus wrote:Star trek is the worst movie I wathced last year. I couldn't even start to criticise it because I'd be here for hours. No originality, realism, I can't even continue, some people are way too easily pleased. Probably the same type of people who liked that godawful Superman disaster.
Snorri1234 wrote:Aradhus wrote:Star trek is the worst movie I wathced last year. I couldn't even start to criticise it because I'd be here for hours. No originality, realism, I can't even continue, some people are way too easily pleased. Probably the same type of people who liked that godawful Superman disaster.
What? I fucking loved Star Trek.
Aradhus wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:Aradhus wrote:Star trek is the worst movie I wathced last year. I couldn't even start to criticise it because I'd be here for hours. No originality, realism, I can't even continue, some people are way too easily pleased. Probably the same type of people who liked that godawful Superman disaster.
What? I fucking loved Star Trek.
Why? IT was dull, had no originality, lots of nice big stupid pointless effects, lots of shortcuts, predictability, poor dialogue, god awful plot. Such a bad movie. I'd have to watch it again to really cut it down to bite size pieces of awful.
What was good about it?
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Aradhus wrote:Woah, take a step back, gringo, I have no problem watching movies with little 'substance', Die Hard is one of my favourite movies. Star Trek was just shite, felt horribly contrived, poorly thought out, and wasn't entertaining. Entertaining is more than just bang bang boom boom. Whatever floats your boat. Star Trek was shite with too many flaws, devoid of nuance, and horrifically predictable.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users