Moderator: Community Team
Phatscotty wrote:The OP mostly deals with the social aspects of redefining marriage, but if anyone wants to get into the fiscal, ecclesiastical, discriminatory, historical, state, or other derivative aspects and unintentional consequences, we can have those discussions too.
new guy1 wrote:I feel as though everyone should have the right to marry.
crispybits wrote:Scotty - let me ask you one question - should men and women be treated legally differently? Should someone's gender (whatever their sexuality) be a grounds for different legal treatment by the government? Should a man be granted a right because he is a man, that a woman is denied because she is a woman (or vice versa)?
Phatscotty wrote:new guy1 wrote:I feel as though everyone should have the right to marry.
All people? no restrictions?
new guy1 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:new guy1 wrote:I feel as though everyone should have the right to marry.
All people? no restrictions?
I should have specified. In our species.
Phatscotty wrote:new guy1 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:new guy1 wrote:I feel as though everyone should have the right to marry.
All people? no restrictions?
I should have specified. In our species.
Is there an age limit?
Bones2484 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:new guy1 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:new guy1 wrote:I feel as though everyone should have the right to marry.
All people? no restrictions?
I should have specified. In our species.
Is there an age limit?
Two. Consenting. Adults.
Bones2484 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:new guy1 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:new guy1 wrote:I feel as though everyone should have the right to marry.
All people? no restrictions?
I should have specified. In our species.
Is there an age limit?
Two. Consenting first cousins.
There. That should cover all your bases.
notyou2 wrote:Pscotty, why do you care?
notyou2 wrote:Pscotty, why do you care?
Bones2484 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:new guy1 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:new guy1 wrote:I feel as though everyone should have the right to marry.
All people? no restrictions?
I should have specified. In our species.
Is there an age limit?
Two. Consenting. Adults.
There. That should cover all your bases.
Bones2484 wrote:notyou2 wrote:Pscotty, why do you care?
For the same reason he disagrees with hamsters now being able to vote once we started letting those women vote.
Bones2484 wrote:notyou2 wrote:Pscotty, why do you care?
For the same reason he disagrees with hamsters now being able to vote once we started letting those women vote.
Phatscotty wrote:crispybits wrote:Scotty - let me ask you one question - should men and women be treated legally differently? Should someone's gender (whatever their sexuality) be a grounds for different legal treatment by the government? Should a man be granted a right because he is a man, that a woman is denied because she is a woman (or vice versa)?
all people should be treated the same as much as we can. Of course I realize that women seem to have more rights when it comes to custody of a child. However "rights" have nothing to do with whether or not the person excersizing them is a male or a female. A person has rights.
Phatscotty wrote:Bones2484 wrote:notyou2 wrote:Pscotty, why do you care?
For the same reason he disagrees with hamsters now being able to vote once we started letting those women vote.
aren't you the one that posted this? Cuz it's all you so far
Unless you are just that up front about what you're doing?
Phatscotty wrote:notyou2 wrote:Pscotty, why do you care?
What does whether I care or not have anything to do with anything?
crispybits wrote:Phatscotty wrote:crispybits wrote:Scotty - let me ask you one question - should men and women be treated legally differently? Should someone's gender (whatever their sexuality) be a grounds for different legal treatment by the government? Should a man be granted a right because he is a man, that a woman is denied because she is a woman (or vice versa)?
all people should be treated the same as much as we can. Of course I realize that women seem to have more rights when it comes to custody of a child. However "rights" have nothing to do with whether or not the person excersizing them is a male or a female. A person has rights.
OK in that case I have person X and person Y. Without asking any questions about legally protected characteristics (such as race, religion or gender) can you please tell me if those two people should be allowed to form a legal marriage contract?
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: No registered users