nippersean wrote:mattattam wrote:edwinissweet wrote:
Also, i think that if you are going to get points from 4 people, that you are putting yourself on the line 4 times. If a farmer were to seek low ranks to play, a game like this could cost him 200-300 points.
That is a really good point. The potential to lose that many points could deter farming. Personally I don't see why people care about farmers.
Not really (i.e totally the opposite). If a decent quads team put in for a public game - they could hammered by an expert at quads who would get 60 pts a pop.
It would be the way to go to make conqueror.
It may discourage people from leaving public games open to be picked off (when they thought it'd be team vs team).
I think this proposal should get back on track.
It's a great 1v1 idea.
before the game opened you would be able to choose if your game is a normal quads, or if its a 1 vs team