Moderator: Community Team
tkr4lf wrote:Pretty sure this has been suggested and rejected many times before. It's a great idea, and I would be all for it.
But I think CC admin is adamantly against anything like this ever happening on CC, so good luck with it.
ThrushAAX wrote:Isn't this what the callouts forum is for? Create a bunch of password protected games with the common ranks password and post in the ranks thread.
Personally I would like an option like this too. But the forum has worked well enough for me.
Shadow Assassin wrote:has this already been suggested or something? im not really getting any responses....
Woodruff wrote:Shadow Assassin wrote:has this already been suggested or something? im not really getting any responses....
Many times. Unfortunately, there are always some weak-ass excuses that don't hold water about why this would be bad for the site, and then the suggestion is closed.
darth emperor wrote:Woodruff wrote:Shadow Assassin wrote:has this already been suggested or something? im not really getting any responses....
Many times. Unfortunately, there are always some weak-ass excuses that don't hold water about why this would be bad for the site, and then the suggestion is closed.
No, what he is proposing is another thing, because it only searches... in point of fact, there was an addon that had that option. That add-on also had the option to filter games based, on how many more players needed a game to start
Woodruff wrote:darth emperor wrote:Woodruff wrote:Shadow Assassin wrote:has this already been suggested or something? im not really getting any responses....
Many times. Unfortunately, there are always some weak-ass excuses that don't hold water about why this would be bad for the site, and then the suggestion is closed.
No, what he is proposing is another thing, because it only searches... in point of fact, there was an addon that had that option. That add-on also had the option to filter games based, on how many more players needed a game to start
Ah, I see what you're saying. I didn't read it closely enough. Good call.
Although I have to wonder that if this were to be implemented, wouldn't they essentially be admitting that the suggestions for such limits when creating games should also be acceptable? I mean, it would seem that the one would naturally and unavoidably point to the other.
Woodruff wrote:Don't misunderstand. I like the idea, and I support it heartily. But I fear for the reasons why I don't believe it will be accepted.
And I like that you're explaining the differences, as maybe that will keep it from happening (the rejection, that is).
TheForgivenOne wrote:Woodruff wrote:Don't misunderstand. I like the idea, and I support it heartily. But I fear for the reasons why I don't believe it will be accepted.
And I like that you're explaining the differences, as maybe that will keep it from happening (the rejection, that is).
Hmmmm, I'm going to leave this out here. I feel it won't be as harsh as a rank segregation if you started a game with limits on rank.
Plus I think it would be hard to find a very wide range of games with no players with "score below x or above y". (I can already feel someone is going to say that made no sense BUT IT MADE SENSE IN MY HEAD!)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users