Moderator: Community Team
TheProwler wrote:I concede.
Just this once.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Frop wrote:Forced 'flaming' is boring as hell.
King_Herpes wrote:Frop wrote:Forced 'flaming' is boring as hell.
What about forced pregnancy?
Frop wrote:King_Herpes wrote:Frop wrote:Forced 'flaming' is boring as hell.
What about forced pregnancy?
Are you talking about serial rapists with a cause?
Allow me to clarify: Pairings are all going to be randomised. FW-Regulars will be teamed up with GD/OT-Regulars, etc etc.Ditocoaf wrote:Hmm... the flaming forum is challenging the random forum to a flame war...
Both are preferable. Both are flaming... both are completely acceptable. Welcome on board.Ditocoaf wrote:For it to be considered "flaming," do you always have to attack ad-hominim, or can you try to dismantle their argument elsewhere as well?
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
jonesthecurl wrote:Just to get this straight : is this the same thing as the PM from Bugger King was about? The flame-roasting thing? Or is this separate?
Both seem to have the same purpose, which is to make FW more interesting.
I've seldom ventured into FW, because (at least since I've been here) it hasn't been very interesting - mainly anaotomical comparisons and threatened insertions. Making it more interesting has to be a good thing, although I can live without it.
Frop wrote:Forced 'flaming' is boring as hell.
Frop wrote:Flaming is boring as hell.
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: No registered users