Moderator: Community Team
SultanOfSurreal wrote:HardAttack wrote:This will improve the following aspects of the site:
- Obvious it is.
- Dont fool me.
i think this might be the greatest combination of words ever conceived
HardAttack wrote:Would you tell me some reasonable explanation please ?
BoganGod wrote:Yeah why has it been rejected?
HardAttack wrote:And also, why then there is officer call outs ? 2000+ call outs ?
Artimis wrote:This suggestion has already been made in a variety of reworded guises, to name but a few:
Choosing ranks that may enter your games?????
Set Rank Limits for starting games.
cap on ranks
Minimum rank to join games option
Limiting Experience level of players in a new game.
Score Limit for joining a game *previously rejected*
One of them has already been marked *previously rejected*, you guys really need to do a post search before making a suggestion. Otherwise you end up with epic duplication like this.
Artimis wrote:*YAWN*
Joodoo wrote:since you're premium, just make private games and ask ppl to pm you if they want the password...
and I'm still against rank segregation, I like playing with any rank anytime...
cowboyz wrote:Concise description:Add a button in the user panel that will block/foe all freemiums from joining my games. It will automatically unblock/unfoe them if they upgrade to premium membership.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
andy_is_awesome wrote:Not all fremiums are noobs, so it's not really fair.
I would like to see a block button however. For Example:
-Block players under 90% turns taken
-Block players under 4.0 rating
-Block players ranked ?
-Block players ranked cook
-Block players tagged suicider
In the mean time the solution is to set up private games and spam PM other CC players to get a game going (VERY INEFFECTIVE!)
cowboyz wrote:It just makes it easier for me to filter out people who I don't wish to play with.
Thezzaruz wrote:cowboyz wrote:It just makes it easier for me to filter out people who I don't wish to play with.
CC has been quite clear on their stance here, if you want to have a say about who you play with then use private games or the foe list.
The only block I'm really interested in would be weeding out players with really low attendance %.
Night Strike wrote:Just curious, why would you want lack to spend time coding something that keeps people from playing games rather than coding new options that would enhance the game play?
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Night Strike wrote:Just curious, why would you want lack to spend time coding something that keeps people from playing games rather than coding new options that would enhance the game play?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Hornet95 wrote:I could see blocking the '?'s from joining your games (as they are likely to deadbeat). But some of the freemiums are very loyal. I was a freemium for a long time and had an excellent record. Once you get past your first 5 or 10 games, you're typically hooked.
andy_is_awesome wrote:Not all fremiums are noobs, so it's not really fair.
I would like to see a block button however. For Example:
-Block players under 90% turns taken
-Block players under 4.0 rating
-Block players ranked ?
-Block players ranked cook
-Block players tagged suicider
In the mean time the solution is to set up private games and spam PM other CC players to get a game going (VERY INEFFECTIVE!)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users