mrswdk wrote:It's easy to be all hipster and denounce Columbus as a genocidal (lol) imperialist, but his actions need to be put into context. The world in Columbus' time was a hard world, and violence was the standard way to deal with violent resistance. He was operating in a part of the world that was home to the Aztecs (and later, when it was given the chance to govern itself again, psychos like Pinochet and the Argentinian military). In that context, he was really rather ordinary
It was a hard world, but even by the standards of the time he was a ruthless prick. Facial mutilation for being late with one's taxes was not a common punishment. Unprovoked war and conquest was considered barbaric, even by medieval standards (and considering this was well into the Renaissance, even judging him by medieval standards is allowing him more latitude than he deserves.) Pimping pre-pubescent girls was considered a moral outrage by any community. As for wholesale genocide, that is a special-order of crime that few have even attempted, and even fewer have succeeded at.