Moderator: Community Team
DoomYoshi wrote:aage wrote:I was blocked. Who did this?
So you and droz were both blocked last night and there was no kill?
Why am I not surprised
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
NoSurvivors wrote:Shouldn't we hear from sound, not chap? Or..
NoSurvivors wrote:Shoot I meant to say sound THEN chap. -face palm-
I'm not sure I understand what you are saying, are you saying you could not have sent in an kill, but did send in your action ahead of time. Or that you didn't send in an action, but somehow know that you were blocked?aage wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:aage wrote:I was blocked. Who did this?
So you and droz were both blocked last night and there was no kill?
Why am I not surprised
Haha, funny. Even if I were so stupid to claim this as scum, I wasn't here during the entire 'night' so I doubt I could have sent in a kill. No, I personally suspect a doc save, the only two dead doc-related roles were scum with the "doc switch" implying there is/are more.
/ wrote:I'm not sure I understand what you are saying, are you saying you could not have sent in an kill, but did send in your action ahead of time. Or that you didn't send in an action, but somehow know that you were blocked?aage wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:aage wrote:I was blocked. Who did this?
So you and droz were both blocked last night and there was no kill?
Why am I not surprised
Haha, funny. Even if I were so stupid to claim this as scum, I wasn't here during the entire 'night' so I doubt I could have sent in a kill. No, I personally suspect a doc save, the only two dead doc-related roles were scum with the "doc switch" implying there is/are more.
Did you lose your vote?
VioIet wrote:/ wrote:I'm not sure I understand what you are saying, are you saying you could not have sent in an kill, but did send in your action ahead of time. Or that you didn't send in an action, but somehow know that you were blocked?aage wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:aage wrote:I was blocked. Who did this?
So you and droz were both blocked last night and there was no kill?
Why am I not surprised
Haha, funny. Even if I were so stupid to claim this as scum, I wasn't here during the entire 'night' so I doubt I could have sent in a kill. No, I personally suspect a doc save, the only two dead doc-related roles were scum with the "doc switch" implying there is/are more.
Did you lose your vote?
QFT. I think aage contradicted himself here. You wouldn't know that you were blocked, unless you sent in an action. So the point about not being able to send in a kill is moot.
soundman wrote:NoSurvivors wrote:Shouldn't we hear from sound, not chap? Or..NoSurvivors wrote:Shoot I meant to say sound THEN chap. -face palm-
Hear what from me? Chap is the one that would have info for us.
I went back to Day 5 to find Doom's case against Droz. Could you repost your case, Doom? I'm a little confused on the details.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
edocsil wrote:One-Shot Sensor
So there's more. Since we have not much else to go on and you're claiming more powers here, I would appreciate it if you were to share what you found, if anything.Squirrel said he could find out whether someone is an angel as a collateral effect of his role.
In response to D, we don't know if Chap was blocked or if he was playing a ruse, so that point is moot. Other points are valid, although I never consider town watcher an overly OP role.DoomYoshi wrote:@soundman: there are a couple of probabilty problems pointing to him being scum:
a) it is unlikely to have 5 investigative roles in a game (confirmed sensor, confirmed tracker, Rodion's investigation, saf semi-confirmed cop, and then the watcher)
b) due to chap's reveal, there is about a 50% chance he is scum
c)a town watcher is an OP role, and is very rare IMO.
d) it was unlikely that both droz and chap would be blocked on the same night
Second are the actually scummy things droz did:
claiming for no reason
refusing to report who he watched; even though it was obvious that he either watched chap or is anti-town
Care to explain why I must be on Droz's team, or should I just take your word for it? I get that you think me likely scum because of Chap's ability.DoomYoshi wrote:Oops, forgot the associative case. Aage and droz seem to be on the same team and aage is also a likely scum.
aage wrote:So there's more. Since we have not much else to go on and you're claiming more powers here, I would appreciate it if you were to share what you found, if anything.
Fastposted by Strike and Rodion
DoomYoshi wrote:@soundman: there are a couple of probabilty problems pointing to him being scum:
a) it is unlikely to have 5 investigative town roles in a game (confirmed sensor, confirmed tracker, Rodion's investigation, saf semi-confirmed cop, and then the watcher)
DoomYoshi wrote:@soundman: there are a couple of probabilty problems pointing to him being scum:
a) it is unlikely to have 5 investigative roles in a game (confirmed sensor, confirmed tracker, Rodion's investigation, saf semi-confirmed cop, and then the watcher)
b) due to chap's reveal, there is about a 50% chance he is scum
c)a town watcher is an OP role, and is very rare IMO.
d) it was unlikely that both droz and chap would be blocked on the same night
Second are the actually scummy things droz did:
claiming for no reason
refusing to report who he watched; even though it was obvious that he either watched chap or is anti-town
DRoZ wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:@soundman: there are a couple of probabilty problems pointing to him being scum:
a) it is unlikely to have 5 investigative roles in a game (confirmed sensor, confirmed tracker, Rodion's investigation, saf semi-confirmed cop, and then the watcher)
b) due to chap's reveal, there is about a 50% chance he is scum
c)a town watcher is an OP role, and is very rare IMO.
d) it was unlikely that both droz and chap would be blocked on the same night
Second are the actually scummy things droz did:
claiming for no reason
refusing to report who he watched; even though it was obvious that he either watched chap or is anti-town
-My status as a watcher has been corroborated. Arguing my alignment is valid, but arguing against my abilities makes for a much weaker position.
-Where does the "about 50%" number come from...
-I believe it is obvious now that chap was not blocked, he was just trying to keep up the charade.
-I gave my reasoning for claiming, there were a number of votes on me already and very little in the way of other prospective targets. Waiting for a closer number to lynch would only waste time and leave us with precious little left to find a suitable target.
-There are tons of reasons not to report on someone I watched, if someone is visited and nothing negative happens, it could be detrimental to say who was there. There is no reason to let the mafia know who I had already watched unless that information is vital to helping the town.
DRoZ wrote:
-There are tons of reasons not to report on someone I watched, if someone is visited and nothing negative happens, it could be detrimental to say who was there. There is no reason to let the mafia know who I had already watched unless that information is vital to helping the town.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users