Moderator: Community Team
drunkmonkey wrote:I honestly wonder why anyone becomes a mod on this site. You're the whiniest bunch of players imaginable.
Ron Burgundy wrote:Why don't you go back to your home on Whore Island?
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:We already have a random map feature. Why not have random spoils and reinforcements ? Throw in fog or no fog. Nukes, etc. Make the entire game play a complete surprise !
Donlarry wrote:i hate it
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:We already have a random map feature. Why not have random spoils and reinforcements ? Throw in fog or no fog. Nukes, etc. Make the entire game play a complete surprise !
Streaker wrote:Donlarry wrote:i hate it
What can you possibly 'hate' about a random choice?
PLAYER57832 wrote:It does sound like fun. However, it might be worthwhile to exclude a very few maps. Not many, but just some combinations that plain won't work.
PLAYER57832 wrote:For example, Fuedal and AOR already cannot have more than 6 players. That is an "internal" limit.
PLAYER57832 wrote:AOR1 without fog is not really a game, so that could be excluded... very, very few others.
mgconstruction wrote:This is a good idea.
I would like to see a map exclusion in random feature as well. An option to exclude certain maps from random. I run random maps in my tourneys as a neutral map but would love to be able to exclude the Hive map as so many people hate it. It would also be nice to exclude both players home maps in the random feature so that their home maps don't come up in the random game & give that player an advantage.
MG
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:We already have a random map feature. Why not have random spoils and reinforcements ? Throw in fog or no fog. Nukes, etc. Make the entire game play a complete surprise !
Donlarry wrote:i hate it
PLAYER57832 wrote:As long as you can choose between freestyle and sequential, I would love it. The other types are fun variation, but freestyle requires a significantly greater real time commitment to play well.
der sniffter wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:As long as you can choose between freestyle and sequential, I would love it. The other types are fun variation, but freestyle requires a significantly greater real time commitment to play well.
So you wish to make random less random??
I don't like adjacent forts at all but in this suggestion that is just the risk/fun of joining/creating this type of game.
sniff
PLAYER57832 wrote:der sniffter wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:As long as you can choose between freestyle and sequential, I would love it. The other types are fun variation, but freestyle requires a significantly greater real time commitment to play well.
So you wish to make random less random??
I don't like adjacent forts at all but in this suggestion that is just the risk/fun of joining/creating this type of game.
sniff
This is more like randomizing speed in. Playing freestyle requires a significant time commitment not there with Sequential. Its not just a matter of shifting strategy, its a matter of having the time to just sit.
Return to Archived Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users