Moderator: Cartographers
thenobodies80 wrote:Cairsnwk, what are the territories that give you problems with the space?
I did a quick test with 888 and the map resized to 700px x 700px and it seems to me that everything fits, maybe farndale is a bit tight but it could be fixed changing a bit the border with lynwood to fit the name of the region in the right way/have a clearer border with thornlie. What do you think about 700x700 for the small? It will be better for those who use the small maps because it's
Nobodies
cairnswk wrote:tnb80, 700x700 would be fine.
isaiah40 wrote:cairnswk wrote:tnb80, 700x700 would be fine.
That being said ...
koontz1973 wrote:Can I suggest Victiria park neutral to VP East so a lucky drop in small games allows more openness to Perth.
Also South Perth to Como so the bridge is not blocked by 6 neutrals.
Cottlesoe is hard to read on the map because of the black line running through the l.
cairnswk wrote:Version 4.
Trying to re-work the map, colour etc. No quite happy with everything yet, but will soldier on...
Quite a few more terrs and continents.
Gillipig wrote:...
colours look better now. Much better!
koontz1973 wrote:Like the added sea routes and the territs you placed them onto but would be a little worried about the line causing confusion. You have quite a bit of space there in the corner where you have explained it, is there a way to explain it without the line?
Rottnest and Perth do not have docks. Will you add?
Is the neutral 3 on Swan or Dianella?
chapcrap wrote:It seems to me like the borders need a lot of work. The graphics of the territories just aren't very appealling.
Also, it looks like Perth connects to Fremantle instead of connecting to Rottnest Island. I'm not the biggest fan of the dashed line sea routes. And the abstract city line as the background/side image on the right should go.
cairnswk wrote:Do you have a suggestion as to what the background should be?
Or do others agree that it should go.
chapcrap wrote:As far as the background goes, if people haven't been following along, I doubt they could even tell that it supposed to be a city landscape. I don't know how koontz thinks it fits just because there is water on the map.
And what about the sea routes?
chapcrap wrote:As far as the background goes, if people haven't been following along, I doubt they could even tell that it supposed to be a city landscape. I don't know how koontz thinks it fits just because there is water on the map.
And what about the sea routes?
koontz1973 wrote:...the map itself may change, that is up to cairnswk...
cairnswk wrote:chapcrap wrote:As far as the background goes, if people haven't been following along, I doubt they could even tell that it supposed to be a city landscape. I don't know how koontz thinks it fits just because there is water on the map.
And what about the sea routes?
What about the sea routes? I'm sorry but i am really not a mind reader chapcrap. What are you trying to say here.
chapcrap wrote:It seems to me like the borders need a lot of work. The graphics of the territories just aren't very appealling.
Also, it looks like Perth connects to Fremantle instead of connecting to Rottnest Island. I'm not the biggest fan of the dashed line sea routes. And the abstract city line as the background/side image on the right should go.
chapcrap wrote:cairnswk wrote:chapcrap wrote:As far as the background goes, if people haven't been following along, I doubt they could even tell that it supposed to be a city landscape. I don't know how koontz thinks it fits just because there is water on the map.
And what about the sea routes?
What about the sea routes? I'm sorry but i am really not a mind reader chapcrap. What are you trying to say here.chapcrap wrote:It seems to me like the borders need a lot of work. The graphics of the territories just aren't very appealling.
Also, it looks like Perth connects to Fremantle instead of connecting to Rottnest Island. I'm not the biggest fan of the dashed line sea routes. And the abstract city line as the background/side image on the right should go.
Fortunately, you don't have to read minds. It was part of my first post.
As far as the background, you can barely even tell that it's a landscape. That's the problem I have. I don't have a problem with a landscape in general, just the one that is used. It just looks like a messy blob of colors.
chapcrap wrote:Well, I would use a thinner line for the sea routes and make it a line instead of dashes.
If Perth and Rottnest connect by ferry, why do they need to connect by airport as well? I was looking for a little clarification there.
chapcrap wrote:Docks would be a much better solution, especially if they all border.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users