Moderator: Community Team
Cherry pepsi? wrote:I don't know about you guys, but i check my dice stats frequently.. and i was wondering if anyone has hit lower than -63% in assult. I guess -100% means i won't win anything. I'm getting pretty close guys haha.
donkeymile wrote:I just went 29v17 and it ended 3 - 16
fucking bullshit you'd never see in real life .... oh well
donkeymile wrote:I just went 29v17 and it ended 3 - 16
fucking bullshit you'd never see in real life .... oh well
chang50 wrote:donkeymile wrote:I just went 29v17 and it ended 3 - 16
fucking bullshit you'd never see in real life .... oh well
I'm curious,why did you keep attacking when you dipped below parity,ie 16 v 16 or whenever?Unless it was totally vital to take the territory surely that is poor play.Btw I've seen worse happen in real life risk..
chang50 wrote:donkeymile wrote:I just went 29v17 and it ended 3 - 16
fucking bullshit you'd never see in real life .... oh well
I'm curious,why did you keep attacking when you dipped below parity,ie 16 v 16 or whenever?Unless it was totally vital to take the territory surely that is poor play.Btw I've seen worse happen in real life risk..
donkeymile wrote:what I meant by real life was a RISK game ... not literal real life - dice are much different than real warriors.
History is replete with examples of minority forces destroying much larger armies ... its usually strategy that came out on top in those cases ... I just rolled some dice ...
Symmetry wrote:donkeymile wrote:what I meant by real life was a RISK game ... not literal real life - dice are much different than real warriors.
History is replete with examples of minority forces destroying much larger armies ... its usually strategy that came out on top in those cases ... I just rolled some dice ...
As is this site- it happens. It ain't a given that having larger numbers means you'll win. It simply means that you have a higher probability of winning.
Your example could also occur in real life. You were simply unlucky, plus your tactics were poor. Either you used auto-attack, or you manually kept attacking even when the odds were against you.
Neither are good ideas,
AslanTheKing wrote:Symmetry wrote:donkeymile wrote:what I meant by real life was a RISK game ... not literal real life - dice are much different than real warriors.
History is replete with examples of minority forces destroying much larger armies ... its usually strategy that came out on top in those cases ... I just rolled some dice ...
As is this site- it happens. It ain't a given that having larger numbers means you'll win. It simply means that you have a higher probability of winning.
Your example could also occur in real life. You were simply unlucky, plus your tactics were poor. Either you used auto-attack, or you manually kept attacking even when the odds were against you.
Neither are good ideas,
u guys are so afraid of the auto attack button, it used to be crap, it has been fixed,
if i lose against my opponent 1 troop, then i press autoattack if there is only one troop, it works
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users