Moderator: Community Team
ad10r3tr0 wrote:No way! wants to play the game if you don't get any benefits(points) out of it? What about this... under start new game, you have a ranked or unranked option. Ranked you play for points, unranked you do. When NR first start the website, they can only play unranked, however, they dont have a map restriction and can play any setting...
demonfork wrote:Playing against new recruits or having new recruits join your games from time to time is not against the rules.
TheForgivenOne wrote:demonfork wrote:Playing against new recruits or having new recruits join your games from time to time is not against the rules.
From time to time, yes. But if the only games you play attract New Recruits and you constantly set these games up over and over, than you will get warned/point reset.
Woodruff wrote:TheForgivenOne wrote:demonfork wrote:Playing against new recruits or having new recruits join your games from time to time is not against the rules.
From time to time, yes. But if the only games you play attract New Recruits and you constantly set these games up over and over, than you will get warned/point reset.
Which is a really stupid rule, of course.
TheForgivenOne wrote:Woodruff wrote:TheForgivenOne wrote:demonfork wrote:Playing against new recruits or having new recruits join your games from time to time is not against the rules.
From time to time, yes. But if the only games you play attract New Recruits and you constantly set these games up over and over, than you will get warned/point reset.
Which is a really stupid rule, of course.
Really? How so?
Woodruff wrote:TheForgivenOne wrote:Woodruff wrote:TheForgivenOne wrote:demonfork wrote:Playing against new recruits or having new recruits join your games from time to time is not against the rules.
From time to time, yes. But if the only games you play attract New Recruits and you constantly set these games up over and over, than you will get warned/point reset.
Which is a really stupid rule, of course.
Really? How so?
The idea that you can be punished FOR SOMEONE ELSE'S ACTIONS is ludicrious. If someone is INVITING newbies to their games, sure then there's a case. But being punished because someone else joins your games of their own free choosing without impetus from you is an idiotic concept that goes against justice in almost every aspect. It's really quite sick, in my opinion.
TheForgivenOne wrote:Woodruff wrote:TheForgivenOne wrote:Woodruff wrote:TheForgivenOne wrote:From time to time, yes. But if the only games you play attract New Recruits and you constantly set these games up over and over, than you will get warned/point reset.
Which is a really stupid rule, of course.
Really? How so?
The idea that you can be punished FOR SOMEONE ELSE'S ACTIONS is ludicrious. If someone is INVITING newbies to their games, sure then there's a case. But being punished because someone else joins your games of their own free choosing without impetus from you is an idiotic concept that goes against justice in almost every aspect. It's really quite sick, in my opinion.
So we should let people abuse this?
TheForgivenOne wrote:People have already shot up the scoreboard because all they did was create settings, where 9/10 games had NR's join.
TheForgivenOne wrote:And the few times actual opponents joined the games, said user dropped that game.
TheForgivenOne wrote:Purposely TRYING to play NR's?
TheForgivenOne wrote:Or why else would he have dropped games against opponents of actual calibur?
Woodruff wrote:TheForgivenOne wrote:Woodruff wrote:TheForgivenOne wrote:Woodruff wrote:
Which is a really stupid rule, of course.
Really? How so?
The idea that you can be punished FOR SOMEONE ELSE'S ACTIONS is ludicrious. If someone is INVITING newbies to their games, sure then there's a case. But being punished because someone else joins your games of their own free choosing without impetus from you is an idiotic concept that goes against justice in almost every aspect. It's really quite sick, in my opinion.
So we should let people abuse this?
Abuse what? The rule should be that you can't JOIN GAMES with newbies...THAT is something you can control. As well, as I mentioned above, you should not be able to send invitations to newbies...again, THAT is something you can control. Who joins your games? You can't control that.
lackattack wrote:"Newbie Farming" is the technique of setting up as many games as possible (either by starting or joining them) with New Recruits
TheForgivenOne wrote:And you can easily just up the amount of players to 6, VIOLA! You won't get New Recruits.
TheForgivenOne wrote:Woodruff wrote:TheForgivenOne wrote:Woodruff wrote:The idea that you can be punished FOR SOMEONE ELSE'S ACTIONS is ludicrious. If someone is INVITING newbies to their games, sure then there's a case. But being punished because someone else joins your games of their own free choosing without impetus from you is an idiotic concept that goes against justice in almost every aspect. It's really quite sick, in my opinion.
So we should let people abuse this?
Abuse what? The rule should be that you can't JOIN GAMES with newbies...THAT is something you can control. As well, as I mentioned above, you should not be able to send invitations to newbies...again, THAT is something you can control. Who joins your games? You can't control that.lackattack wrote:"Newbie Farming" is the technique of setting up as many games as possible (either by starting or joining them) with New Recruits
According to that, STARTING GAMES WITH NEW RECRUITS is apart of the Farming rule.
TheForgivenOne wrote:That players score is not representing there skill if they shoot up the scoreboard all because a ton on NR's deadbeat against him and he gets free points.
TheForgivenOne wrote:You can't claim ignorance all because "WELL OTHER PEOPLE COULD EASILY JOIN", it's pretty obvious people aren't.
TheForgivenOne wrote:And you can easily just up the amount of players to 6, VIOLA! You won't get New Recruits.
tkr4lf wrote:This whole situation is basically false advertisement. People pay $25 to be able to play whatever games they wish to with whatever settings they wish to. That is the fundamental draw of this website. But, after joining up and paying that money, then they find out that they can't play a certain map with certain settings because NR's are drawn to that particular mix of map/settings. This is something that needs to be addressed.
tkr4lf wrote:The majority of users are in favor of some sort of rank segregation when it comes to NR's. Now the question is whether lack is going to do what his customers (which are always right, if I heard correctly) want, or what he thinks is best, even though a majority of customers disagree.
tkr4lf wrote:It's not right to punish people for playing the game they want to just because a majority of the people who come to this site for the first time are expecting a quick game of risk and find out that that is not what this site is at all, and thus never come back. That is not our fault.
Strife wrote:I hereby state Martin Ronne has inappropriately touched me. I would like to file charges against this sick bastard and expect he be sent to prison.
Dibbun wrote:This is such a stupid debate.
Just don't fucking farm
Not that damn hard. If all your games are being filled by ?'s then pick some different settings. No idea how people have 30+ games with all NR's and then are like "durrrrrr accident!"
Return to Archived Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users