Moderator: Community Team
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Snorri1234 wrote:god you're dumb.
Timminz wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:god you're dumb.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
bedub1 wrote:FYI, I'm sure republicans do this too. I hate politicians.
Phatscotty wrote:your "numbers" and "facts" and "statistics" make my head hurt. I'll probably make a comment that has nothing to do with the issue at hand and then call you a name.
Phatscotty wrote:smoking beaners is bad for those baby nuts
hecter wrote:bedub1 wrote:FYI, I'm sure republicans do this too. I hate politicians.
So, why the "liberal" comment, why make such a distinction? It serves no purpose other than to try to insult and belittle your point. I mean, don't get me wrong, the total budget is increasing, but why make such a distinction?Phatscotty wrote:your "numbers" and "facts" and "statistics" make my head hurt. I'll probably make a comment that has nothing to do with the issue at hand and then call you a name.
I see numbers, but few facts and no statistics. I bet Bedub would be absolutely THRILLED if the budget was only 3.25 billion.
Timminz wrote:Phatscotty wrote:smoking beaners is bad for those baby nuts
sig'd
I made the liberal comment because it's the current Democrats that are doing this. I don't know of any Republicans doing it, but I'm sure they do. I also would be thrilled if it was only 3.25 billion. I think it's more like 20 and we have a 3.5 billion shortfall.hecter wrote:bedub1 wrote:FYI, I'm sure republicans do this too. I hate politicians.
So, why the "liberal" comment, why make such a distinction? It serves no purpose other than to try to insult and belittle your point. I mean, don't get me wrong, the total budget is increasing, but why make such a distinction?Phatscotty wrote:your "numbers" and "facts" and "statistics" make my head hurt. I'll probably make a comment that has nothing to do with the issue at hand and then call you a name.
I see numbers, but few facts and no statistics. I bet Bedub would be absolutely THRILLED if the budget was only 3.25 billion.
Stop scaring me.tzor wrote:If you think that's fun, you should see math at the Federal level.
When you borrow from yourself, it's not really borrowing, even though you do have to pay it back eventually.
And it's not debt either, even though ... it is.
Exactly! they are cutting the INCREASE so they are still increasing it...just not as much. But then they claim they are actually reducing their spending...which is a lie.beezer wrote:One thing I remember from the budget battles of the 1990s is that whenever Congress didn't raise spending by as much as they originally projected, they would call that a cut. Yes, a cut in the rate of increase was actually viewed as a real cut. Perhaps that's what Washington state is trying to claim. I don't really know because bedub said he didn't have the specific numbers.
Phatscotty wrote:it doesn't matter. I lump facts, numbers, and statistics all into the same category, and then they are immediately dismissed equally
bedub1 wrote: I also would be thrilled if it was only 3.25 billion. I think it's more like 20 and we have a 3.5 billion shortfall.
Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
hecter wrote:Phatscotty wrote:it doesn't matter. I lump facts, numbers, and statistics all into the same category, and then they are immediately dismissed equally
Right... You realize those are all very different things, don't you?bedub1 wrote: I also would be thrilled if it was only 3.25 billion. I think it's more like 20 and we have a 3.5 billion shortfall.
I'm pretty sure it's actually closer to 3.5 trillion...
bedub1 wrote:FYI, I'm sure republicans do this too.
jbrettlip wrote:Wow, I have never seen Woodruff get so disjointed.
jbrettlip wrote:Usually you are much wittier, Woody!
Woodruff wrote:jbrettlip wrote:Wow, I have never seen Woodruff get so disjointed.
Really? I find that odd.jbrettlip wrote:Usually you are much wittier, Woody!
I am?
jbrettlip wrote:Woodruff wrote:jbrettlip wrote:Wow, I have never seen Woodruff get so disjointed.
Really? I find that odd.jbrettlip wrote:Usually you are much wittier, Woody!
I am?
yes, you usually seem to have smart ass comments (which I like) as opposed to name calling. Also with your Spock avatar, it makes name calling that much funnier.
Woodruff wrote:Sometimes, the blunt truth is the only way to make a point.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:Woodruff wrote:Sometimes, the blunt truth is the only way to make a point.
LOL that was actually a good one.
jbrettlip wrote:Wow, I have never seen Woodruff get so disjointed. That made me laugh, so I reported his post. Usually you are much wittier, Woody!
Government is corrupt and spending money we don't have. ALL of them. Every government on the planet. The beauty is the US govt owns acres of land, natural resources and military weaponary. We owe meaningless pieces of paper. Eventually our ICBM's will pay off our debts (by vaporizing our creditors.)
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: pmac666