Moderator: Community Team
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
tzor wrote:Mitochondrial Eve for the win!
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
tzor wrote:Mitochondrial Eve for the win!
Mitochondrial Eve is the female counterpart of Y-chromosomal Adam, the patrilineal most recent common ancestor, although they lived at different times
Neoteny wrote:Greg's... structured... post on sin creating sin reminded me that I have had a query for the religionists for a little while now. There is always talk of parts of the Bible being metaphoric and others not being so. I want to know how many CCers believe in a literal interpretation of the creation of man as found in Genesis.
In short, do you believe Adam and Eve were the first humans, and are responsible for the entry of sin into our universe?
I'd appreciate honest responses to this topic before it degenerates into everyone ignoring each other's points and me eventually skipping out on reading it after complaining about how retarded religion is. Thanks for your time.
Neoteny wrote:Greg's... structured... post on sin creating sin reminded me that I have had a query for the religionists for a little while now. There is always talk of parts of the Bible being metaphoric and others not being so. I want to know how many CCers believe in a literal interpretation of the creation of man as found in Genesis.
In short, do you believe Adam and Eve were the first humans, and are responsible for the entry of sin into our universe?
I'd appreciate honest responses to this topic before it degenerates into everyone ignoring each other's points and me eventually skipping out on reading it after complaining about how retarded religion is. Thanks for your time.
Gregrios wrote:
With that said. You'll probably find the majority of Christians do in fact beleive Genesis to be the literal truth.![]()
To any fellow Christians out there, please feel free to correct me if my observations are wrong.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Gregrios wrote:
With that said. You'll probably find the majority of Christians do in fact beleive Genesis to be the literal truth.![]()
To any fellow Christians out there, please feel free to correct me if my observations are wrong.
Depends upon your definition of "literal truth". I believe it is the literal truth ... I do not believe that Evolution is excluded by a long stretch. Nor do I believe that the true debate is even over religion. I believe that certain individuals exploit the fact that so much of science is incredibly difficult to understand, and folks inherent lack of time/unwillingness to do research along with a declining state of science education in general ... are truly behind this "debate". Look at the results of those who disbelieve evolution and the many things that go with this disbelief -- from challenging the whole idea of global warming to discounting effects of many chemicals to ... you name it... and religion has very, very little to do with it. BUT ... there is already a whole thread on this.
Gregrios wrote:Neoteny wrote:Greg's... structured... post on sin creating sin reminded me that I have had a query for the religionists for a little while now. There is always talk of parts of the Bible being metaphoric and others not being so. I want to know how many CCers believe in a literal interpretation of the creation of man as found in Genesis.
In short, do you believe Adam and Eve were the first humans, and are responsible for the entry of sin into our universe?
I'd appreciate honest responses to this topic before it degenerates into everyone ignoring each other's points and me eventually skipping out on reading it after complaining about how retarded religion is. Thanks for your time.
I probably beleive the Bible to be more literal than most Christians.![]()
With that said. You'll probably find the majority of Christians do in fact beleive Genesis to be the literal truth.![]()
To any fellow Christians out there, please feel free to correct me if my observations are wrong.
Gregrios wrote:With that said. You'll probably find the majority of Christians do in fact beleive Genesis to be the literal truth.![]()
tzor wrote:Gregrios wrote:With that said. You'll probably find the majority of Christians do in fact beleive Genesis to be the literal truth.![]()
I think you will find that a majority (now that's a hard term to define) might believe Genesis is the "truth" but not the "literal truth." You also need to consider Genesis in the context of the entire Torah (or the first five books of the Bible) as they are in many ways a stand alone collection. (Around the time of Jesus there was no term "Bible" but instead a three-fold naming of the Law (Torah) the Prophets and the other writings, together they constituted the scriptures, and not all groups placed equal wieght in the three types.)
Gregrios wrote:I find the Bible and science share at least one thing in common. When something is hard to understand it tends to get chalked up to the most simple answer.
Snorri1234 wrote:Isn't it a bit silly to condemn incest when the whole of humanity is a result of it. (It does explain a fair amount of stuff, I'll give you that.)
Jenos Ridan wrote:I tend to take a allegorical stance on the story of creation, largely the parts from Adam and Eve to just after the Tower of Babel. There did exist a "garden" and an "Adam and Eve", but the importance of the story is the message not the actions. The work of Dr. Hugh Ross largely influences my thinking on this, especially with regard to the "days" of creation; six "days" could mean six eras of development lasting as much as billions of years.
One theory (from History Channel I think) I heard regarding Cain and Abel was that the story was a passed down oral legend of an ancient bloodfeud between the early farmers and the early nomadic herdsmen. Needles to say, it seems that the herdsmen might have lost.
That all said, I am more concerned with how I and my fellow man gets along here on earth and how the relationship with God is doing. At the end of the day, the How doesn't concern me anymore nearly as much as the Why. The End Times also don't bother me, I'm never going to know the day or the hour it will happen but I should be ready, and be that by doing what I am called to be.
"His will be done, On Earth, as it is in Heaven," afterall.
Here you go.Neoteny wrote:Greg's... structured... post on sin creating sin reminded me that I have had a query for the religionists for a little while now. There is always talk of parts of the Bible being metaphoric and others not being so. I want to know how many CCers believe in a literal interpretation of the creation of man as found in Genesis.
In short, do you believe Adam and Eve were the first humans, and are responsible for the entry of sin into our universe?
I'd appreciate honest responses to this topic before it degenerates into everyone ignoring each other's points and me eventually skipping out on reading it after complaining about how retarded religion is. Thanks for your time.
got tonkaed wrote:considering something i saw on abc news last night claimed that around a quarter of most mainline protestant or roman catholic believers had some reservations about the existance of God...i highly doubt that claim about genesis is true.
*for those likely to ask, i did not catch the source of the poll, but i would assume it falls in the recently released category*
edit...psh like i cant find sources...google the pew forum and youll be on your way from there.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Users browsing this forum: Dukasaur