Pack Rat wrote:Votanic wrote:jonesthecurl wrote:pmac666 wrote:Army of Ado... ops, i mean army of god on their way to start civil war in Texas.
Mercy sakes alive, looks like we got us a convoy
So the side that is defending against invasion is the 'Army of Ado...'?
Using that same 'logic', Churchill must have been the one leading the 'Army of Ado...' back during the Blitz.
Clearly not an invasion, but a refugee issue.
Your comparisons to the blitz is silly...hardly logic.
No. It is
your silly word games carry no water.
If people enter without permission they are invaders/intruders, whatever they want to call themselves.
However, if you do think the invaders should be the one to define the situation, then you negate all laws of trespass (including rape and home invasion).
I also recall this quote stack that shows you are all for such attrocities,
but only when they befall people and politics that you don't support.(
Cross-posted from the 'Israel' thread)
Votanic wrote:Pack Rat wrote:Votanic wrote:Pack Rat wrote:bigtoughralf wrote:Right on cue
In your hypothetical example of a sniper in a house, are you supporting the IDF tactic of simply bombing the entire street until you can't see anything moving?
As much as the US/UK invasion of Iraq was diabolical and resulted in 1 million+ deaths in total, even the US military (not exactly known for being clinical) managed to invade and capture cities without nearly the level of civilian death or displacement that the IDF is causing in Gaza.
The ruthlessness of the Hamas terrorist attack on civilians which included torture, rape, murdering babies and the elderly on October 7th, was sickening....what did you expect? Ceasefire negotiations the following day?
The savagery resulted in a retaliation of revenge! What did the people of Gaza expected? Hamas and their followers got their just desserts. To bad so many civilians had to pay with their lives.
Ruthless terrorists? Just desserts?
So... what's the difference?
I guess all killers have there reasons... and no victim is ever innocent, ...just dead.
When you put that way, it does
almost sound like justice...
Who knows, maybe such virtue will come your way some time soon? Keep your fingers crossed.
German and Japanese civilians received their just desserts during World War II. They supported the massacre of civilians when they invaded their neighbors.
You reap what you sow
Then I will presume
you also apply that same logic to every murder, rape, disfigurement, abortion, torture, genocide, holocaust, and enslavement in history.
The only logical alternative would be some form of double-standard bias, bigotry, and hypocrisy.
So whether you call it
Karma, or any other word for such selectively moralistic rubbish, it only reveals your self-serving, politically-motivated, double standards.
Nothing more. That is unless you go further and make a
universal moralistic claim that
all human suffering is
equally justified and deserved.
It still sounds like voodoo claptrap to me, but at least it would be
unbiased voodoo claptrap.