Moderator: Tournament Directors
oaktown wrote:finally somebody is dealing with the map change in a positive way - by playing the damn game!
What the hell, count me IN - and put me down as a fan of the NEW map!
Natewolfman wrote:let me ask though, if you are prompting the players to kinda ally each other anyways... why not just make the games doubles It would make this ALOT more efficient of a tournament, just friendly advice
T7 wrote:Though I'm not setting up 'doubles', I will be putting 2 "New Classic" people and 2 "Old Classic" people in each game. If the two people of the same 'view' want to play as an organised team in the game (instead of as individuals), I'd encourage it but that's up to them. Same rules as normal, make sure it's announced. As far as possible, I will match games in rank.
Good luck on your first tournament.
qwert wrote:well you send me invitation,and i accept to join these tournament
T7 wrote:Simply sign up with your choice of playing for the "New Classic map lovers" or "Old Classic map lovers".
TheProwler wrote:I concede.
Just this once.
T7 wrote:Natewolfman wrote:let me ask though, if you are prompting the players to kinda ally each other anyways... why not just make the games doubles It would make this ALOT more efficient of a tournament, just friendly advice
Three reasons, one that it's more interesting if people co-operate under their own steam (and choice) rather than being forced within a defined structure for it, two that some people are very doubles experienced and others aren't so it levels a few bumps in the playing field experience-wise, three the grand final might have three (or four!) of one particular 'side' so a doubles format would have to stop by the grand final - I'd rather have the same format all the way through.
So, to your -"Gad, what an idiot" smiley, I say -"Geez, why's anyone doing something different an idiot?" Heh heh, just levelling the smiley karma glad to have you aboard!
Natewolfman wrote:haha, touche to you sir
1) I suppose its a good justification, if you didnt have the other 2 reasons thuogh i dont think it would hold on its own
T7 wrote:Looks like you've got a lot of tournament experience, got a question for you - though I think I already know the answer. What's your thoughts on grouping according to rank? Random, in order of enrollment, grouped approx by rank, something else? I think it might be a silly question - the best player will win regardless, but thought you might have some insight?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users