Moderator: Community Team
lord voldemort wrote:thats a fault in the escalating ban system not the actual offence.
I said it in the thread that the best you could hope for was a warning.
He clearly cheated and only got a warning from it because it was his first offence
lord voldemort wrote:not how it works...obviously...its suprising eddie...for a guy who has not much of a life except to be on cc. you really know little of how things are run around here
eddie2 wrote:listen i dont care who the player was but feel he abused someone elses account. and to only get a warning is very light.
eddie2 wrote:lord voldemort wrote:not how it works...obviously...its suprising eddie...for a guy who has not much of a life except to be on cc. you really know little of how things are run around here
point dumping = auto ban if they had a warning or not so what you are saying is all players that point dump but never had a warning should not be striped of premium and banned. will cc reinburse them said players and put the record straight because like you just said
not how it works...obviously. but it does work in that case.
listen i dont care who the player was but feel he abused someone elses account. and to only get a warning is very light.
Bones2484 wrote:I think a bigger punishment would have been a point increase for Jobiwan. Then he'd lose one of his dummy accounts and have to try to find someone else's to take over... I mean, give directions to.
Mr Changsha wrote:I disagree Fc. Quite sincerely. May i suggest that you are looking a this from the standpoint of a sequential general. And you are quite right that a high ranker should have the right to put a striper or lower on their team. I've always followed this approach when i play in such exalted circles and often suggest they do it.
The issue is that he dumped point. This results in a point reset if you do it to your own account so I think it should if you do it to someone else's.
Let me repeat..this is not about cheating to keep your score high (i've supported almost everyone who has done that...i often positively approve of it)..it is about dumping points.
gradybridges wrote:Is it a warning for 1 infraction or many? When was the last time Jobiwan was actually on? Did he even have a death in the family or did someone else wall me that?
I guess the tainted Conqueror title is a fitting punishment. Like Bonds, Clemens, or Sosa. They might have gotten away with it, have loyalists support them, but any records they hold are tainted.
eddie2 wrote:lol i see there is one vote for nothing has blitz been here
eddie2 wrote:i really cannot believe they have came back with a warning for this case.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Woodruff wrote:eddie2 wrote:i really cannot believe they have came back with a warning for this case.
I must say that I agree. There have been other situations in which the egregiousness of the offense was such that the ladder system was ignored. Which is precisely how this should have been handled. But I'm not sure why any of us would expect common sense or good judgement to rule.
But then, theherkman didn't have the ears of those in charge, I suppose...
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users