Moderator: Community Team
aad0906 wrote:I don't know but they had some pretty damn good presidents in the past. Teddy Roosevelt was a strong supporter of segregation of state and religion, Eisenhower who greatly expanded social security and built the Interstate network and last but not least Lincoln.
Frigidus wrote:A miserable pile of tax cuts.
bedub1 wrote:aad0906 wrote:I don't know but they had some pretty damn good presidents in the past. Teddy Roosevelt was a strong supporter of segregation of state and religion, Eisenhower who greatly expanded social security and built the Interstate network and last but not least Lincoln.
Sounds like it USED to be a great party. But what is it now?
Army of GOD wrote:again with the fucking love of partisanship.
when will any of you morons realize political party means as much as the turd I just dropped ever so gracefully from my balloon knot?
Army of GOD wrote:again with the fucking love of partisanship.
when will any of you morons realize political party means as much as the turd I just dropped ever so gracefully from my balloon knot?
Juan_Bottom wrote:Army of GOD wrote:again with the fucking love of partisanship.
when will any of you morons realize political party means as much as the turd I just dropped ever so gracefully from my balloon knot?
You missed the point. When you look back at American History, every great idea or change came from Liberals. Conservatism means never change.
Phatscotty wrote:The answer to this very serious question can be represented best in this short 8 minute video clip
::lights dim::
Juan_Bottom wrote:Army of GOD wrote:again with the fucking love of partisanship.
when will any of you morons realize political party means as much as the turd I just dropped ever so gracefully from my balloon knot?
You missed the point. When you look back at American History, every great idea or change came from Liberals. Conservatism means never change. You're always going to identify with one group better than the other.
If the Rules Committee Report were to pass without adoption of the Minority Reports, it would amount to a power grab by Washington, D.C. party insiders and consultants designed to silence the voice of state party activists and Republican grassroots by:
*** Handing national party officials the power to change national party rules adopted by state and grassroots leaders at the Republican National Convention. For generations, the prohibition of manipulated changes in the national Rules of the Republican Party between national conventions has served as one of the crown jewels of our party. It’s a power grab which opens the door to many future power grabs.
*** Stripping state parties in all states with binding primaries of the power of choosing who will represent their states as national delegates and alternate delegates.
This outrageous change would empower presidential campaigns to disapprove and remove delegates and alternate delegates selected by rules adopted by state Republican parties. Rather than grassroots activists who won delegate and alternate delegate slots by following state party rules, a large majority of positions would be handed to top donors of the winning campaign.
*** Gutting the great and successful reform adopted in the current election cycle to stop the dangerous trend to front-load the selection of national convention delegates. Our party would move again toward a national primary which would deny grassroots Republicans the opportunity to vet presidential candidates in a nomination contest of reasonable length. This reform must not be abandoned.
Juan_Bottom wrote:Does anyone else think it's funny that the RNC is being held in a Hurricane-prone area during Hurricane season?
YOU CANT TRUST PEOPLE LIKE THIS TO PLAN FOR AMERICA.
Frigidus wrote:A miserable pile of tax cuts.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Juan_Bottom wrote:Does anyone else think it's funny that the RNC is being held in a Hurricane-prone area during Hurricane season?
YOU CANT TRUST PEOPLE LIKE THIS TO PLAN FOR AMERICA.
Juan_Bottom wrote:Does anyone else think it's funny that the RNC is being held in a Hurricane-prone area during Hurricane season?
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: ConfederateSS, Dukasaur, jusplay4fun