Moderator: Community Team
Strife wrote:I hereby state Martin Ronne has inappropriately touched me. I would like to file charges against this sick bastard and expect he be sent to prison.
Strife wrote:I hereby state Martin Ronne has inappropriately touched me. I would like to file charges against this sick bastard and expect he be sent to prison.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
iamkoolerthanu wrote:Sooo first to get a set, wins, on most maps?
Strife wrote:I hereby state Martin Ronne has inappropriately touched me. I would like to file charges against this sick bastard and expect he be sent to prison.
naxus wrote:isn't most troops you can move at once on a map 9999 or something(from the XML)?
Crazyirishman wrote:Why don't you just go all the way and make it first person to get a set gets a 1000? The strategy involved that that process is unbelievable
HardAttack wrote:BS. Dont get the neccesity of spoiling the current escalating game play and adding a new modification in it.
If you are liking extremes, go bungee jump somewhere, or take ur parachute, dress it up then jump down from a skyscraper.
Please folks, do not post suggestions here with unclear and foggy additions which your suggestion wud brought up in gaming pleasure.
I dont understand personally what such escalating mechanism will come with.
Such an escalation will come with problems. One very clear is games will have many turn missers. A player, surely is not going to like it cashing 25 or 50 less troops but sure he will miss a turn. I suggest you to learn the current escalating better, and get delighted with the use of your skill and abilities with it.
HardAttack wrote:20.000 or more members, what if all will ask for something new. Please lets keep gaming pleasure solid, and not make it a mess with tones of no sense options.
Strife wrote:I hereby state Martin Ronne has inappropriately touched me. I would like to file charges against this sick bastard and expect he be sent to prison.
TheForgivenOne wrote:naxus wrote:isn't most troops you can move at once on a map 9999 or something(from the XML)?
Correct.
Strife wrote:I hereby state Martin Ronne has inappropriately touched me. I would like to file charges against this sick bastard and expect he be sent to prison.
Martin Ronne wrote:TheForgivenOne wrote:naxus wrote:isn't most troops you can move at once on a map 9999 or something(from the XML)?
Correct.
So that's the most you can move at once, but could you theoretically have more on a map?
Martin Ronne wrote:TheForgivenOne wrote:naxus wrote:isn't most troops you can move at once on a map 9999 or something(from the XML)?
Correct.
So that's the most you can move at once, but could you theoretically have more on a map?
Martin Ronne wrote:iamkoolerthanu wrote:Sooo first to get a set, wins, on most maps?
If you bothered to read the first part, you'd realized that it stays at the same rate as regular escalating spoils until 50.
Metsfanmax wrote:Martin Ronne wrote:TheForgivenOne wrote:naxus wrote:isn't most troops you can move at once on a map 9999 or something(from the XML)?
Correct.
So that's the most you can move at once, but could you theoretically have more on a map?
Yes, and you can attack with more as well. But if you conquer, you just can't advance with more than the 10000 limit.
By the way... I love this suggestion.
Strife wrote:I hereby state Martin Ronne has inappropriately touched me. I would like to file charges against this sick bastard and expect he be sent to prison.
iamkoolerthanu wrote:Martin Ronne wrote:iamkoolerthanu wrote:Sooo first to get a set, wins, on most maps?
If you bothered to read the first part, you'd realized that it stays at the same rate as regular escalating spoils until 50.
Sorry, but like pointed out, there would be turn missers
I would hate to cash a set of 50 and then have my opponent get a cash of 75, 100, 150, and then it be my turn.. if I wasn't dead
Strife wrote:I hereby state Martin Ronne has inappropriately touched me. I would like to file charges against this sick bastard and expect he be sent to prison.
Victor Sullivan wrote:From a mapmaking perspective, this is a nightmare. The Foundry would have to enforce a 8888 policy, instead of a 888 policy, and older maps would suffer for not being up to 8888 standards...
Metsfanmax wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:From a mapmaking perspective, this is a nightmare. The Foundry would have to enforce a 8888 policy, instead of a 888 policy, and older maps would suffer for not being up to 8888 standards...
Can you translate that to layman's terms please?
TheForgivenOne wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:From a mapmaking perspective, this is a nightmare. The Foundry would have to enforce a 8888 policy, instead of a 888 policy, and older maps would suffer for not being up to 8888 standards...
Can you translate that to layman's terms please?
Basically, when all maps go through the foundry process, they have to show a test, where "888" is put on all the territories numbers would be, to make sure nothing overlaps. Apparently this is hard enough at the 888 policy, and going to an 8888 policy would make it harder. (888 would be a troop number).
Strife wrote:I hereby state Martin Ronne has inappropriately touched me. I would like to file charges against this sick bastard and expect he be sent to prison.
Return to Archived Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users