Moderator: Community Team
Army of GOD wrote:I joined this game because it's so similar to Call of Duty.
Luke 17:20 (New American Standard Bible) wrote:
Now having been questioned by the Pharisees as to when the kingdom of God was coming, He answered them and said, "The kingdom of God is not coming with signs to be observed;
bedub1 wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:I joined this game because it's so similar to Call of Duty.
CreepersWiener wrote:I am looking for evidence of God. If any of you have any...please post it here.
2dimes wrote:Sorry there's no such thing as proof, you must make your own decision to accept or reject God.Luke 17:20 (New American Standard Bible) wrote:
Now having been questioned by the Pharisees as to when the kingdom of God was coming, He answered them and said, "The kingdom of God is not coming with signs to be observed;
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
edocsil wrote:Any proof is a steaming pile of shit. Any priest who says otherwise is a liar. If someone happens to believe, I do not hold it against them, but I hate it when people bring up "Irreducible Complexity of Evolution" or other pseudo science that makes their religion seem to be more accurate then science.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
PLAYER57832 wrote:CreepersWiener wrote:I am looking for evidence of God. If any of you have any...please post it here.
God is ultimately a matter of belief.
But then, you cannot prove there is NO God, either.
The proof for either comes within.
Army of GOD wrote:I joined this game because it's so similar to Call of Duty.
Neoteny wrote:[img].jpg[/img]
CreepersWiener wrote:Why must the burden of proof be upon the non-believers? It should and always will rest upon the believers to bring forth evidence of the existence of God. And I am willing to listen. So please, can we keep the posts limited to the evidence only.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
CreepersWiener wrote:I really don't mind people posting images as evidence for God.
PLAYER57832 wrote:
Scientifically speaking, I would never say I can prove God exists. Yet, in many ways faith in religion is actually stronger than mere empiracle evidence (and mind you, this is a scientist speaking).
Army of GOD wrote:I joined this game because it's so similar to Call of Duty.
Neoteny wrote:That's just how I roll.
I'm just saying. The argument from suffering is really one of the more convincing arguments I've seen to demonstrate that even if there is a god, there isn't much reason to worship him.
CreepersWiener wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:
Scientifically speaking, I would never say I can prove God exists. Yet, in many ways faith in religion is actually stronger than mere empiracle evidence (and mind you, this is a scientist speaking).
So, then, your belief is that in believing in God, it allows you to look "beyond" the box and come into new insights and discoveries about the nature and the universe?
CreepersWiener wrote:Could the same thing come from believing in Dungeon and Dragons or Harry Potter?
PLAYER57832 wrote:CreepersWiener wrote:I really don't mind people posting images as evidence for God.
The problem is in an old thread. Someone posts all these wonderful pictures that they see as "proof of God".
But then, along come the synics with some pretty disturbing pictures.
We all know those things exist. We discuss them. But, this site is visited by kids, etc...and few people wants to face pictures of a disembowled baby while cruising a thread, drinking their coffee in the morning.
Army of GOD wrote:I joined this game because it's so similar to Call of Duty.
CreepersWiener wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:CreepersWiener wrote:I really don't mind people posting images as evidence for God.
The problem is in an old thread. Someone posts all these wonderful pictures that they see as "proof of God".
But then, along come the synics with some pretty disturbing pictures.
We all know those things exist. We discuss them. But, this site is visited by kids, etc...and few people wants to face pictures of a disembowled baby while cruising a thread, drinking their coffee in the morning.
Okay, I don't mind the posting of pictures as long as they aren't overly graphic. And what you mentioned seems pretty bad, but what Neotony posted seemed okay, and I got the message from it, as well from Bedubs first post.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Neoteny wrote:That's just how I roll.
I'm just saying. The argument from suffering is really one of the more convincing arguments I've seen to demonstrate that even if there is a god, there isn't much reason to worship him.
It is a compelling argument. But the answer is simply that the alternative would be worse. We may not see it, understand it, but most who believe pretty much accepts some version of that.
PLAYER57832 wrote:CreepersWiener wrote:I really don't mind people posting images as evidence for God.
The problem is in an old thread. Someone posts all these wonderful pictures that they see as "proof of God".
But then, along come the synics with some pretty disturbing pictures.
We all know those things exist. We discuss them. But, this site is visited by kids, etc...and few people wants to face pictures of a disembowled baby while cruising a thread, drinking their coffee in the morning.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Return to Out, out, brief candle!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users