Moderator: Community Team
oVo wrote:I have not always been freemium, have given memberships to others
and don't miss FWs at all. I'm still trying to remember what it's best
attributes were from previous discussions.
ronc8649 wrote:nagerous wrote:More to the point only 21 users out of 19000 people on the scoreboard have bothered to vote to see flame wars returned and only about 4 or 5 users have been animated enough or care enough to post a request for it to be restored. Didn't you guys set up an off-shore flame wars forum on another site like pileofawesome? Oh yeah I forgot it failed because no-one cared enough to post there. If you really hate b.k barunt that much then drop him a PM with your vile abuse, I'm sure he hates you enough back to respond and you're both mature enough to not involve mods in your slanging match, no-one else cares.
nagerous. you know how many fucking people frequent the forums. it isnt 19000 jagoff. this poll has been up for one day. a sunday at that, and you have the courage to come in here with that line of bullshit.
seriously nagerous. of all people to talk, you arent the one. you belong to more groups than anyone i know.
"Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things".
why dont you go back to one of your book clubs, try to figure out who i am quoting, and dont go to fw if given back. but dont sit there and tell people to go to off shore sites. that is fucking patronizing at best.
not everything is about barunt. he was just another poster, while you are poser.
nagerous wrote:Flaming in the general discussion, really helps your case
Also, how does how many usergroups I am in mean anything at all? I barely post in any of them. In comparison, you have all 27 medals, you must be the height of cool.. you're not a nerd at all if that was the point you were obtusely trying to make. Also, don't you bring up my amount of usergroups every time I comment on one of your posts.. seriously get over it.
Aggressive, immature, threatening users like yourself are not wanted on this website and bringing back flame wars will simply attract more of your kind - now do everyone a favour and leave.. you are just one of a few straggling members of an old guard of flame-baiters.
Bruceswar wrote:Flamewars would be able to take all the threads that are cluttering up other parts of the forums. They would get shipped out down there, which would be great!
GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:Bringing back Flame Wars will:
1. Restore order to General Discussion
2. Stop the excess banning of REGULAR and/or PAYING members of the C.C. community.
3. Bring back REAL DEBATE and DISCUSSIONS, with-out the fear of the C.C. Thought Police.
4.Adding more flavor and flair to our poets out there.
5. AND last but not least of all, it was brutally FUN!
Woodruff wrote:I never intentionally entered Flamewars, but I was there unintentionally several times. I was not pleased.
King_Herpes wrote:Woodruff wrote:I never intentionally entered Flamewars, but I was there unintentionally several times. I was not pleased.
This is a prime example of why we have to be more careful of where we leave our drinks lying around the forums. Woodruff, you might not want to dress so provocatively so that you won't get mickied.
Artimis wrote:nagerous wrote:Flaming in the general discussion, really helps your case
Also, how does how many usergroups I am in mean anything at all? I barely post in any of them. In comparison, you have all 27 medals, you must be the height of cool.. you're not a nerd at all if that was the point you were obtusely trying to make. Also, don't you bring up my amount of usergroups every time I comment on one of your posts.. seriously get over it.
Aggressive, immature, threatening users like yourself are not wanted on this website and bringing back flame wars will simply attract more of your kind - now do everyone a favour and leave.. you are just one of a few straggling members of an old guard of flame-baiters.
Your pretence at maturity is insulting to the intellect. Perhaps your talent for argument would be more profitably utilised when directed at a more deserving target, like the progenitors of this current situation.
nagerous wrote:ronc8649 wrote:nagerous wrote:More to the point only 21 users out of 19000 people on the scoreboard have bothered to vote to see flame wars returned and only about 4 or 5 users have been animated enough or care enough to post a request for it to be restored. Didn't you guys set up an off-shore flame wars forum on another site like pileofawesome? Oh yeah I forgot it failed because no-one cared enough to post there. If you really hate b.k barunt that much then drop him a PM with your vile abuse, I'm sure he hates you enough back to respond and you're both mature enough to not involve mods in your slanging match, no-one else cares.
nagerous. you know how many fucking people frequent the forums. it isnt 19000 jagoff. this poll has been up for one day. a sunday at that, and you have the courage to come in here with that line of bullshit.
seriously nagerous. of all people to talk, you arent the one. you belong to more groups than anyone i know.
"Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things".
why dont you go back to one of your book clubs, try to figure out who i am quoting, and dont go to fw if given back. but dont sit there and tell people to go to off shore sites. that is fucking patronizing at best.
not everything is about barunt. he was just another poster, while you are poser.
Flaming in the general discussion, really helps your case
Also, how does how many usergroups I am in mean anything at all? I barely post in any of them. In comparison, you have all 27 medals, you must be the height of cool.. you're not a nerd at all if that was the point you were obtusely trying to make. Also, don't you bring up my amount of usergroups every time I comment on one of your posts.. seriously get over it.
Aggressive, immature, threatening users like yourself are not wanted on this website and bringing back flame wars will simply attract more of your kind - now do everyone a favour and leave.. you are just one of a few straggling members of an old guard of flame-baiters.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Skittles! wrote:Nick :/
What mod licked your arse? Or did you lick theirs?
Or did you just want to become a natural brown noser?
mpjh wrote:FW was a cesspool of inane scatological references dispersed between childish vulgarities. It contained no imaginative writing, no creative thought, and nothing more than young men acting out. The uncontrolled anger of FW spilled out into other forums leaving a low water stain everywhere. Good riddance.
mpjh wrote:Gee, general, you need to learn the difference between criticism and flames. One uses reasoned logic and polite language (criticism) and the other just strings a bunch of offensive words together for effect. I am a strong advocate of criticism.
I find it interesting that you cannot really defend FW, only attack me personally.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
AndyDufresne wrote:Collected 'Bring Back Flame Wars' Suggestions for those interested.
--Andy
Woodruff wrote:AndyDufresne wrote:Collected 'Bring Back Flame Wars' Suggestions for those interested.
--Andy
If FlameWars comes back, you must implement some much easier way to tell if a thread has been moved to FlameWars or not, to prevent the innocent relocation into FlameWars.
GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:Woodruff wrote:AndyDufresne wrote:Collected 'Bring Back Flame Wars' Suggestions for those interested.
--Andy
If FlameWars comes back, you must implement some much easier way to tell if a thread has been moved to FlameWars or not, to prevent the innocent relocation into FlameWars.
Do you need glasses to see? Flame War Forum, what's not to know? Maybe we can have C.C. use flashing red lights with a skull and cross bones yelling, "WARNING-WARNING-WARNING WILL ROBINSON!"
GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:Board index ‹General<General Discussion
Look at upper left hand corner under Forum, now if you're at Turtle Soup, it'll say Turtle Soup instead of General Discussion. The same could be said about Flame Wars.
Otherwise, Flashing red lights with a skull and cross bones yelling WARNING-WARNING-WARNING WILL ROBINSON, you're entering the Flame Wars Forum WARNING-WARNING-WARNING!!! This would give anyone who truly fears Flame Wars a warning.
Woodruff wrote:GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:Board index ‹General<General Discussion
Look at upper left hand corner under Forum, now if you're at Turtle Soup, it'll say Turtle Soup instead of General Discussion. The same could be said about Flame Wars.
Otherwise, Flashing red lights with a skull and cross bones yelling WARNING-WARNING-WARNING WILL ROBINSON, you're entering the Flame Wars Forum WARNING-WARNING-WARNING!!! This would give anyone who truly fears Flame Wars a warning.
True, it does say that but if I'm involved in a discussion which I BELIEVE is somewhere else, I'm not necessarily going to look up there. Then again, I suppose I shouldn't have expected to hold a rational discussion with you on the subject. My attempt to show how to better keep FlameWars around meets only sarcasm from you. Fine...don't get FlameWars back...see if I care.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users