Moderator: Community Team
Megadeth666 wrote::-$ while attacking 3-1 , hold down the Ctrl and Alt button you will always win
RADAGA wrote:Maybe. Funny thing is that on some games I am very lucky, while on others, it is automatic: m iss one or two 3x1 before getting. It is not uniform.
The Neon Peon wrote:RADAGA wrote:Maybe. Funny thing is that on some games I am very lucky, while on others, it is automatic: m iss one or two 3x1 before getting. It is not uniform.
That is THE most hilarious post I've read in a long while.
Thanks.
RADAGA wrote:I should win a prize.
RADAGA wrote:I should win a prize.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT THE DICE ARE RIGHT. THEY MIGHT BE FOR BULK VALUES, BUT THEY DO PRESENT STREAKS.
I think, now, without any emotion, having vented it already, that the so called random of random.org might be cyclical - simplifying it generates data like that:
112112322334344545656566
(this streak have 4 of each number, and would be a "uniform" distribuition when analysed.
TheMissionary wrote:With what you are saying about the 500,000 rolls regenerating, that would mean the odds were much better of being random if we do actually use auto attack. With this point forwards, does that mean that if someone else uses auto at the exact same time, are the odds of random split between the 2 different users? I personally have found that the dice can be particularly lucky for few days, then be the complete opposite for a period afterward. I've noticed a pattern in how my rank fluctuates, and I'm fairly sure that my game play technique doesn't change that sporadically. I'll reach my high score, maybe beat it by 70-100 points. Then it seems the luck changes, whether it be dice or drops, and I'll end up about the same point differential above my low score. This seems to be the pattern in my game play experience. Sure in the long run I'm gaining points, but it only seems to do that if I avoid 1v1 games where the odds are usually to 1 person or the other from the start of the game.
I had, posted stats here, they were ignored. Whatever.No one's stats show an abnormal skew towards the defender.
And here's another angle - isn't everyone using these same "broken" dice...? Yet you're the only one losing games...
BigBallinStalin wrote:Can someone please throw down the stats for:
3 x 2:
2 attackers die:
2 defenders die:
each lose one:
I found some crap on wikipedia, but I highly doubt it...
captainwalrus wrote:If you never get really really bad dice then the dice aren't truly random. No roll is impossible only infinently improbable, and therefore guaranteed to happen, it just sucks that it happened to you.
But, if you are right, and the dice aren't random, do you have the pattern they follow figured out? Shouldn't by now you be able to make it so you win much more than you loose, by rolling in certain combinations or something? If I roll as certain sequence, would you be able to tell me what number comes next?
RADAGA wrote:All those, also not random, no probability involved, only physiscs.
Timminz wrote:RADAGA wrote:All those, also not random, no probability involved, only physiscs.
Pointing out that your own examples do not apply, is the funniest thing I've read all morning.
Radaga wrote:and dont point i am being aggressive. ALL I have been seen here are Ad Hominem arguments, so, deal with it.
for the record, since I might have to explain later anyway>
Ad hominem, formal fallacy: an argument that attacks the person who holds a view or advances an argument, rather than commenting on the view or responding to the argument.
THEN I LOST EIGHT 3X1
THIS IS UTTERLY RIDICULOUS. THIS MONTH ALONE I GOT THREE EIGHT-IN-A-ROW, TWO SEVEN-IN-A-ROW AND SEVERAL FOURS AND THREES.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT THE DICE ARE RIGHT.
Fallacious argument. I cannot tell the results the same way you cannot list me all possible moves on a chess match on the 10th round.
If you do list me all the possible board settings for a 10th round of chess, and tell me where each piece will be placed on each hypotesis, I will think about figureing out the dice.
Chess moves are NOT random, each piece have fixed rules on how they move. Go ahead.
After that, you can predict me the trajetory of all snooker balls after a cue hit. When you succeed, evolve to all the possible trajetories for all the possible angles and intensities the cue can interact weith the white ball.
All those, also not random, no probability involved, only physiscs.
Lame me, trying to get a (paying) LT territories.
Game 5875491
I had 14 armies. He had 4 territories, one with 3, 4 with a single.
After conquering the 3 army stack, I had 10 left , 3 more territores to go, one on each.
Afetr conquering the first one, I had five armies left.
After conquering the second one, I had NO MORE ARMIES.
14 x 3 - lost 3 left one behind
10x1 - lost 4, left one behind (three of them sixes)
5x1 lost 2, left one behind (one six)
1x1 - lost to yet another six.
So, not even the odds were ALL WRONG, but in 9 rolls, defence rolled 5 sixes. OVER 50%.
I should learn, and stop trying to attack premium officers.
Aaaand as usual, the kill and the cards will be given to another player. Reason - bad strategy - I thought 21 armies would suffice to get 7 defended-by-one territories. Silly me to believe there would be no streaks.
I should have known I would have four "loose 3 armies to 3x1 attacks" before getting it. on this run.
So I spent twenty one armies to get 6 territories. leaving 1 behind, and one on every conquered, I lost fourteen (and killed six) armies on this feeble attempt. Of course this is to be expected every time you try such, here. 14-to-six ration on 3x1 attacks are common... here.
and of course you will say that it is perfect possible forthis to happen.
Here in brazil, a man won 23 times in the lottery. He said that this was perfectly normal, and that only God´s hand helped him.
He is in jail, now, because "god" in his dictionary means "fraud the system"
I wonder what "random" means here...
I should win a prize.
EIGHT 3X1 LOSSES IN A ROW!!!!!
11 ARMIES TO KILL 3. I GOT THE FIRST 3X2 FULL, THE ENEMY STOOD WITH ONLY 1 ARMY.
THEN I LOST EIGHT 3X1
THIS IS UTTERLY RIDICULOUS. THIS MONTH ALONE I GOT THREE EIGHT-IN-A-ROW, TWO SEVEN-IN-A-ROW AND SEVERAL FOURS AND THREES.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT THE DICE ARE RIGHT. THEY MIGHT BE FOR BULK VALUES, BUT THEY DO PRESENT STREAKS.
I think, now, without any emotion, having vented it already, that the so called random of random.org might be cyclical - simplifying it generates data like that:
112112322334344545656566
(this streak have 4 of each number, and would be a "uniform" distribuition when analysed.
that would be logical, since it reads data from the atmosphere, and those should increase and decrease gradually, generating those "random, but not quite so" data.
Any kind of vicious repetition in a system that favor one side when ties happen is catastrophic.
That explain the freak results we get when autorolling - either losing everything and killing almost none or killing a lot and losing way too few
And would explain the rows of losses on, in my case, 3x1
C´mon, guys eight losses in a row when rolling 3x1 is not normal, it is something that should be more rare than picking the right lottery numbers. To have THREE of such occorences within less than one thousand rolls is just plain wrong.
Ad hominem, formal fallacy: an argument that attacks the person who holds a view or advances an argument, rather than commenting on the view or responding to the argument.
Thats good. Whitout people like you many bad comedians would starve.
Maybe. Funny thing is that on some games I am very lucky, while on others, it is automatic: m iss one or two 3x1 before getting. It is not uniform.
RADAGA wrote:But I understand I might have been too sophisticated in my line of thought. Perhaps I should stick to apples and bananas, and Bob and Sue when talking math here.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users