Moderator: Cartographers
Blitzaholic wrote:Concise description:
the 3 least maps played per year should be seriously considered for revamping or removing.
Specifics:
check on a quarterly basis and report out the top 10 maps being played the least amount, then by years end the 3 maps that are rarely played or are played much more minimally then the rest automatically need revamping and or removing.
This will improve the following aspects of the site:
Having more playable maps if revamped and or same room for other maps if removed.
others thoughts?
Silvanus wrote:perch is a North Korean agent to infiltrate south Korean girls
Kotaro wrote:If you want something revamped... Do it yourself? You can't MAKE people revamp their maps; they've already worked long and hard to get it done. And besides that, making the map look any better won't distract from the shitty gameplay. If it's not fun, it doesn't matter if it's done by an artist made it, it won't be played.
Kotaro wrote:If you want something revamped... Do it yourself? You can't MAKE people revamp their maps; they've already worked long and hard to get it done. And besides that, making the map look any better won't distract from the shitty gameplay. If it's not fun, it doesn't matter if it's done by an artist made it, it won't be played.
hatchman wrote:I agree with Blitzy. Good idea.
Blitzaholic wrote:Are you totally stupid or just have stupid kotora? Your faulty tinted perception or reality is warped to the hilts, but if you are a still a little kid, that would explain it. I am not making anybody do anything, (hence the thread is named suggestions & bugs) this is just merely a SUGGESTION to help enhance any map that may not be played much, with some improvements it could be played more and gain popularity. This is NOT an insult to any map maker, but a suggestion on possible improvement.
Specifics:
check on a quarterly basis and report out the top 10 maps being played the least amount, then by years end the 3 maps that are rarely played or are played much more minimally then the rest automatically need revamping and or removing.
hatchman wrote:I would be curious to know which are the 5 least played maps. Anyone?
And Kotaro, surely you agree that a few maps are, shall we say, dated? Put your glasses on and have a look at the graphics. (I shall not name maps.)
Kotaro wrote:hatchman wrote:I would be curious to know which are the 5 least played maps. Anyone?
And Kotaro, surely you agree that a few maps are, shall we say, dated? Put your glasses on and have a look at the graphics. (I shall not name maps.)
I will agree that not every map looks like it was made by a graphic master, however, they all have pretty damn good gameplay, and I don't see any need for a revamp at all.
hatchman wrote:
How about retaining identical gameplay but sharpening up the graphics, make it more pleasing to zee eye?
3 maps that are rarely played or are played much more minimally then the rest automatically need revamping and or removing.
ender516 wrote:OliverFA has been working on a new XML Tutorial which covers (I think) the latest XML updates:
viewtopic.php?f=205&t=142787
Comments welcomed here: viewtopic.php?f=205&t=141794
I hope you find something of interest there, DiM. Welcome back!
DiM wrote:ender516 wrote:OliverFA has been working on a new XML Tutorial which covers (I think) the latest XML updates:
viewtopic.php?f=205&t=142787
Comments welcomed here: viewtopic.php?f=205&t=141794
I hope you find something of interest there, DiM. Welcome back!
your links do not works for me. it says: You are not authorised to read this forum.
thanks for the welcome
Users browsing this forum: No registered users